So you decide who is a good critic and who is a bad critic? Amazing! Simply amazing. Why don't we just let the fox in the hen house and let it decide which hens are to lay eggs and which are it's next meal.chad wrote:This is the whole point Ladybird. There are critics and then there are 'critics'.
You do seem to be of the stereotypically OCMB clique (I couldn't dare say cult could I ?) that works on the principle that as long as the 'criticism' is against the CoS then it's good. No matter what inaccuracies, bending of the truth or downright total fabrications are used, it's still all good.
Critics that I 'attack' are those who follow that doctrine, and effectively 100% of the world think the same way as I do, and that's the reality you need to grasp.
The CoS in all its manifestations is bad stuff. Not bad stuff in the scheme of things, which is why most people don't give a damn, but when you get idiots here on OCMB trying to beat it up into something it isn't, and when you get out and out liars like Horner getting such a salivatingly sad response, well, people just have to wonder about it all, don't they ?
If you don't want 'critics' on OCMB being attacked, then I'd urge you to urge them to be honest and to back off the sensational bullshit.
Is what I'm saying in any way supportive of the CoS or any of its operatives ? I can't see how. Hell, I'm doing you a favor by getting you in touch with wog reality
Chad as a critic you suck. You say you have been doing this a decade? Well gee I am not impressed. I have been only doing it (being a critic) for 8 years.
You call OCMBers a cult, idiots, morons, etc and expect respect for what you have to spout from that orafice on your face? Please I have heard more intelligence utterance from the back end of a donkey.