One opened, more to come!
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:12 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 262 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:16 pm
Posts: 303
I might add I was silenced quite a few days ago, before this could possibly have been called "flogging a dead horse" or "trolling".

Anyhow, I've thought of another few posting guidelines for those still confused. Think of this as a "Dummies Guide to Enturbulation.org".

5. WBM is still not ghey. This is because we haven't thought of a reason yet why he should be ghey but we're working on one. We think his beard might be ghey. Someone heard someone else say that they heard it was.

6. Boris and Son of Boris can keep their kewl leet status for the moment, but see above, we'll keep you informed. They do not have beards so it's hard to tell for sure.

7. We have decided that Jason Beghe may keep his nuts. For now. Unless we get bored with this current shitstorm THEN IT'S ON LIKE DONKEY KONG FAGGOT!

(btw, parody, sarcasm, titsorgtfo)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 331
Vled wrote:
i agree with what you say there BobDylon about lasting effects of indoctrination.

However, you seemed to imply (forgive me if i am mistaken here) that maybe i was one of those being affected by such?

For the record, i've never been involved in Scientology. i come at this as a researcher of New Religious Movements and in particular groups with coercive indoctrination techniques.

Pretty sure you weren't talking about me...but there was room for doubt so thought i'd clear it up ;)

*edit* i will be lmao for quite a while if this thread manages to beat the original drama one ;) it's getting there!


NO WAY - I did NOT mean YOU !!

You are a breath of fresh air- even though I can tell you feel you have to choose your words ever-so-carefully to be accepted around here.

FREE SPEECH is FREE meaning unCENSORED

That is part of the hypocrisy I and others have seen - ppl claiming SCN has a problem because they do not change with the times yet it is happening elsewhere too-

Since Anonymous has come along, in such strong force, it has PROVEN that innovation is KEY and, in fact, IS EFFECTIVE in exposing the harms of scientology and severe damage THE TECH does to the very core of a being.

take care


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:56 am
Posts: 331
BobDylan wrote:
Vled wrote:
i agree with what you say there BobDylon about lasting effects of indoctrination.

However, you seemed to imply (forgive me if i am mistaken here) that maybe i was one of those being affected by such?

For the record, i've never been involved in Scientology. i come at this as a researcher of New Religious Movements and in particular groups with coercive indoctrination techniques.

Pretty sure you weren't talking about me...but there was room for doubt so thought i'd clear it up ;)

*edit* i will be lmao for quite a while if this thread manages to beat the original drama one ;) it's getting there!


i meant to also say the NUMBER of views and interest in THIS thread and the one that is closed should be a good indicator that these topics are of great interest to many people... Like i said before people are taking note even if they have not joined in the conversation.

INTEGRITY is at stake for the movement at the moment regardless of any preordained hierarchy established and that is what should be paramount.

..I doubt any changes will come about though- you know when people make up their minds about something they do not want to change - just like the poor suckers who spend all their efforts and money in scientology- they think they are RIGHT... even when they are not.

---NO WAY - I did NOT mean YOU !!

You are a breath of fresh air- even though I can tell you feel you have to choose your words ever-so-carefully to be accepted around here.

FREE SPEECH is FREE meaning unCENSORED

That is part of the hypocrisy I and others have seen - ppl claiming SCN has a problem because they do not change with the times yet it is happening elsewhere too-

Since Anonymous has come along, in such strong force, it has PROVEN that innovation is KEY and, in fact, IS EFFECTIVE in exposing the harms of scientology and severe damage THE TECH does to the very core of a being.

take care


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:44 pm
Posts: 800
BobDylan wrote:
BobDylan wrote:
Vled wrote:
i agree with what you say there BobDylon about lasting effects of indoctrination.

However, you seemed to imply (forgive me if i am mistaken here) that maybe i was one of those being affected by such?

For the record, i've never been involved in Scientology. i come at this as a researcher of New Religious Movements and in particular groups with coercive indoctrination techniques.

Pretty sure you weren't talking about me...but there was room for doubt so thought i'd clear it up ;)

*edit* i will be lmao for quite a while if this thread manages to beat the original drama one ;) it's getting there!


i meant to also say the NUMBER of views and interest in THIS thread and the one that is closed should be a good indicator that these topics are of great interest to many people... Like i said before people are taking note even if they have not joined in the conversation.


Nothing new under the sun. The biggest flame wars have always attracted the most viewers here and everywhere else.

Having said that, I am doing now what I said I'd do when this board became fully moderated (and should have done then) and that is not letting me hit myself in the ass on the way out.

_________________
I can’t imagine I’m the only one thinking clearly about this. Sometimes I think I’m taking crazy pills.
- Phil Plait


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:00 am
Posts: 866
Location: Out-Ethics
Is it possible, folks, that OCMB and EO serve different purposes?

I've always seen this forum as a place for DISCUSSION. On OCMB, Scientologists are allowed to debate things or make arguments, people talk about their experiences, etc. Criticizing this forum for "not getting anything done" seems, at least to me, off the mark. It's a forum; this section is OPINION and DEBATE, no?

Conversely, EO would never put up with scientologists talking about their "wins" over there. It seems to me that EO isn't about talking; it's about doing. And good on 'em for it.

So I'm beginning to see EO and OCMB as groups with separate purposes, filling separate needs, while focused on scientology. Maybe each has its place, and doesn't need to be molded toward the other.

Personally (I'll say it for the last time, then it's STFU): TD is an embarrassment to their cause; keep it, but store it elsewhere, IMO. BUT! This thread here helps me understand it, a bit:

http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=28380

So I stay out of TD, and all is well with me...

Mewba wrote:
At the monthly S.F. protests, besides my wife and me, there are usually just 3 or 4 others that are over 40 years old. Out of 50-100 protesters. Not much OCMB or OG representation out there that I can see.


um, maybe cuz we're wearing masks? (over 40, at SF rally 3x) just sayin'... Anons outnumber OG, this is also a factor. If ALL OG's went out to picket, wouldn't they still be outnumbered?

Mewba wrote:
I think Anonymous is awesome. It's hard for me to believe that anyone here can think that we can win the war with the cult without them.


Agree, completely. But the reason I agree is: OG's (with respect to the general public) are a small number of people, not enough to make an army. Anons give the movement troops, and that's great. But personally, I think we need to sway the opinion of the general public, and in turn the lawmakers, to REALLY get anything to happen. But some have said "I don't care about what the public thinks, they're stupid..." well yes, but how else will real change be effected, I'm wondering.

Mewba wrote:
I think this whole debacle has made us (as OCMBers) look like a bunch of windbags.


A bit... but without those who talk, how would those who walk, know which way?

see you by the pyramid some time, eh?

- N

_________________
Cannot
Understand
Logical
Thinking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:12 pm
Posts: 672
entheta wrote:
But some have said "I don't care about what the public thinks, they're stupid..." well yes, but how else will real change be effected, I'm wondering.


Don't read too much into that. There's another thread on the exact topic of public image, where consensus seems to be that needlessly offending the public is counterproductive. http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-gener ... s-23700/2/

Groups often engage in some sort of handwringing about collective identity, and while it's good to be aware of it, 98% of the time it's nothing that people outside of that group need to worry about. It will keep going on, so if you're going to lose sleep over it, you're going to end up very tired.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:00 am
Posts: 866
Location: Out-Ethics
ZenuEtrawl wrote:
... There's another thread on the exact topic of public image, where consensus seems to be that needlessly offending the public is counterproductive. http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-gener ... s-23700/2/


Glad to see. I would agree with "Quote" in that thread. That's all...

-

_________________
Cannot
Understand
Logical
Thinking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:41 am
Posts: 1296
Location: Thunderdome
entheta wrote:
Anons give the movement troops, and that's great.


I think the problem lies within this attitude.

Certain OG Rockstars viewed Anons as their minions and thought they could order them around. Anons resented the effort to control them, seeing it as a threat, just as they saw Co$ attempts to suppress the wacky TC video as a threat.

OG Rockstars were surprised when the Anons didn't turn out to be adoring throngs of worshipers, willing to applaud and cheer for their pictures. Fail ensued.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:00 am
Posts: 866
Location: Out-Ethics
spacecootie wrote:
entheta wrote:
Anons give the movement troops, and that's great.


I think the problem lies within this attitude. Certain OG Rockstars viewed Anons as their minions and thought they could order them around.


If my wording gave that impression, I now seek to correct that.

What I meant was more like this: OG, for years, had only so many bodies it could put into the fight. Even if they all went out and picketed, there would only be a few people at each org. Anon brought many new bodies in. Legion. That's what I meant by troops. Not subservient to OG, they came in for their own reasons. But their sheer numbers added strength, is all I'm saying... I need a beer...

_________________
Cannot
Understand
Logical
Thinking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:58 pm
Posts: 41
After what I just posted, I'm sure the baby will ban me now too. It was nice knowing you, until I come back under another screen name, under another fake IP address. See you all on August 16th with my Roan picket sign. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:41 am
Posts: 1296
Location: Thunderdome
entheta wrote:
spacecootie wrote:
entheta wrote:
Anons give the movement troops, and that's great.


I think the problem lies within this attitude. Certain OG Rockstars viewed Anons as their minions and thought they could order them around.


If my wording gave that impression, I now seek to correct that.

What I meant was more like this: OG, for years, had only so many bodies it could put into the fight. Even if they all went out and picketed, there would only be a few people at each org. Anon brought many new bodies in. Legion. That's what I meant by troops. Not subservient to OG, they came in for their own reasons. But their sheer numbers added strength, is all I'm saying... I need a beer...

Correction duly noted. Unfortunately, not everybody shares your level of humility, and some OG do view Anons as subservient.

The OG feel that they are entitled to respect and deference because they left Co$ and exposed its inner workings.

OTOH, many Anons feel the OG are valuable for their knowledge of the practices and seekrit skriptures of happy fun cult... but still wonder how anybody could get spend decades of their lives and much money (or, in the case of Sea Ogres, live in poverty and suffer constant abuse) before they realized they were suckers and LRH was into it for the money and lulz.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:41 am
Posts: 1296
Location: Thunderdome
ScientologyIsFreedumb wrote:
After what I just posted, I'm sure the baby will ban me now too. It was nice knowing you, until I come back under another screen name, under another fake IP address. See you all on August 16th with my Roan picket sign. :lol:


Before you get banned, please send me a PM that I can post to TD and get banned, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 290
Oh, for fuck's sake.

Can't some people stop the baby games and just leave if they don't want to be a part of this place anymore? Don't like the moderation? Fine. Lodge a complaint. But to carry on like this is just infantile.

All this arguing and posturing and symbolically thumbing your noses is just fucking retarded.


If you've got that much tension to release, just go rub one off or something.



Christ on a fucking bent pogo stick.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:27 pm
Posts: 70
Long thread is long and I'm not sure if this has been mentioned yet, so posting it here.

Daywatch just donated $500 to Enturb.
http://forums.enturbulation.org/7-gener ... ors-23393/

He's not just a troll. He's a dedicated anon... just a really fucking loud one. If anything, he says things that most other people don't like to bring up.

Inb4 "rock star". :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:23 pm
Posts: 2261
Location: Denmark
Well, Daywatch was one poster I've noticed calling for a rift between OG and Anon. Working hard on this shitstorm.. Or PR campaign... That could just be his opinion of course..

So.. $500 to restore his reputation?

Doesn't work for me I'm afraid.

.

_________________
Ask not what Scientology can do for you, ask what the F*arck! is going on.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 262 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group