One opened, more to come!
It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 9:21 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
Image

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
Image

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
At one point, Scientology even oddly claimed that Hubbard was a professional choreographer:

Image

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
Danny Sherman has been the LRH biographer for many years now and has yet to produce an actual LRH biography. What Danny Sherman has done is to scrape the bottom of the barrel for things that make LRH seem better than he really was. Sherman twists and distorts trivial matters to hyper-inflate Hubbard. The biggest whoppers that Danny Sherman foisted upon Scientologists include:

1. LRH was the, "Architect of the US Air Force." Essentially, Hubbard ghosted a US Senate bill for a US Senator that called for the creation of a US Air Force, this as opposed to the then US Army Air Force. The June 12, 1941 date of US Senate Bill 1635 did not form the US Air Force. There are heavyweight US Military historians who have covered the formation of the US Air Force, which was created on September 18, 1947 by the National Security Act of 1947. In the 1930's, General Billy Mitchell was the leading proponent of an independent Air Force and military heroes like Curtis Le May were behind it. This is yet another attempt at "Stolen Valor" for LRH.

2. LRH's Alaskan Radio Expediton of 1940 "paved the way" for LORAN. This is demonstrably false:

Quote:
LORAN was an American development of the British GEE radio navigation system (used during World War II). While GEE had a range of about 400 miles (644 km), early LORAN systems had a range of 1,200 miles (1,930 km). LORAN systems were up and running during World War II and were used extensively by the US Navy and Royal Navy. It was originally known as "LRN" for Loomis radio navigation, after millionaire and physicist Alfred Lee Loomis, who invented LORAN and played a crucial role in military research and development during WWII.

ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LORAN

LORAN, or LRN, was already in use by 1940. LRH did not "Pave the way for global navigation." Magellan globally navigated by use of compasses and stars in 1519. Sailors were navigating the world for 420 years before LRH's Alaska trip. Pilots had navigated the world using compasses and radio direction finders before Hubbard's trip.

It is astonishing to me to see Dan Sherman's complete intellectual collapse into utter lies. LRH sailed a route that 1,000's had sailed before him. Puget Sound to Alaska was a known and familiar route. What Sherman doesn't say is that the engine on LRH's boat broke down on this trip and that LRH lived in Alaska for awhile. He borrowed $350 from the First National Bank of Ketchikan (about $4,800 today) to fix his boat. He left Alaska and skipped out on the loan. The First National Bank of Ketchikan found LRH in the US military eighteen months later and had to hound him for the money. The real story of the Alaskan Radio Expedition is that LRH was a deadbeat and that Dan Sherman is making up fairy tales.

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
Version 502, the latest LRH video documentary of LRH is inadequate because the Cult simply cannot confront the true and historical L. Ron Hubbard. Scientology and Scientologists have never been able to confront the true and historical L. Ron Hubbard, for to do so would be pure anguish. What happens in the absence of confrontation is denial. OT Laurie Hamilton demonstrates this remarkable form of denial from her perch at allexperts.com by dismissing LRH altogether and praising the Tech:

Quote:
If it (Scientology) clarifies the entire field of comparative religion and philosophy one has studied, and is helpful in handling life's upsets, raising kids, succeeding in a career, resolving conflicts and solving problems, and gives one a peace, insight and clarity of vision that one's peers envy, then it is valuable indeed. That is how I find it. I wouldn't care if I were to learn tomorrow it was developed by psychotic Martians with AIDS. I have proved its principles in my life.

ref: http://experts.about.com/q/1751/4220033.htm

*****
Essentially, L. Ron Hubbard could have been a "psychotic Martians with AIDS" and Scientologists wouldn't care. Even LRH himself said that he was not from this planet. Given the inherent denial, and even delusions, required to be a Scientologist in 2009, wouldn't it be far more honest to disband the Church of Scientology, RTC, and CST and abandon the LRH copyrights to their fate?

What is the point of a religion if there is zero integrity at its center regarding its Founder and Source? How can anyone be a Scientologist given the weight of the lies and abuse they have to tolerate and accept each day from their own church?


/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Last edited by J. Swift on Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:38 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: LRH Biographical Rundown
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:33 am
Posts: 1362
Perhaps Cof$ should develop an LRH bioraphical rundown, where the EP will be cogniting that the truth about LRH's life is whatever DM/RTC/LRH library says it is. Clearly, people need to rid themselves of the aberative consideration that truth is not subject to change. Remember, truth, by definition, always advances the interests of the Cof$.

Pete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 583
Location: Back to top
J. Swift wrote:
Garrison later wrote a book entitled, The Secrets of Scientology.

Are you referring to The Hidden Story of Scientology (Citadel, 1974), or to Playing Dirty: the Secret War Against Beliefs (Ralston-Pilot, 1980)? Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't these written earlier rather than later?
Larry Brennan wrote:
In late 82/1983 a meeting was held with Hubbard’s representatives from “Author Services” and Omar about the finished book and it was a disaster with Miscavige blowing up and Omar refusing to deal with him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
probity wrote:
J. Swift wrote:
Garrison later wrote a book entitled, The Secrets of Scientology.

Are you referring to The Hidden Story of Scientology (Citadel, 1974), or to Playing Dirty: the Secret War Against Beliefs (Ralston-Pilot, 1980)? Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't these written earlier rather than later?
Larry Brennan wrote:
In late 82/1983 a meeting was held with Hubbard’s representatives from “Author Services” and Omar about the finished book and it was a disaster with Miscavige blowing up and Omar refusing to deal with him.

Probity, that sentence should have been corrected by my, ahh, by my transcriptionist you see. However, fluoridation in that water has sapped her precious natural bodily fluids. Communists you know.

Omar did write two pro-Scientology books prior to being contracted to write the LRH bio. The book to which LB refers appears to be the LRH bio. That turned into a debacle because Omar Garrison, unfortunately for Scientology, had integrity as a writer and was not going to write a puff piece. Such puffery, according to Suzie Engram, was left to an LRH publicist. IMO, no one inside of Scientology had ever dared to question LRH on his bogus credentials. I think they took him at his word. Imagine, then, the shock at the top when Miscavige discovered from Garrison that LRH was FOS. This is one of those early turning points in DM's overthrow of GO and MSH where he starts to realize the enormity and profitability of the con. This is where DM starts calling the shots because he can, because he has seized power, and because he needs to.

DM makes much ado about purging GO, but he never really did. He merely offloaded MSH and her loyalists. As a legacy of the DM's takeover, LRH's bogus Biography remained in place for another 20+ years; further proof that DM never had any real intention to clean up Scientology. DM's intent was to merely restructure to the beast in order to compartmentalize it and made it harder to sue Scientology in its many new pieces.

*****
The bottom line is what the critics have always said: Scientology was founded upon lies, and, its Founder L. Ron Hubbard was a fraud. This is why Scientology's persistence as a mass-movement is now in a state of rampant collapse. Example: The collapse of LRH's once formidable biography has now been reduced to the "truthfully inactive" OSAbot SuzanneMarie squabbling with me over the trivial horse-riding abilities of the three year old LRH. Gone are the fake WWII medals; the Ph.D. from Sequoia's University; Ron the nuclear physicist, the civil engineer, and the "blind and crippled" man who healed himself at the end of WWII by use of Dianetics.

Scientologists refuse to understand and instead stare blankly into their "precision needle movement" E-Meters, wondering how this all happened, particularly Anonymous. Tom Cruise and DM were supposed to have boomed the Orgs in 2005. That never happened, but Anonymous did. So did the Old Guard. So did many other things that caused the surcease of Scientology. All we are waiting for is the fat lady to sing, and that should happen soon enough my friends. The fat lady will sing, for she knows that she has to do the right thing or face the consequences.

*****
Oh Norman Starkey! Oh Lyman Spurlock! Where are you now that Mr. Hubbard really needs you?

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 6:24 pm
Posts: 2992
Location: Pacific Northwest
caroline wrote:
SuzanneMarie wrote:
probity wrote:
The Weird and Truthfully Inactive SuzanneMarie...
SuzanneMarie wrote:
Who says he was a civil engineer?
Why, LRH says he's a civil engineer (C.E.) and a nuclear physicist, SuzanneMarie!
Hubbard, "P.E. Handout", HCO Information Letter of 14 April 1961 wrote:
Developed by L. Ron Hubbard, C.E., Ph.D., a nuclear physicist, Scientology has demonstrably achieved this long-sought goal. Doctor Hubbard, educated in advanced physics and higher mathematics and also a student of Sigmund Freud and others, began his present researches thirty years ago at George Washington University.
http://www.carolineletkeman.org/sp/images/stories/hcopl/hco-info-ltr-pe-handout.pdf


I don't think LRH wrote the HCO Information letter in question. He used to have a publicist who wrote grossly exaggerated puff stuff about him, something like that dramatic wartime propaganda newspaper article that called him a descendant of many naval heroes (he wasn't). Since CoS did not exist during WWII then you can't blame them for it.

Oh, and when did I proclaim myself as an expert? It doesn't sound like me.

And your remarks about OSA controlling everything that CoS members do, are untrue and thoroughly odd.


David Miscavige also published Hubbard's HCO Information Letter 14 April 1961 PE Handout in the 1991 edition of the Technical Bulletins. (Volume VI pp. 90-95) I'll post the complete information letter in the public interest, along with the title and copyright pages.

http://www.carolineletkeman.org/sp/imag ... andout.pdf

HCO Information Letter 14 April 1961 PE Handout by L. Ron Hubbard wrote:
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO INFORMATION LETTER OF 14 APRIL 1961

Do Not Remimeo
Print for PE Use in the Magazine
2 Copies to Each Central Org

PE HANDOUT

The following releases should be attractively letterpressed on small individual sheets and are each one a part of the Auto Eval Packet, HCO Policy Letter 2 March 1961.

IMPORTANT: This is "What Is Scientology?" the release required to be given PE test people as per HCO Policy Letter of 2 March 1961, number 3 of the 8 items.

Number 7 (The State of Release) has already come to you as part of a recent Info Letter, and is repeated here, together with numbers 4, 5 and 6. Numbers 1 and 2 will be sent to you shortly.

WHAT IS SCIENTOLOGY?

For hundreds of years physical scientists have been seeking to apply the exact knowledge they had gained of the physical universe to man and his problems.

Newton, Sir James Jeans, Einstein, have all sought to find the exact laws of human behavior in order to help mankind.

Developed by L. Ron Hubbard, a nuclear physicist, Scientology has demonstrably achieved this long-sought goal. Doctor Hubbard, educated in advanced physics and higher mathematics and also a student of Sigmund Freud and others, began his present researches thirty years ago at George Washington University. The dramatic result has been Scientology, the first major and complete breakthrough by the exact sciences into the field of the humanities. Although taken from the material sciences, Scientology is dedicated in the finest tradition of human dignity and freedom espoused by brilliant men in all periods of man's ascendancy over his relationship to the animal. The laws of this science proved to be startlingly simple when found, well within the grasp of the average person. It is a tenet of Scientology that this knowledge belongs to man, not in the forbidding halls of learning. It is the science of the man, the woman and the child in the street. It belongs to us, the people, not to any vested interest on Earth.

Scientology means the "study of knowledge." Scio is knowing in the fullest sense of the word, and logos, study.

90

Scientology is today the only successfully validated psychotherapy in the world. Tens of thousands of completely documented cases exist in the files of the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International.

Scientology has many "firsts." These include:

Scientology is a precision science. It is the first precision science in the field of the humanities. Yet it is sufficiently simple and rapid that where it requires twelve years to train a psychiatrist, eight weeks of heavy Scientology training can permit a person to achieve results. However, for a truly skilled Scientologist, the training period for a doctorate in the subject is usually not under five years and has been ten years.

Ample records exist to substantiate these firsts. Further, the results of Scientology are easily demonstrable claims that can be duplicated by competent practitioners at will using Scientology principles correctly.

The first axiomatic construction of the basic laws of thought and behavior in man.

The first science to isolate the life unit that perceives and generates energy, a discovery comparable to the isolation of the nucleus in atomic physics.

The first science to prove that IQ and intelligence can be improved and are not inherent in a person.

The first science to discover and isolate the reactive or subconscious mind.

The first science to isolate and classify accurately the twenty-four parts of the human mind. Previous to Scientology only the brain, the body, Freud's subconscious and Pavlov's stimulus-response law were known. Scientology has clarified these four and has discovered an additional twenty parts, any one of them more important to man in his efforts to bring peace and order to his environment and Earth.

The first science to determine accurately the honesty and potential character of people by invariable instrument means.

The first mental science to subject itself to the most severe validation tests.

The first science to establish a new state or condition for man which exceeds earlier concepts of man's potential. This alone in Scientology remains expensive due to the skilled attention it requires but is usually a quarter the price of an analysis.

The first science to put the cost of psychotherapy within the range of any person's pocketbook. A complete Freudian analysis cost three to five thousand pounds. Better results can be achieved in Scientology for ten pounds and, on a group basis, for shillings.

The first science to make whole classes of backward children averagely bright using only drills the teacher can do a few minutes each day.

The first science to determine the basic cause of disease.

91

The first science to contain exact technology to routinely alleviate physical illnesses with completely predictable success.

The first science of mind to prove conclusively that physical illness can stem from mental disturbance, a fact which Freud held only as a theory, and only seldom demonstrated.

Dianetics is a sub-subject of Scientology and covers the anatomy of the mind rather than the brain. "Dia"—through; "nous"—mind.

In its early years Dianetics and Scientology, representing the severe viewpoint of the physical sciences, were considered highly controversial. Since that time many of its minor discoveries have been borrowed by the humanities.

A host of famous names have passed through Scientology clinics. But it is against association policy to reveal their identities just as the association protects their secrets.

The Code of a Scientologist, under which Scientologists practice, is the most severe ethical code known to physical or mental groups or practices. In addition to other points, a practitioner must return a patient's fees if therapy is not considered successful. Only an average of one case in all the thousands treated in any year over the whole world ever requests a return of fees and these are immediately refunded. A practitioner may be dismissed from the association and forbidden to practice if he violates any single part of the code.

Scientology erects no barriers to anyone by reason of religion or political affiliations; Scientology has no quarrel with the practitioners of other schools and its materials are always fully available to them, but they may not use them on patients unless the practitioner is also trained in Scientology. Medical and psychiatric degrees do not grant the right of practice of Scientology.

Scientology practitioners are called "auditors" —"one who listens and computes." Scientology auditors are available to service in any mental health activity in (country) on a paid or voluntary basis, but by association regulations, may not take staff posts in institutions which practice therapies such as electric shock which can physically harm patients.

Scientologists do not use drugs or hypnotism. They employ only their exact knowledge of the human mind.

The fullest results of Scientology are available in (city).

Scientology Central Organizations exist on every continent and centers exist in most large cities. The principal Scientology organization in the world is the Hubbard Association of Scientologists International. The "HASI" in (city) controls all Scientology in (country). It is located at (address).

The "HASI" is (country's) largest mental health organization and has a dozen practitioners for every one in other mental practices.

92

The association is not political in nature. It is humanitarian. By International Board resolution of long standing every Central Organization and its staff is admonished to be loyal to the government in power in the country where it exists and not espouse political controversies.

THE CHEAPEST WAY

The easiest and least expensive way to improve your life is to take a Personal Efficiency Course and then the HAS Co-audit.

This is the lowest cost-effective mental help on Earth.

It is very little trouble to put into effect.

You go five evenings the first week and only three evenings a week afterwards.

By giving help to another person like yourself and receiving help from him you improve your IQ and personality.

Tens of thousands of graphs like the one you have received have been enormously improved by the "PE" route.

Expert, qualified Scientologists are supervising you every moment of the way on the "PE" route.

It is all good fun as well and you will come to know some of the finest people you ever met—people like you who have just taken a test and now want to do something about it.

All you have to do is see the Consultant. Just say "I want to take the PE" and you will be signed up at once.

A few days after you will be wanting to thank us all for having opened this door for you.

Your future depends entirely on either fate or upon your taking the "PE Course."

Sign up and make some new friends for yourself and a new life.

THE FASTEST WAY

The quickest way to change your graph, raise your IQ and alter your future is to see the Consultant and procure individual processing.

A highly skilled and experienced Scientologist will give you fast intensive processing daily for a week or as long as you require.

93

The processing consists of getting you to look at and break through all the barriers you've erected between yourself and your goals.

No drug, hypnotism or psychiatry is used. Only various mental drills that lead you out into life instead of on down into the steady grind.

Thousands of persons have been individually processed around the world with the greatest success.

Be sure you will be in good hands.

We are friends of yours.

We want you to be as well a friend to yourself.

If you want the fastest way, see the Consultant and say "I want individual processing."

It is more costly than the PE route but it is a thousand times faster.

Remember, only Scientology discovered IQ could be bettered, personality improved and one's fate altered. And individual processing is the fastest, surest way.

The Hubbard Guidance Center is there to help you.

THE EDUCATIONAL WAY

There are many books on the subject of Scientology.

By reading them you can help yourself at very little expense.

The following is the available book list. Buy the copies you want from the Receptionist.

(List available books and prices.)

THE STATE OF RELEASE

The purpose of Scientology is to make the able more able.

There are several grades of ability in Scientology. The first of these is the general state of the unprocessed human being, or "the average person."

The first level above this is that of "Scientology Release."

A Release is precisely defined as one who has no psychotic or neurotic tendencies of any kind and has a certainty that he will get no worse.

Technically, a Release is one whose graph has been raised by processing and whose IQ has been improved.

94

This is done by Scientology processing obtainable from the Hubbard Guidance Center or from the "HAS Co-audit" (Do It Yourself Processing).

It is a wonderful thing to be able to attain the status of a "Release." For one is now more cause over life and is less the effect of his environment.

Far above "Release" are other states of being such as "Clear." However, this is a goal much more distant. One's first target is a "Scientology Release." Now one has a happier future, is luckier and more able to cope with life.

A "Release" certificate is issued without charge by the Hubbard Guidance Center or the PE Foundation to anyone whose test clearly demonstrates that he or she has attained this state.

It is a grand feeling to be a "Scientology Release."

Try it.

L. RON HUBBARD
Founder
95


Hubbard, L. R. (1991). The technical bulletins of dianetics and scientology. Los Angeles, Calif: Bridge Publications.


See also this a.r.s. post by Mark Plummer regarding this issue.

The document sounds and walks exactly like Hubbard.

----
Edit: DM also published HCO Information Letter 14 April 1961 PE Handout in OEC Vol 6 pp. 293-298.

Hubbard, L. R. (1991). The organization executive course. Los Angeles: Bridge Publications.

In the Mark Plummer's post above, he cited to HCO PL 2 March 1961 Automatic Evaluation Packet For PE Foundation. That PL is published on p. 292 of OEC Vol 6 (1991).


It doesn't matter.

I've read some old material that Mary Sue Hubbard wrote about how she wanted St. Hill staff to treat her children (she did not want them picked up and whirled around, for instance) and it was signed Mary Sue Hubbard.

Later on it turned up as an issue about how to treat children, in general.
And it was signed L. Ron Hubbard.

Not everything with that sig on it was written by LRH.

Conversely, I'm sure the awful stuff Gerry Armstrong attributes to LRH was never written by him. In this I include the Admissions and much of the defamatory crap Swift rants about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Posts: 14692
Location: U.K.
SuzanneMarie wrote:

Conversely, I'm sure the awful stuff Gerry Armstrong attributes to LRH was never written by him. In this I include the Admissions and much of the defamatory crap Swift rants about.


Sure you're sure? Dox or GTFO.

_________________
WWW.XENU-DIRECTORY.NET Awesome document/media resources
Other Activism: Divided By Zero forum, Why We Protest forum
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 583
Location: Back to top
The Weird and Truthfully Inactive SuzanneMarie...
SuzanneMarie wrote:
It doesn't matter.

I've read some old material that Mary Sue Hubbard wrote about how she wanted St. Hill staff to treat her children (she did not want them picked up and whirled around, for instance) and it was signed Mary Sue Hubbard.

Later on it turned up as an issue about how to treat children, in general.
And it was signed L. Ron Hubbard.

Not everything with that sig on it was written by LRH.

The Admissions of SuzanneMarie:

* It doesn't matter what evidence of LRH falsehoods exists.

* Claims of LRH degrees not earned are merely puff and not intended to deceive the public or fraudulently influence opinions toward LRH or Scientology, even if these claims appear on book covers.

* LRH stood to gain nothing from false credentials as a Civil Engineer. Ph.D. and nuclear physicist, therefore LRH had no motive to falsify his own credentials.

* All claims of LRH being a Civil Engineer. Ph.D. and nuclear physicist result from the mere incompetence of others and do not reflect adversely on LRH's personal character.

* Not everything with an LRH signature on it was written by LRH, therefore LRH did not have the means to falsify his credentials, only the means to falsify his authorship.

* LRH would never accuse others of similar false claims in such a hurtful way, so derogatory, so offensive and so bigoted.

* Far too busy working and researching to concern himself with such petty inaccuracies, LRH had neither the opportunity to falsify his credentials nor the opportunity to notice these fraudulent claims of Civil Engineer. Ph.D. and nuclear physicist even existed.

* Lastly, I don't recall them, therefore they didn't happen - and even if they had, such inaccuracies are historical only and may now be disregarded as if they never happened.

* Move along now, trusting in the validity of the LRH imprint and the truth for which it stands.

SuzanneMarie, the inactive Scientologist, thanks for sharing your cognitive dissonance with the world.


Last edited by probity on Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Posts: 14692
Location: U.K.
Thank you Probity for that gattling gun of wisdom nuggets. ;)

/thread
Image

_________________
WWW.XENU-DIRECTORY.NET Awesome document/media resources
Other Activism: Divided By Zero forum, Why We Protest forum
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 772
Spongey, that is a most excellent GIF image! But shouldn't Larry on the right be transformed to a certain height-challenged wool-pulled-over-the-eyes actor?

_________________
"The truth is the kindest thing we can give folks in the end." - Harriet Beecher Stowe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10179
Location: The Mojave Desert
SuzanneMarie wrote:
Conversely, I'm sure the awful stuff Gerry Armstrong attributes to LRH was never written by him. In this I include the Admissions and much of the defamatory crap Swift rants about.


Dear Ms. Suzanne "Held Down Seven" Marie:

You have disputed my theory that LRH was sexually molested as a child, but my sources were all based upon Hubbard's own words and the official CoS LRH biography. Furthermore, I have used Hubbard's own background in the occult to write about the occultic, demonic, and alien manifestations in Scientology. I have additional material from Scientologists that confirm such manifestations. Former Scientologists have written to me to describe the frightening occultic experiences they endured while in spiritual bondage to Scientology.

RTC's Trementina symbol, its double diamond symbol, and even Scientology's Satanic Cross are proofs of the occult nature of Scientology. The disturbing allegations of child molestation; the strange suicides; the murder of LRH; the wanton killing of Lisa McPherson in the Introspection Rundown; the brutality of RPF; the Kali rituals: TR's the hard way, and so much more clearly demonstrate the violent, Satanic, and aberrated nature of Scientology. That the Cult began from the demonic premises described by LRH in his Admissions only serves to underscore the fact that Hubbard intentionally created Scientology to be an Occult group. However, LRH intentionally concealed and withheld the occult nature of Scientology from people until they were sufficiently indoctrinated and under his control to confront such supernatural phenomenon as the Multiple-Personality/Demonic-Possession-Experience that is the OT Levels.

*****
SuzanneMarie, you can be as bitter as you please. You can despise what I have written about Hubbard. Your bitterness, however, does not modify the Occult nature of Scientology nor does it eradicate, obviate, or negate its violent and criminal history. Your anger does not change the content of my writings. Your anger is tangential at best and contributes nothing. Your anger has aberrated you over these many years. You are in a dwindling spiral of your own making. No one is making you be the way you are: You are doing it to yourself.

Furthermore, your delusional rationalizations of the content of LRH's pathological lies cannot change the fact that LRH was a pathological liar. For you to suggest that people should not be concerned with the content of Hubbard's lies proves only that you are lying to yourself about the consequences of Hubbard's pathological lies to the Tech.

*****
Here's the thing about Pathological Liars Suzie: They have no boundaries. Thus, when you and people like Laurie Hamilton attempt to excuse LRH's lies (and his racism as well), you use a bogus form of logic that seeks to decouple LRH the Pathological Liar from LRH the Tech-Source:

LRH & His Lies Are Inconsequential.

LRH Never Lied When He Created the Tech.


The thing about Pathological Liars is that they are incapable of making any such distinctions. Because LRH was a Pathological Liar, the Tech becomes riddled with holes. We don't know what LRH lied about over the six decades that he created, re-created, re-formulated, and altered his own Tech. We have nod idea what he did and did not lie about. This problem with LRH is so enormous that David Miscavige had to invoke a fantastic tale of SP Transcriptionists in a lame attempt to explain away all of LRH's contradictions, lies, and the rest of the rather colourful lunacies for which the Commodore was infamous.

Did Ron ever actually encounter Xenu, the Wall of Fire, and BTs'? Or did he mock up the OT Levels? The Tech will be called into question for eternity because its Source was a notorious pathological liar named L. Ron Hubbard. That is why his name must be unhammered from history and thrown into Oblivion.

You see, Suzie, Hubbard painted himself and his Unhappy Fun Cult into a corner forever due to his incessant lies. There is no escaping the corner in which Scientology is trapped by the mass of LRH's lies.

Your glib rationalizations of Hubbard's lies only compound the agony of life trapped in a corner with a Tech so delicate that it can only be ultimately defended and used by first mocking up a system of personal delusions so that all of the problems can be dismissed. Willing delusion is the opposite of confrontation and explains why Scientologists have lapsed into a contra-survival mode as a group.

Best,

J. Swift

/////

_________________
Image

http://philosophyofcosmology.com/
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com


Last edited by J. Swift on Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:28 pm, edited 7 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: You folks just don't quite get it
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 8:33 am
Posts: 1362
You folks just don't get it, do you. You keep looking for the fixed, cast in concrete, unchanging biography of LRH. In doing so, you limit such a great man. LRH was/is a BIG thetan, not limited by three dimensions, the physical universe, or any other considerations of MEST that have all of your puny minds trapped. But LRH goes way past that, and so does the Cof$. Therefore, the LRH biography is THE TRUTH, and TRUTH is that story/policy/explanation of things/etc. THAT ADVANCES THE CAUSE OF THE CHURCH. End of story, everything else is Trotskyite revisionism, er, oops, the ravings of evil espee squirrels out to destroy the only hope of mankind.

Pete


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 164 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group