One opened, more to come!
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:58 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 4:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10183
Location: The Mojave Desert
tamasin-sp wrote:
...Who is this Michael Meisener?

In 1971 according to many reports I have read there was a Susan Meisner aboard the Apollo who supposedly committed suicide. I say supposedly because the report I read didn't sound like suicide, in fact all the reports I read didn't sound like suicide

Were these two people related? I need to know.

Thank you in advance for your help.

Tamasin-sp, can you please reference, document, or post the reports you have read? What you seem to be implying here, and forgive me if I am incorrect, is a posited Michael/Susan Meisner relationship that has an eerie similarity to Ken Moxon and the "accidental death" of his daughter.

*****
IMO, a post-DM Scientology led by the Shadow Government carries with it the possibility to open up many, many files that are now heavily secured; some have even suggested that the most sensitive files are locked deep underground in the vaults at Trementina, NM and Petrolia, CA. These files date back decades and may include data related to CSC, RRF, and various Cult front groups that may be entirely unknown outside of CST.

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 9:23 pm
Posts: 487
Location: All over the place
Tamasin-sp, can you please reference, document, or post the reports you have read? What you seem to be implying here, and forgive me if I am incorrect, is a posited Michael/Susan Meisner relationship that has an eerie similarity to Ken Moxon and the "accidental death" of his daughter.

Sorry Mr. Swift, it seems I have made a mistake. Its Susan Meister and her Father George Meister. Can't find the doc I would have liked to have shown but here is a chapter from "a piece of blue sky"by Jon Atak:

http://www.clambake.org/archive/books/apobs/bs4-4.htm

The other man in question is a Michael Meisner, a member of the GO.

http://www.instinct.org/texts/bluesky/bs5-2.htm

The surnames are very similar and so are the time frames.

I wouldn't have brought it up, only it has bothered me for some time. The death of Susan Meister,that is. This happened less than a year after I left the Apollo.

I can't stress enough the insanity aboard the Apollo and reading the letter Susan sent to her parents depicts exactly how exhuberent initially most Scientologists were, on that ship, I couldn't see it.

Susan also wrote "Truth is stranger than fiction" strangely enough that is a saying I use freqently, only I add "Truth is stranger than science fiction" and thats what we lived on the Apollo - Science fiction was a reality.

A quote from LRH that frequently comes to mind is:

There is nothing as wild as in the books of man as will probably happen here on earth. And it will happen simply because all of this is so incredible that nobody will even think of stopping it until it is far, far too late.

That comes to mind every time I see this man, in my face as a 12 year old telling me "this is all so crazy, don't even think of telling anyone, because nobody will ever believe you" and I believed him out of fear.

On the front page of Operation Clambake under Sea Org. (can't get this url to come up)
Scroll down to A Greek KR from1995, just below is a picture of a student being thrown overboard. The man on the left, in a white peaked cap and sunglasses. Scroll down further and there is more about Susan Meister.

Thank you Andreas for having all this stuff right here on Clambake. Sorry Mr. Swift if I have derailed your thread

_________________
Look at our brokenness.
We know that in all Creation
Only the human family
Has strayed from the sacred way.

Teach us love,compassion,honour
That we may heal the earth
And heal each other.(part of an Ojibway prayer)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10183
Location: The Mojave Desert
tamasin-sp, thank you for the clarification. Wat you have posted ultimately goes to my essential view that Scientology can only be understood if one accepts the premise that it was designed to be surreal, i.e. to have its own alternative reality system that is inherently strange, brutal, insular, addictive, and hostile to outsiders.

The Cult's innate hostility and surreality -- coupled with its addicting endorphin avalanches that it calls "Free Theta" and I have called "Electronic Opium" -- creates a self-reinforcing reality structure from which it is hard to escape. The structure is hard for outsiders to comprehend or understand because Scientology is not innately reasonable or logical. Rather, Scientology fills some deep seated need for spiritual enlightenment where spiritual enlightenment is unconsciously defined as the desire for self-punishment, the punishment of others, and a final Oblivion that results in the destruction of one's own tortured sense of self. The False Euphoria, the False Bliss, and the False Wins are but happy forms of denial that affirm nothing except the need for the next step on the Bridge, the next service, repair, course, or purification.

Scientology creates its own necessity. The Cult drives this necessity by a chronic and false sense of urgency. Blind, unquestioning urgency drives Scientologists to do whatever it takes to fulfill Scientology's necessity. L. Ron Hubbard's biography -- his words, policies, and purposes -- are the necessity of all Scientologists: There is no higher purpose than to serve the purpose of L. Ron Hubbard. Self must be sacrificed to Scientology because L. Ron Hubbard would have it no other way. When Hubbard said "all men are my slaves" he was serious.

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 1:45 pm
Posts: 164
tamasin-sp wrote:
Thank you Andreas for having all this stuff right here on Clambake. Sorry Mr. Swift if I have derailed your thread



Tamasin - you were there. Your comments are so valuable, please continue!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 8:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:17 pm
Posts: 4980
Bump to add the blurb about Hubbard's military record that was printed in the Feb 2011 New Yorker article.

Quote:
At the meeting, Davis and I also discussed Hubbard’s war record. His voice filling with emotion, he said that, if it was true that Hubbard had not been injured, then “the injuries that he handled by the use of Dianetics procedures were never handled, because they were injuries that never existed; therefore, Dianetics is based on a lie; therefore, Scientology is based on a lie.” He concluded, “The fact of the matter is that Mr. Hubbard was a war hero.”

In the binders that Davis provided, there was a letter from the U.S. Naval Hospital in Oakland, dated December 1, 1945. The letter states that Hubbard had been hospitalized that year for a duodenal ulcer, but was “technically pronounced ‘fit for duty.’ ” This was the same period during which Hubbard claimed to have been blinded and lame. Davis had highlighted a passage: “Eyesight very poor, beginning with conjunctivitis actinic in 1942. Lame in right hip from service connected injury. Infection in bone. Not misconduct, all service connected.” Davis added later that, according to Robert Heinlein, Hubbard’s ankles had suffered a “drumhead-type injury”; this can result, Davis explained, “when the ship is torpedoed or bombed.”

Davis acknowledged that some of Hubbard’s medical records did not appear to corroborate Hubbard’s version of events. But Scientology had culled other records that did confirm Hubbard’s story, including documents from the National Archives in St. Louis. The man who did the research, Davis said, was “Mr. X.”

Davis explained, “Anyone who saw ‘J.F.K.’ remembers a scene on the Mall where Kevin Costner’s character goes and meets with a man named Mr. X, who’s played by Donald Sutherland.” In the film, Mr. X is an embittered intelligence agent who explains that the Kennedy assassination was actually a coup staged by the military-industrial complex. In real life, Davis said, Mr. X was Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty, who had worked in the Office of Special Operations. (Oliver Stone, who directed “J.F.K.,” says that Mr. X was a composite character, based in part on Prouty.) In the eighties, Prouty worked as a consultant for Scientology.

“We finally got so frustrated with this point of conflicting medical records that we took all of Mr. Hubbard’s records to Fletcher Prouty,” Davis told me. “He actually solved the conundrum for us.” According to Davis, Prouty explained to the church representatives that, because Hubbard had an “intelligence background,” his records were subjected to a process known as “sheep-dipping.” Davis explained that this was military parlance for “what gets done to a set of records for an intelligence officer. And, essentially, they create two sets.” He said, “Fletcher Prouty basically issued an affidavit saying L. Ron Hubbard’s records were sheep-dipped.” Prouty died in 2001.

Davis later sent me a copy of what he said was a document that confirmed Hubbard’s heroism: a “Notice of Separation from the U.S. Naval Service,” dated December 6, 1945. The document specifies medals won by Hubbard, including a Purple Heart with a Palm, implying that he was wounded in action twice. But John E. Bircher, the spokesman for the Military Order of the Purple Heart, wrote to me that the Navy uses gold and silver stars, “NOT a palm,” to indicate multiple wounds. Davis included a photograph of medals that Hubbard supposedly won. Two of the medals in the photograph weren’t even created until after Hubbard left active service.

After filing a request with the National Archives in St. Louis, The New Yorker obtained what archivists assured us were Hubbard’s complete military records—more than nine hundred pages. Nowhere in the file is there mention of Hubbard’s being wounded in battle or breaking his feet. X-rays taken of Hubbard’s right shoulder and hip showed calcium deposits, but there was no evidence of any bone or joint disease in his ankle.

There is a “Notice of Separation” in the records, but it is not the one that Davis sent me. The differences in the two documents are telling. The St. Louis document indicates that Hubbard earned four medals for service, but they reflect no distinction or valor. In the church document, his job preference after the service is listed as “Studio (screen writing)”; in the official record, it is “uncertain.” The church document indicates, falsely, that Hubbard completed four years of college, obtaining a degree in civil engineering. The official document correctly notes two years of college and no degree.

On the church document, the commanding officer who signed off on Hubbard’s separation was “Howard D. Thompson, Lt. Cmdr.” The file contains a letter, from 2000, to another researcher, who had written for more information about Thompson. An analyst with the National Archives responded that the records of commissioned naval officers at that time had been reviewed, and “there was no Howard D. Thompson listed.”

The church, after being informed of these discrepancies, said, “Our expert on military records has advised us that, in his considered opinion, there is nothing in the Thompson notice that would lead him to question its validity.” Eric Voelz, an archivist who has worked at the St. Louis archive for three decades, looked at the document and pronounced it a forgery.



Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011 ... z1DLl1zSgi

_________________
"A man may build himself a throne of bayonets, but he cannot sit on it." -William Ralph Inge

Watch the Los Angeles press conference here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/ScilonTV#p/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:34 pm
Posts: 546
Location: Texas
"...if it was true that Hubbard had not been injured, then “the injuries that he handled by the use of Dianetics procedures were never handled, because they were injuries that never existed; therefore, Dianetics is based on a lie; therefore, Scientology is based on a lie.”

This caused quite a stir over on Marty's blog, but they eventually all agreed that it didn't matter.

_________________
When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
-- Dave Barry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:48 am
Posts: 1156
Elwood, that's great they're talking about that. They may all end up suppressing that info in their own heads, but it wouldn't be a surprise if at least one of them thinks more about it, and starts to wake up.

_________________
“...the injuries that {Hubbard} handled by the use of Dianetics procedures were never handled, because they were injuries that never existed; therefore, Dianetics is based on a lie; therefore, Scientology is based on a lie.” --Tommy Davis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2011 11:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10183
Location: The Mojave Desert
elwood wrote:
"...if it was true that Hubbard had not been injured, then “the injuries that he handled by the use of Dianetics procedures were never handled, because they were injuries that never existed; therefore, Dianetics is based on a lie; therefore, Scientology is based on a lie.”

What Tommy Davis said contradicted the old mantra "I dont care about what LRH did or did not do; Scientology works!" In this newest assertion, Tommy Davis put all of Scientology at risk by staking the game on LRH's war injuries -- and in a rather caviler fashion at that.

I read Tommy Davis' quote as David Miscavige and his lawyers pushing the Indies to the edge of the cliff in a game of brinkmanship. LRH is strictly off limits for doctrinaire Scientologists and Tommy Davis raised the ante for all Scientologists inside and outside of the Church by saying what he did. The Indies must agree with DM on this point. This was a way for CoS to assert its authority over LRH's legacy in a way that the Indies must concede. This could be seen as CoS desperately looking for some common ground.

It is interesting that DM was willing pose a great common threat to CoS members and Indies alike. DM has always been a go for broke gambler; however, he covered his bet by having a disposable Tommy Davis stake everything on one of the weakest links in the chain in terms of LRH's biography. Dave can always toss Tommy under the bus if this remark goes viral.

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 2:48 am
Posts: 1156
I don't know... I get the impression Davis didn't plan to say that. It looked as if it just came out, and he didn't realise the ramifications of that statement. In a related story, I imagine Davis is in a lot of trouble with Miscavige, and Miscavige is probably close to critical mass with rage.

_________________
“...the injuries that {Hubbard} handled by the use of Dianetics procedures were never handled, because they were injuries that never existed; therefore, Dianetics is based on a lie; therefore, Scientology is based on a lie.” --Tommy Davis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:33 am
Posts: 1362
Simonymous wrote:
I don't know... I get the impression Davis didn't plan to say that. It looked as if it just came out, and he didn't realise the ramifications of that statement. In a related story, I imagine Davis is in a lot of trouble with Miscavige, and Miscavige is probably close to critical mass with rage.


What happens when DM reaches that "critical mass" with rage?

Pete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10183
Location: The Mojave Desert
Simonymous wrote:
I don't know... I get the impression Davis didn't plan to say that. It looked as if it just came out, and he didn't realise the ramifications of that statement. In a related story, I imagine Davis is in a lot of trouble with Miscavige, and Miscavige is probably close to critical mass with rage.

Simonymous, this may be an end game for all anyone knows. Tommy Davis basically challenged the historical record in a bet Scientology cannot possibly win. Like Hitler wanting to burn down Germany at the end of war, DM may want to destroy Scientology itself if he cannot be its unchallenged Dictator. Look, DM is insane. He could damn well take Scientology off a cliff if he cannot be God in that universe. The way he could do is to have Tommy Davis say something that pits the US Navy against Scientology. This is Spooky Deja Vu for Scientology.

*****
When I created this image in 2006 I saw it as the likely outcome for DM. Maybe DM so fears an arrest that he is placing Scientology itself at risk by having Tommy challenge the integrity of US Navy records? Perhaps all that now stands in the gap is Danny Sherman's florid pen.

Hasta la Vista Dave!

Image

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:34 pm
Posts: 546
Location: Texas
CoS definitely does not want to screw with the U.S. Navy. There are many "stolen Valor" organizations out there who take this stuff very seriously and many of us who support them have friends in high places still. The recent aborted L. Ron Hubbard ceremony at the Naval Memorial is a good example. The memorial folks said they couldn't stop the ceremony because Hubbard was (sigh) a legitimate U. S. Navy veteran and the ceremony wasn't on government property. I think the ceremony was canceled because the "friends of L. Ron Hubbard" were afraid that the event would be heavily protested (which it would have been) by some heavy-duty veterans - not Anonymous.

Miscavige and Co. don't seem to realize how sensitive an issue this is. Obviously, Tommy doesn't, because he is trying to perpetuate the con on someone who has the facts. I had to smile at the assertion that Hubbard's records had been "sheep-dipped". That is usually the first reason given for inconsistencies between what they have said and what the records show by people accused of misrepresenting their military service.

_________________
When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
-- Dave Barry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 773
J. Swift wrote:
Simonymous wrote:
I don't know... I get the impression Davis didn't plan to say that. It looked as if it just came out, and he didn't realise the ramifications of that statement. In a related story, I imagine Davis is in a lot of trouble with Miscavige, and Miscavige is probably close to critical mass with rage.

Simonymous, this may be an end game for all anyone knows. Tommy Davis basically challenged the historical record in a bet Scientology cannot possibly win. Like Hitler wanting to burn down Germany at the end of war, DM may want to destroy Scientology itself if he cannot be its unchallenged Dictator. Look, DM is insane. He could damn well take Scientology off a cliff if he cannot be God in that universe. The way he could do is to have Tommy Davis say something that pits the US Navy against Scientology. This is Spooky Deja Vu for Scientology.


I don't think they will consider there are ramifications, as Tommy also said:

“We finally got so frustrated with this point of conflicting medical records that we took all of Mr. Hubbard’s records to Fletcher Prouty,” Davis told me. “He actually solved the conundrum for us.” According to Davis, Prouty explained to the church representatives that, because Hubbard had an “intelligence background,” his records were subjected to a process known as “sheep-dipping.” Davis explained that this was military parlance for “what gets done to a set of records for an intelligence officer. And, essentially, they create two sets.” He said, “Fletcher Prouty basically issued an affidavit saying L. Ron Hubbard’s records were sheep-dipped.” Prouty died in 2001.

They can always fall back on this claim, and stick with the story that he was indeed seriously injured during the war and the the truth is in the other set of records that of course can never be produced. I suppose they could also claim that the truth concerning his war decorations are also contained in those other records. It is an easy enough lie to stick with. Considering the entire tech that Scientology is based on is a lie, and that CoS is constantly spewing lies (hey, there are millions of Scientologists), this explanation will be a perfect out for them.

_________________
"The truth is the kindest thing we can give folks in the end." - Harriet Beecher Stowe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Version 502 of L. Ron Hubbard's Biography
PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 6:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 11:19 pm
Posts: 184
SeeYaBye wrote:
I don't think they will consider there are ramifications, as Tommy also said:

“We finally got so frustrated with this point of conflicting medical records that we took all of Mr. Hubbard’s records to Fletcher Prouty,” Davis told me. “He actually solved the conundrum for us.” According to Davis, Prouty explained to the church representatives that, because Hubbard had an “intelligence background,” his records were subjected to a process known as “sheep-dipping.” Davis explained that this was military parlance for “what gets done to a set of records for an intelligence officer. And, essentially, they create two sets.” He said, “Fletcher Prouty basically issued an affidavit saying L. Ron Hubbard’s records were sheep-dipped.” Prouty died in 2001.

They can always fall back on this claim, and stick with the story that he was indeed seriously injured during the war and the the truth is in the other set of records that of course can never be produced. I suppose they could also claim that the truth concerning his war decorations are also contained in those other records. It is an easy enough lie to stick with. Considering the entire tech that Scientology is based on is a lie, and that CoS is constantly spewing lies (hey, there are millions of Scientologists), this explanation will be a perfect out for them.

Haven't the war records of intelligence personnel been declassified by now? Over the past few years various members of the OSS in WWII whose war records were previously unavailable have been identified (such as Julia Child). I'd think it should be fairly easy to verify LRH's "other records". Of course, that would require 1) people at the top of the CoS to actually believe he was a war hero (and I'm skeptical that many of them do), and 2) an openness to the truth, a concept which is something of an oxymoron when applied to Scientology.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], psbot [Picsearch] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group