Smurf is right, although baldfaced. Miranda was not telling the whole truth. She said on page 19
Quote:
The boy is in the Cadet org. Behind-the-scenes plans had been made to try to get him back to his parents, and then Smurf posted his photo, alerting OSA
On page 22, Smurf copied her text exactly and replied
Quote:
That is a boldfaced lie, Miranda, and being a mod then, you would have known who posted the screenprint of the Facebook page on Kenya Smythe's post about her 12-year old son joining the Sea Org, along with her child's photo, standing next to a young woman named Brenda.
The earlier pre-Smurf post of the offending photo has supposedly been deleted, and (as I said earlier) THAT was the post that likely alerted OSA. In my opinion, if wwp really wanted to have minimum attention about this boy, they would have deleted that first one immediately and when Smurf asked where it went, work with Smurf to prevent him re-posting it. Instead, I can see how Smurf interpreted the flow of events that the mods jumped at a pretext to punish and ban Smurf for past annoyances and broken promises, and being one of many doxers on wwp.
Whatever the motivation, in a public show that doxing policies were tightening up, wwp caused an enormous public mess by banning Smurf. WWP attracted, in the critic community, huge attention to the Jet case, which itself is a kind of doxing.
Summing up, when there are serious accusations flying about, it is a lie to state a narrative that leaves out the earlier poster and state that
Quote:
then Smurf posted his photo, alerting OSA.
This is not the Smurf channel. Take your crap next door.
Login
Register
OCMB FAQ
FAQ
Search
