Maybe Pitbull is OSA.. who knows? - When he sometimes post against $cientology it helps our cause.. When he posts in support of $cientology he also helps our cause.
Hah! - I'm in sticthes of mirth about that 'stat scale' you post Friendly Nature. - So he would get a point for posting... Then 'minus points' for 56 irate slammings of himself and Cof$ following? Some stat he can draw up! - But of course, if he count's stats the way I did when in... Mewhahaha!
Derailment of issue is our responsibility. Pitbull may be doing that, but it's still our own responsibilty to not get derailed. Even if a topic 'is' derailed, there's still the 56 irate slammings.
Nobody here is fooled by some Cof$ propaganda. Such inspires a regular avalanche of healthy debunking and ridicule.
If somebody lurking thinks the critics are 'insanely agressive' they'll assume that we got that way because of Cof$. I've seen that argued somewhere. - So what? - If they think that both the adherents and apostates are nuts they'll still keep a safe distance to Cof$.
If Pitbull 'is' OSA these mechanics would surely be disheartening for him/them. Sometimes I wonder if he's having a good laugh from all this.
To round this off profoundly, I'll quote Groucho Marx: "Outside of a dog, a book is a mans best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read..."
Hey! - It has more 'profoundness' than that line about pitbulls calling a Scientologist! - So there!