Dream on, Fluff Muffin! Any one who wants to can read your posts, and mine. I don't follow you around, I merely tell the truth when you LIE like the scientologist you are...and admit to and brag about being a "scientologist" and how scientology "works".
Of course I admit to being a Scn'ist. You want me to LIE and say I'm not something that I am? I post on forums. I say who I am, where I live and what my interests are. So what.
Tell us another story about how scientology cured your heart problems, Fluffy.
Can't oblige you. I never said anything about having "heart problems" to begin with.
American Buddha and I were having a discussion as to whether Scn might have certain effects and if so, why. So I related an anecdote, and in that anecdote I never ever said I had a heart problem or condition.
If you want to complain about advertising or whatsit, well, you've put far more emphasis on that conversation than I ever had. The bulk of the references to it came from you, not me. So you've yourself to blame for that.
Claire has bragged how she and her husband John have an "unusual" sexual relationship.
You are a liar.
Well how special. Especially having seen your pictures, Fluffy Cochon.
Wow. How vicious and sick.
Keep it to yourself and no one will comment on it.
Keep WHAT to myself? Something I didn't write about John and myself?
A spoof of an a.r.s. post
which, too, was posted on ARS
Boy, that really makes no sense, at all. Except that you're obsessed.
Keep on sharing your sad sordid personal life and lies and I will keep on commenting on them.
1) You've posted nothing about my personal life. You've posted a spoof of an ARS post. And it's obviously a spoof since it's formatted like a Flag Order and "signed by" Hubbard. Nowhere does it say "Me and my husband like to".
2) It's an a.r.s
3) you haven't found or posted any lies. Because there aren't any, except from you.
Put a lid on it Claire. It's offensive.
You're the one who's offensive. You've posted something false about me and that even if it were true- which it certainly is not (I didn't say it and I don't HAVE an "unusual sexual lifestyle" in any respect) would have no bearing on a forum about criticizing Scientology.
Sorry all, but here is some of what Fluffer writes that she accuses me of objecting to[size=9].
God, how stupid can you be, Ladybird.
My post was a spoof of a post someone posted that was from an FO about how to use a vibrator. The whole thread is about the fact that there was such an FO.
So I wrote a spoof. You can tell it's a spoof. It's set up like a Flag order and is purportedly signed by L Ron Hubbard.
How stupid can this be.
Jesus Christ, imagine being fair gamed by a critic who thinks she should behave like an OSA op.