Breaking news - Keith Henson detained by authorities - AGAIN

A place to post and debate the Church of Scientology.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Thu May 31, 2007 7:10 am

lostinspace wrote:Actually, Sponge after looking up the HEC number, its the Civil Case against Keith for harrassing the Church.

Ever hear of the End of Endless Interiorization Rundown? Well, poor Keith just needs an end to the endless legal battles he has had and its not quite over yet. Sighs, he's been beaten up for a very long time by CO$. I spend quite a bit of time researching all the motions and hearings. I don't know how any one couldnt have high blood pressure after all the harrassing he took. He has my best wishes and I truly truly things work out for him in the long run. The man deserves some peace and a life to live. I also looked up his attorney Mark Werksman and he appears to be no slouch either.
Oops, my mistake. Yeah it was the civil limited case regarding the "anti-free speech" injuction not just for Keith but for anyone supposedly connected.
LINK to court case HEC009673, CLICK HERE

Keith posted a motion to correct judgement on that case, which was filed on 28th March.

If you look at the timeline in the case notes in the link above, it seems strangely convenient that on 28th March when Keith filed the motion to correct judgement, the court on that same day appears to have immediately set a date of 31st May for the hearing on that civil case. Almost seems like the extradition schedule etc was all preplanned. I mean on the 28th March, how would they know Keith would be in a jail in Riverside before 31st May - or were they just gonna have a hearing whether he was there or not?

Anyway, on the 17th May, the clam plaintiffs Dezotell, Wagoner & Hoden filed an objection to it the motion. (you can see all these by clicking on the camera icons on the far right of the table to get the original PDF documents). At 15 pages, plus a 30 page request for judicial notice, plus reams of Keith's ARS postings from this year in a declaration from Rhea Smith the Co$ internet spy, it all seems to be extremely OTT for a response.

-------------------------

Yeah, and Keith has my very best wishes too. I can't physically do much to help directly but I hope what little I have done here and elswhere has will continue to help make more people aware.

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Thu May 31, 2007 7:29 am

lostinspace wrote:Okies dokies Morsicle .... as long as we are on the same page :wink:

I'm no legal pundit and don't try to be. Just did a little research on that webpage. I mean if it wasn't for a real person named Keith Henson the idea of an 60 something man wielding a picket all by himself "scaring" and "threatening" a large group of any people who have security guards, it would be funny beyond words. What was he going to do? Smack them with the sign? I hope the judge sees this. CO$ I noticed used alot of email posts as evidence to substantiate their claims, its all there if ya peruse it all. I was like OMG how the hell did they get any conviction on that evidence. Its a bunch of hooey.
You know, that's really kinda where it's at. I mean is it really that frikkin hard for the judge to take his head from out of his ass, stand back from the circus and take a good look at the whole big stupid picture? It's a comedy, but nobody is laughing except the cult.
This kind of thing just drives me on and makes me ever more determined to being a part of bringing down this disgusting cult.
Karma will come round and the cult will get their just deserves, and I wanna be right there sticking the proverbial boot in.

User avatar
lermanet_com
Posts: 4149
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 11:00 am
Location: Hop-Skip Away from Scientology TODAY!
Contact:

Post by lermanet_com » Thu May 31, 2007 2:01 pm

For what it is worth...

The following is NOT from arel,

from the recent dearth of information coming from Arel, I must make an assumption based on prior experience with tough lawyers.. that Arel has been told by the lawyer to STFU and let him fix the mess.

This is GOOD NEWS, and means only good things for Keith, whose past problems in their entirety stem from inadequate or no legal counsel
versus a mad dog cult of sociopaths with ex-wholesale-porno lawyers for the mob, choreographing the show.
Do you THINK scientology works?
Then read [url=http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=20255&start=285]THIS PAGE[/url] here on XENU.NET

User avatar
tom_
Posts: 5886
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2002 7:13 pm
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Contact:

Post by tom_ » Thu May 31, 2007 2:45 pm

lermanet_com wrote:For what it is worth...

The following is NOT from arel,

from the recent dearth of information coming from Arel, I must make an assumption based on prior experience with tough lawyers.. that Arel has been told by the lawyer to STFU and let him fix the mess.

That would be good.

This is GOOD NEWS, and means only good things for Keith, whose past problems in their entirety stem from inadequate or no legal counsel

Finding a lawyer with the kahunas to go up against the thugs, is indeed a very difficult task. Been there.

versus a mad dog cult of sociopaths with ex-wholesale-porno lawyers for the mob, choreographing the show.


...and that too! :shock:

<<<>>>

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Thu May 31, 2007 4:57 pm

Oh and not to forget...

A BIG HELLO TO RHEA SMITH. THE SELF CONFESSED "INTERNET MONITOR" WORKING FOR THE "CHURCH" OF $CIENTOLOGY WHO IS READING ALL THIS.
DON'T FORGET TO COLLATE *ALL* THE INTERNET POSTINGS EH, RHEA?. YOU KNOW, THE BARRAGE OF POSTINGS FROM YOUR CULT, DONE ANONYMOUSLY, WHICH INSULT, HARASS AND DEFAME KEITH HENSON.

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Thu May 31, 2007 8:35 pm

Limited Civil Case HEC009673 wrote: 05/31/2007 STIPULATION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COURT COMMISSIONER AS TEMPORARY JUDGE FILED.
Hmm, where's the proper judge for the hearing today?
More specifically, who wants the court commissioner appointed as temporary judge?

More news later, as it comes in.

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:33 pm

A PDF document of the above stipulation is now available on the page for the civil case HEC009673
http://public-access.riverside.courts.c ... penAccess/

Plaintiff has signed it but not Keith.
Court Commissioner appointed as Temporary Judge is named as: Kathleen Jacobs.

That's all for now.

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:18 am

01 Jun 2007: Henson reports on the journey from Arizona to California (25th May)....
http://www.operatingthetan.com/extradit ... 05-25.html

User avatar
programmer_guy
Posts: 8877
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:55 am
Location: Somewhere far beyond the land of Oz.

Post by programmer_guy » Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:34 am

Commissioners are allowed to preside over certain parts of cases. They look and act just like judges in limited ways.

I believe that a "real" judge has to have the final say in a case. However, unless the commissioner has made an important mistake, it's more or less a "rubber stamp" approval.

Would anyone else chime in here with more knowledge than me?

freeway
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 10:49 pm

Post by freeway » Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:45 pm

Any news on Keith and how he's doing in California?

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:47 pm

freeway wrote:Any news on Keith and how he's doing in California?
Usually John Dorsay keeps us updated via www.operatingthetan.com which I check every day but its been relatively quiet.
Nothing new on the civil case since I last posted on that.

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:39 pm

John Dorsay posted on ARS today...
John Dorsay, on ARS earlier, wrote: Keith hasn't answered letters only because he can't get envelopes or
stamps until he can get access to the commissary. He got to fill
out the form this week, and hopes to be able to buy envelopes and
stamps on the next commissary day. Then he can answer mail. He
appreciates the mail he's getting.


John
If you would like to write directly to Keith, use the following address....

HENSON, HOWARD KEITH.
Booking Number: 200725160
Robert Presley Detention Center
PO Box 710
Riverside, CA 92501


Please double check on the IIS website in case the information changes...
http://inmate1.riversidesheriff.org/iis ... =200725160

Please see this site for the strict rules on sending mail and money...
http://www.riversidesheriff.org/correct ... index.html

Needless to say, all incoming inmate mail is screened so please don't give them reason to reject it.

freeway
Posts: 606
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2001 10:49 pm

Post by freeway » Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:08 pm

Thanks for the address, Sponge. Hope he gets a whole bunch of mail.
Mine will be going out tomorrow!

User avatar
Daffodilenator
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 5:55 pm

Post by Daffodilenator » Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:56 am

I have a question: if we want to send Keith a money order for his account, do we send it in an envelope addressed to him? Or does it have to be addressed to an official at the detention center?

Thanks,

User avatar
Sponge
Posts: 14692
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Location: U.K.

Post by Sponge » Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:41 am

Daffodilenator wrote:I have a question: if we want to send Keith a money order for his account, do we send it in an envelope addressed to him? Or does it have to be addressed to an official at the detention center?

Thanks,
See the link I gave above on money and mail policy.
Note that this is merely "spending money" for Keith. If you wish to donate to the "defence fund" then go to www.operatingthetan.com for details.

Post Reply

Return to “Opinions & Debate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests