One opened, more to come!
It is currently Sat May 25, 2013 7:19 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 11017
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Thanks, Ladybird!

Ok,we can add to it, or just make a brief note on the post, if it's easy.

I mainly wanted others to keep in mind the viewing audience has WAY changed, thanks to

little Tommy Cruise doing such a terrific job of ~~showing~~what a Scientology "OT" is really all about,
South Park, and the many media exposing this insidious con.


Adding to it is a good idea, or I guess I was thinking of an easier one, with more commonly used words---ones that we all use quite often, but that gets tricky too. We *could* have the Most used words,
the expansion of words as there is now, and then the FAQ, which there is now. So the most often used words was what I was thinking of.

Do you still think we need to, or not? My thought is that many people won't go to that dictionary....they just won't...and then they don't really understand what we're referring to, or we have to constantly define it.

We could ask Andreas if he could put up a site, perhaps>>>>>>Here
to the right, like the emoticons on the left: The top 30 most frequently used Scio terms used that people could click on, and see the definition right here. That might work, eh?

Let me know what you think, and

HAPPY EASTER GIRL :wink: :wink:

Tory/Magoo~~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 4:51 am
Posts: 4430
Magoo, are you saying you faked the results of your processes?

No wonder you didn't get the results. So how can you complain now?

_________________
There's an old saying: when the going gets tough - pit bulls call a Scientologist."
-David Miscavige- 8 October, 1993
http://www.earthstation1.com/ThemeSongs/Branded.wav


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 5:51 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Scandalnavia
pitbull wrote:
No wonder you didn't get the results. So how can you complain now?


Wrong again, DickSkull, she didn't get her results because the tech is nothing but bullcrap. This axiom (tech=shit) so fundamental I really shouldn't have to point it out to you. Go shit in someone else's backyard. Preferably DM's.


www.geocities.com/xemuboy/

_________________
http://www.geocities.com/xemuboy/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 12:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:04 pm
Posts: 1484
pitbull wrote:
Magoo, are you saying you faked the results of your processes?

No wonder you didn't get the results. So how can you complain now?


Are you OTVII yet shitbull? If so, please call a press conference and show off your powers. I'll join the cult/con game right after you do it. Oh yeah, you're probably just a fat chain-smoking waste of skin who spent his whole adult life in a cult/con game that told him he'd be able to read people's minds, levitate objects, etc... if only he forked over some more cash. Sour grapes anyone?

_________________
"People with too many arguments should always be approached with suspicion. Dialectic and endless reasoning are usually used as resistance against disagreeable truths" A. M. Meerloo, M.D. "Delusion and Mass-Delusion" (c) 1949


Last edited by RIPODB on Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 1:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:05 pm
Posts: 3097
Gee pitbull, you mean scientology can be fooled? The tech couldn't discern a faker from reality, that can only can happen if the tech is the real sham.

What about those with high OT levels that are supposed to be able to see through people to their true intensions, were they wearing their lead sunglasses when Magoo was there?

Usually those who fake a sham is working, do so because they are unable to delude themselves into seeing it but still want to belong or are afraid of the repercussions of not being able to comply.

Ok so you are real good at deluding yourself, I have a few hypnotist I'd like you to meet.

I think that would be funny to see a pitbull that runs around thinking its a rooster


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 5:07 pm
Posts: 1122
Location: Bucks, UK
Sometimes I think OCMB readers are incapable of reading even the main Clambake site let alone using Search Engines.

Martin Hunt's Terminology FAQ

http://www.xenu.net/archive/dictionary/

is a Usenet FAQ and is posted monthly to ARS. Really.

There are others:

http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/dict.html

http://www.scientology.org/gloss.htm

http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/jargon.htm

and anyone troubling to type 'wog' into Google would have found

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wog

http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/wog_faq.htm

_________________
ARSCC Demographics Department
Still looking for 9,950,000 scientologists.
http://news-from-bree.blogspot.com/
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:55 am
Posts: 8877
Location: Somewhere far beyond the land of Oz.
pitbull wrote:
Magoo, are you saying you faked the results of your processes?

No wonder you didn't get the results. So how can you complain now?


It is amazing and weird how you mock Tory. Do you do this to just get attention? Do you feel about yourself that a bad effect is better than no effect at all?

Why are you such a f****g numb nuts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 11017
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Thank each of you for your observations of our local knucklehead: PB!

Quote:
Magoo, are you saying you faked the results of your processes?


Where is that quote? There isn't one, as I never said that, moron!

Damn, you sure work hard to drive the topics to Hell, don't you? :evil: Do you think you're "Winning". Well, here's a tip:

Scientology is dwindling, as people leap out! :leapfrog:
Scios are calling me, telling me they're L E A V I N G.
The "Wog World" (What Scientology calls EVERYONE outside of Scientology) is laughing at you all, daily. :lol: :lol: The CON Is UP! :!:
You are the best example of what people become, while "in" C oF S. :bowdown:

For those lurking, please keep reading the Web sites...all the information is there. :reading:

Best to each of you! :wink:

Tory/Magoo~~ 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:18 am
Posts: 191
Sponge wrote:
The term "WOG" in days gone by was an extremely demeaning racist term used in Britain (and its colonies) basically to classify all black/asian types. It only really fell out of use in the late 70's. Basically, it was the old British alternative/addition to the word "nigger".


Incidentally, in Australia for some reason the term is used for Greeks and Italians, not Asians (and not West Indians or Indians, etc.).

Up until the 80s the term was very offensive, but Greeks and Italians ended up adopting it for themselves and it's now lost its offensive connotations almost entirely.

I don't understand how Elron got away with it, though. During my childhood (spent in both the UK and Australia) anyone from an Anglo culture with an ounce/gram, respectively, of respectability would have shied away from an organisation that used that term.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 5630
hartley wrote:
Sometimes I think OCMB readers are incapable of reading even the main Clambake site let alone using Search Engines.

Martin Hunt's Terminology FAQ

http://www.xenu.net/archive/dictionary/

is a Usenet FAQ and is posted monthly to ARS. Really.

There are others:

http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/dict.html

http://www.scientology.org/gloss.htm

http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/jargon.htm

and anyone troubling to type 'wog' into Google would have found

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wog

http://www.daisy.freeserve.co.uk/wog_faq.htm


Hartley, thank you for the advice, but I want a refund on the attitude.

I was practicing "BYT" (biting my tongue) until you just kept on on other threads ... you can say the right thing in the wrong way...You need an attitude adjustment. Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2003 4:51 am
Posts: 4430
Quote:
Finally, on their top level, I got sick of their endless bs.gif So I made up "Skillions of years"...meaning whatever you damned well wanted it to be so it would read on the meter and we could finish the stupid drill!


OK, you got me there. It looks like you were faking your "drills".

Not quite the same as faking proceses, but without certain on the meter, then how can there be certainty in session?

_________________
There's an old saying: when the going gets tough - pit bulls call a Scientologist."
-David Miscavige- 8 October, 1993
http://www.earthstation1.com/ThemeSongs/Branded.wav


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 6:05 pm
Posts: 3097
pitbull wrote:
Not quite the same as faking proceses, but without certain on the meter, then how can there be certainty in session?


And without certainty of the mental state of L Ron which has always been in question, how can there be certainty of his sci-fi religion and it's unproven tech?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 3:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 11017
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
PB: Will you get a grip, and pullllllllease find some sort of sense of humor,
for God's sakes!

SKILLIONS was a joke we made up....out of frustration...and kidding.
It was a joke we told the staff, it wasn't a "Withhold" as you imply.

Of course I didn't "Fake" any levels. We were under a
microscope that you, and most, cannot even imagine. You wouldn't
say that if you honestly had a glimpse of what we went through. We HAD
to be "100% Standard", no question, and it wasn't something I would or could 'fake'.

Just reading you saying that lets me know you are just doing OSA op
C R A P...Period. How p a t h e t i c. :bowdown:

WAKE THE F*** UP! :roll:

Tory/Magoo~~~ 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 3:51 am
Posts: 685
Back to the terms, a term I found more insulting than wog, or even PTS, was "DB". DB means "degraded being", and was hurled around as an insult towards those who tried, and failed, at Scn. If you were a staffer or SO member and either blew or routed out or failed on post or something else (which is highly likely because it's practically feckin' impossible to make this mess work), you were called a "DB".

Read the specific Tech Dictionary definition this morning, and am even more disgusted with this term:

Quote:
DB, degraded being. Degraged beings find any instruction painful as they have been painfully indoctrinated with violent measures in the past. They therefore alter-is any order or don't comply... Degraded beings, taking a cue from SP associates, instinctively resent, hate and seek to obstruct any person in charge of anything or any Big Being.


So let's put this into real-world terms, shall we?

A DB is someone who is not easily controlled by Scn and the S.O. They recognize the horsesh*t for what it is and try to either stop it or fix it. So LRH responded by inventing a disgusting term for someone who, by all other measures, should be called a "Freedom Fighter" or, put more simply, "correct".

This was part of LRH's big game: making anyone opposed to him or his religion a Bad Person automatically.

That is the source of all that's wrong with Scn, this notion that Scn can do no wrong, that LRH can do no wrong, and that Scn is the single most important thing in the world.

Here's news: all throughout history, good works had problems that needed correcting. There was never a case of something wonderful being created that did not need fixing.

It's all arrogance ... and entrapment.

End of rant. Have a nice day. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group