One more thing Patty:
Before you reply with "Zinj did this, Gerry Did that, Tom did this, Bob did that, Stacy did this, etc..." let me ask you a question. Have "they" ever heard of taking the high road? If "they" are the best and brightest critics out there, why would "they" do such childish BS? Wouldn't "their" website be all about undressing $cientology and not about Bush bashing and perpetuating old feuds with people who are on the same side?
Let me understand this. You think talking the "high road" is more important than the facts. You are not interested in the actual truth?
You'd rather allow critics to just blurt out anything as long as it was critical of Scn and facts be damn?
And btw, it's OK for people to have outside interests and political views.
The critic movement is not supposed to be a narrow minded focused cult. Critics are allowed to have websites where they can give their own views of things others than Scn.
Your post basically proves my point. There are a few guys like you that would make excuses for critics just like Scn makes excuses for Hubbard.
It's not OK when they do it and it's not OK when critics do it. Truth is more important than the "high ground".