Hi Clambake. Keep it up!

this is a test

www.exscientologist.com is about a small group of Ex Scientologists that still practice the religion as it was before modification by RTC. You can still go up the old bridge! The old bridge is better!

The new bridge is available as well! Both bridges are very affordable, there are no Sec Check, and no 'Regging' (high power or otherwise). You go up the bridge in a totally self determined fashion!

www.exscientologist.com has a list of the names and addresses of thousands of Ex Scientologists! If you are on the list and wish to be removed please visit the site and contact the appropriate person. Alternately, if you wish your name to be included on the list, let us know!

That list of supposedly ex-scientologists does not seem very reliable. I have not read it through very carefully, but noticed there is at least one person who in present time is doing PR work for OSA in Sweden.

Catarina:

It's a big list. I will help Rey get it right.

The postulate and intention behind the list, was to stimulate the formation of groups that want to practice the Scientology religion as taught by LRH (not RTC).

I never did like the church -- even in 1973. I just liked the courses and the auditing.

If anybody can help us correct the list, we would appreciate the effort!

Uhm - sorry - sysadmin needing to test migration. Just ignore.

Congratulations, you're back up!

I hate RTC, but love LRH. I request a topic on this board for people who like the religion (auditing and training), but hate the church.

I am getting the bridge outside of the church and I'm getting better results for a twentieth the $$$

$400,000 may be OK for John Travolta, but it's far too steep for me!

test

To Fred. You should really take a look at some of the scientific criticism of Dianetics. I am not talking about criticism about LRH personally, but about the fact that the entire scientific community agrees that Dianetics can be very harmfull.

Just as an example, LRH claimed that exposure to OT3 before being properly prepared can be fatal. If this is true, then clearly the practice of Scientology is at least potentially dangerous.

You owe it to yourself to check out the potential dangers from all sources, not just LRH. If, having been made aware of the possible dangers, you still decide that Scientology is right for you, then that's clearly your decision to make. But you should be aware of ALL of the facts before you make that decision, not just what LRH says.

As for your idea about a topic for people who like the religion, but not the church, I think that's a great idea. But don't be surprised if you recieve a lot of criticism there. A lot of people very strongly believe that the fundemental basis of Dianetics and Scientology is fraudulent and dangerous. I personally have no direct experience with Scientology, but as a physicist who knows for a fact that at least some of what LRH declared to be scientific fact is false, I am inclined to agree with them.

Dr. Stupid

GOOD TRIUMPS OVER EVIL!

Once again Andreas and the good guys have beaten back the evil horde and FREE SPEECH lives to fight another day! Hip Hip Hooray!!!

Gee, thanks Andreas for everything.

Tigger

(kisses ground and cries, "Oh, there's no place like home, there's no place like home!)

P.S. When you have time, please tell us all the exciting details how you did it.

Fred,
What exactly is the religion that you belive in.

Is the audit and training an integrated part or is it possible to be religious without that part?

Is it possible to train and audit without being religious?

Simplex

Glad to see you back up !!

Kudos to Andreas,
Your hard work is greatly appreciated by all of us I'm sure. Free Speech will not be Denied!

NG

TEST

I'm having a lot of trouble getting into anything on this M.B.

Test - ignore