Hubbard and Heinlein

A place to post and debate the Church of Scientology.
User avatar
ChefXenu
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 12:32 am
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by ChefXenu » Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:23 am

It is interesting that as people investigate Heinlein's documents, evidence is being found which supports the claims of Gerry Armstrong as to the legitimacy of LRH's Affirmations. I haven't been following ARS lately, but it will be entertaining to see how roadrunner dances around the new evidence. ](*,)

Seriously though, I love this thread, and want to thank everyone who is sharing their finds here.
=D>
REB Slaughter (USN-RET)(SP V)
614-321-XENU http://www.chefxenu.net
4th (or 5th) Marcabian Invader Force Mess Saucer 1138

User avatar
elwood
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by elwood » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:21 pm

Roadrunner is posting on ARS? That ought to be good!
When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
-- Dave Barry

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Thu Feb 24, 2011 7:12 pm

The Heinlein archives and William H. Patterson Jr.'s biography Robert A. Heinlein In Dialogue with His Century provide a wealth of information about several people who were significant in Hubbard's life during the development of Dianetics/Scientology.

Patterson devotes a chapter to Leslyn MacDonald Heinlein, Robert's second wife, whom he "stole" in early 1932 from Annapolis classmate and "best friend" Cal Laning. Leslyn practiced "white witchcraft," including "warding" their "distant friends" (E.g. Ted Sturgeon who wrote to the Heinleins from London on 2 April 1946, asking Leslyn to continue her "White Magic" on him. Heinlein archives: CORR220-2.) Leslyn apparently used another color on a certain "Swanson" who annoyed her once and "a couple years later he was dead-as-dead." (Patterson 2010, p. 343).

That reminded me of the type of thing Hubbard would say of people he claimed had wronged him.
L. Ron Hubbard wrote:The only evil thing we are doing is to be good, if that makes sense to you. For by being good, things done to us out of carelessness or viciousness are all out of proportion to the evil done to others. This often applies to people who are not Scientologists. Just this year I had an electrician who robbed HCO of money with false bills and bad workmanship. One day he woke up to the fact that the Organization he was robbing was helping people everywhere far beyond his ability to ever help anyone. Within a few weeks he contracted TB and is now dying in a London hospital. Nobody took off the overts and withholds when he left. And it’s actually killing him-a fact which is no fancy on my part. There is something a little terrifying in this sometimes. I once told a bill collector what and who we were and that he had wronged a good person and a half hour later he threw a hundred grains of Veronal down his throat and was lugged off to hospital, a suicide.
Hubbard, L. R. (1959, 31 December). Blow-Offs The Technical Bulletins of Dianetics and Scientology (1991 ed., Vol. V, pp. 260-262). Los Angeles: Bridge Publications, Inc.
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Thu Feb 24, 2011 11:30 pm

According to Patterson's Robert A. Heinlein In Dialog With His Century, Hubbard and Jack Parsons met in April 1945, at Heinlein's suggestion. (pp. 339, 345).

Patterson wrote that Heinlein and Parsons met through their mutual interest in rocketry, apparently following a November 1939 LA Times article about Parsons, Frank Molina and Ed Forman, shortly after Parsons had a paper on powder rocket fuels published in Astronautics. Both men were members of the American Rocket Society (p. 345). It's reported that Heinlein joined while aboard the USS Lexington. (Ref. History of AIAA.) According to Patterson, Heinlein reported to the USS Lexington on 23 June 1929 and received orders to transfer to the USS Roper on 20 June 1932 (pp. 110, 156).

Also, Heinlein attended a performance of the Gnostic Mass at the Parsonage, and saved the program and a paperbound copy of Crowley's Book of the Law "for future reference." (p. 374). (Wikipedia: Liber XV Gnostic Mass.) (Patterson didn't give a date.)
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

peter
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 11:17 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by peter » Sat Feb 26, 2011 9:35 am

ChefXenu wrote:It is interesting that as people investigate Heinlein's documents, evidence is being found which supports the claims of Gerry Armstrong as to the legitimacy of LRH's Affirmations. I haven't been following ARS lately, but it will be entertaining to see how roadrunner dances around the new evidence. ](*,)

Seriously though, I love this thread, and want to thank everyone who is sharing their finds here.
=D>
Soderqvist1: Where can I find this?
A simple explanation with few explanation grounds is to prefer, except when you need to hide your flaws! - Peter Soderqvist

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Sat Feb 26, 2011 5:37 pm

peter wrote:
ChefXenu wrote:It is interesting that as people investigate Heinlein's documents, evidence is being found which supports the claims of Gerry Armstrong as to the legitimacy of LRH's Affirmations. I haven't been following ARS lately, but it will be entertaining to see how roadrunner dances around the new evidence. ](*,)

Seriously though, I love this thread, and want to thank everyone who is sharing their finds here.
=D>
Soderqvist1: Where can I find this?
I'm not sure what you want to find Soderqvist1, but connections or confirmations between the Admissions and what has been found so far in the Heinlein archives include Vida Jameson, Leslyn Heinlein, probably Fern(e), but for sure Philadelphia, Princeton, the writer friend, Jack Parsons, and doubtlessly there are more.
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

peter
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 11:17 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by peter » Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:03 am

Soderqvist1: Caroline, I misunderstood the message!
I thought that Roadrunner was already in a debate regarding Hubbard’s admissions, and I wanted a link to it. Btw we should start a project in order to verify how much did the whole court know about his affirmations, and how much of said affirmations can be verified by other sources, since both roadrunner and RJ at Marty ‘s home site doubt its authenticity, and I believe that many Loyalists do. Roadrunners name is Michel Snoeck, see photography on him here!
http://www.wiseoldgoat.com/introduction_of_site.html

Soderqvist1: and I have talked with him on the internet here in Sweden before about Hubbard’s admissions and got him to swallow at least 2-3 phrases from it as can be seen here in his tabulations about said Admissions!
http://www.wiseoldgoat.com/papers-scien ... wo1-b.html#

Soderqvist1: after I have talked to him, I began to investigate further about it, and to make long story short; the parties in the court and the judge has read said affirmations, and verified its handwritings by Hubbard, both the “Course 2” and “the Book” from the admissions is read into the court record. Click on the link to the curt and read more phrases from his affirmation which at least to me has proven it beyond reasonable doubt that “affirmation 2000 by Gerry Armstrong” is part of the record.
http://www.scnforum.org/index.php?t=msg ... #msg_12272

Soderqvist1: Both “Twelve against the Gods” which was Hubbard’s favorite book!
viewtopic.php?p=368149#p368149

Soderqvist1: or a CoS friendly home site if somebody doubts it was Hubbard’s favorite book!
http://www.erbzine.com/mag23/2344.html

Soderqvist1: and Robert Vaughn Young have pieces of supporting evidence!

Twelve against the Gods by William Bolitho chapter Casanova
Page: 48: A rationale for seduction, indeed is only to be attempted by sniggering old men like Ovid, though if it were based on the wisdom and practice of this maligned Casanova it might have the result of frightening the majority of amateur woman-hunters from the chase. His love for every one of the thousand was as real as any that lead to holy matrimony; only it did not last. So he escaped both alimony and the glue years. But his women were not cheated out of their sacred due, for he gave them everything he possessed, and his whole self, in one single payment.

Page 49: How many times he unmetaphorically beggared himself for the paramour of a week, how many times at the height of his fortune he threw himself without hesitation or regret down into the gutter for a new charmer; and without any thought of bargain, this for that. Let those envy his amours who can imitate him in this; and those who can add to it his real tenderness, that never forgot the name of one of his light of loves, or how beautiful she was, the irresistible riches of the talk of the man, the prestige of his shoulders, his neck and his eyes, dare to emulate him. As for his censors, only those have the right to damn him who are quite certain the promise of life-companionship of a man however poor and tedious outweighs all Casanova gave. The prime direction of Casanova’s adventure, therefore, is the forbidden world of women. In the rise of his trajectory his will is as single as Alexander’s.

Page 51: Casanova had learnt two Latin saws, which were to be for the rest of his life his gospel and his policy: Fata viam inveniunt. Volentem ducit, nolentem trahit. As we may say: Fate finds the way, and Life leads its lover, betrays its rebel. The one handed down from stoics through Epictetus and Seneca; the second a translation by Cicero of a line in the lost tragedy of Euripides. There is no better epitome of the purest tradition of adventure, with all the comfort of fatalism without its enervating effects; no better summary of the mystical doctrine of adventure. Casanova held to them like a Calvinist to his Bible, and repeating them to himself, set out on his next adventure in good spirits.

Admissions or Affirmations by L. Ron Hubbard
LRH: You have no fear if they conceive. What if they do? You do not care. Pour it into them and let fate decide.
The slipperier they are the more you enjoy it because it means their mucous is running madly with pleasure.

LRH: I returned to sea as navigator of a large ship and was subsequently selected for the Military Government School at Princeton whither I went in 1944-45 for three months. During my Princeton sojourn I was very tired and harrassed (sp?) and spent week-ends with a writer friend in Philadelphia. He almost forced me to sleep with his wife. Meanwhile I had a affair with a woman named Ferne. Somehow, perhaps because I had constantly wet feet and no sleep at Princeton, I contracted a staphloceus infection. I mistook it for gonnhorea and until I arrived at Monterey, believed my old illness had returned. I consulted a doctor there who reassured me.
http://www.lermanet.com/exit/hubbard-ad ... -eval.html

THE HUBBARD ARCHIVES by Robert Vaughn Young
Let's start in late 1981, when I happened to acquire the archives that contained Hubbard's private papers. (These were the ones that Gerry Armstrong started.) The truly essential material came down to perhaps 15 linear feet of paper. Over the months, with nothing else to do, I had a chance to read private letters, papers and manuscripts (including the three, yes, three, versions of the infamous Excalibur, which has to be the most overblown piece of hype he EVER produced and, no, it has NOTHING to do with OT3), which also gave me the full uncensored view of this man. I read everything from love letters to (and from and about) his mistresses, his girlfriends (such as Fern, who gave him the clap, forcing him to secretly take sulfa), his private pornographic ramblings (he liked to draw penises and vaginas around the margins in red ink, which gave the page a grisly look), his black magic material, his letters to family, wives (in the early 1950s, while having mistress Barbara on the side and at the same time preaching about the dangers of illicit relationships), editors and even to himself, as journals.

There was one problem with what I read. It didn't match what we (collectively then, meaning the organization) were saying about Hubbard and what Hubbard, based on what he had say to say. When I tried to gently point this out, the Shinola hit the fan. It didn't matter that it was in Hubbard's own hand. It didn't match the story he put out so — straight out of "1984" — it didn't exist. (These documents were later confiscated and sealed away to make sure no staff see them but enough of us did — including a few still on staff (hi, guys!) — so it can be verified someday, if it comes to that. But that is another story.)
http://www.xenu-directory.net/accounts/ ... D_ARCHIVES
A simple explanation with few explanation grounds is to prefer, except when you need to hide your flaws! - Peter Soderqvist

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:32 pm

(Discussion re the Admissions continued on OCMB: LRH's Admissions/Affirmations)

The Heinlein archives reveal that Heinlein and Hubbard shared a relationship with Dr. Francis M. Pottenger, of the Pottenger Sanatorium and Clinic, Monrovia, California. Dr. Pottenger treated Heinlein for tuberculosis between February and May 1933. (Heinlein archives: ANNA201a-09).

Hubbard spoke of his relationship with Old Doc Pottenger in lectures, in connection with diagnosis of disease. Hubbard claimed Pottenger could diagnose tuberculosis 100% of the time just by putting his hand on people's chests. Hubbard calls the E-meter in the same Scientology scripture in which he lauds Pottenger's diagnosis tech, "a “lie detector,” completely in addition to being a diagnostic instrument." The 1971 US v. Hubbard E-Meter decision, of course, debunks this claim and requires that meters carry the following label: "The E-Meter is not medically or scientifically useful for the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease. It is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily functions of anyone." (Wikipedia: E-Meter)

On 13 December 1945, Dr. F.M. Pottenger wrote to Heinlein apologizing for not calling, as he had lost Heinlein's address, and "not because of a lack of interest in your project." (Heinlein archives: CORR220-2)

Heinlein replied to "Father Pottenger" on 20 January 1946, and referred to an earlier discussion between Dr. Pottenger, Heinlein and "Lt. Hubbard" concerning "the project." Heinlein said he had "not intended to work on it directly," but that "Hubbard intended to do organizational and publicity work for it." Heinlein wrote that circumstances had since made it necessary for Hubbard to "give his attention to finding a job and making some money." Heinlein said that "the organization work had progressed" without either Heinlein or Hubbard's help, and had changed names from "The Federation of Atomic Scientists" to the "Federation of American Scientists." Heinlein informed Pottenger that he had been corresponding with Jerry Voorhis, (an M.C. in Washington D.C.) and was "trying to work out with him means of dramatizing atomic problems to increase the chances of rational political action." (Heinlein archives: CORR220-2)

It will be seen that Hubbard attempted to restart this campaign in 1951 with his "Allied Scientists of the World" using the personnel and communication lines of the Dianetics groups that had formed following the publication of DMSMH.
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:33 pm

Heinlein introduced Hubbard and John Arwine, an Annapolis classmate of Heinlein who kept an apartment in New York and apparently made a living writing "true confession" stories. (Patterson, 2010). It was at John Arwine's apartment in the spring of 1940 where Heinlein gave a dinner party for John and Dona Campbell, the de Camps, Hubbard, Vida Jameson, and others. Hubbard wrote about John Arwine in All About Radiation, The Revolt of the American Nuclear Physicists.

On 28 January 1945, Heinlein wrote from Philadelphia to Lieut. John S. Arwine, c/o FS-356, Navy No. 920, FPO, San Francisco, reminding him of the "red-headed boy" at their 1940 dinner party, saying that Hubbard was now headed his way as an MG (Military Government) officer. (Wikipedia says on the "Military Career of L. Ron Hubbard," he failed to pass his School of Military Government examinations.) Heinlein told Arwine that Hubbard was "our kind of people in every possible way...and his evaluations match ours." (Heinlein archives: CORR327-02).

Jack Parsons expressed a similar confidence about Hubbard to Aleister Crowley. "Most Beloved Father, About three months ago I met Capt. L. Ron Hubbard, a writer and explorer of whom I had known for some time...He is the most thelemic person I have ever met and is in complete accord with our own principles. He is also interested in establishing the New Aeon..." Carter, J. (1999). Sex and Rockets The Occult World of Jack Parsons. Venice, California: Feral House.

According to Robert A. Heinlein In Dialog With His Century, Hubbard and Parsons met in April 1945.
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Thu Mar 03, 2011 3:27 am

Heinlein wrote to his long time friend and Annapolis classmate Cal Laning, on 20 (perhaps 21) November 1945, that his and Leslyn's current house guests at 8777 Lookout Mountain Avenue, Hollywood, included Henry Sang, who had been Heinlein's boss in Philadelphia, Sang's "significant other" Grace Dugan and L. Ron Hubbard. (Patterson, 2010; Heinlein archives: CORR220-1)

Heinlein said that John Arwine and Hubbard had "whipped up a plan to organize all the scientists for the purpose of channelizing some of the rational thought for this crisis" and that they had "organized CalTech already."

Heinlein implored Laning, essentially, to reconsider a negative opinion Laning had apparently formed years earlier of Arwine as a midshipman. Heinlein said Arwine had returned to the east coast and would probably soon look Laning up. Heinlein wrote assuringly that Arwine's "evaluations are almost identical" to his, although Arwine didn't occupy Laning's "unencroachably senior position in the circle of our trusted and intimate friends." Amazingly, Heinlein wrote in his supplication to Laning to trust Arwine, that Heinlein expected Arwine "to be much more effective than I could ever be."

Heinlein wrote that his intentions were to stay in California and write articles that "propagandize for what I believe is sanity, to wit, the creation of a world state to insure peace in the atomic age." (Heinlein archives: CORR220-1)
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

User avatar
mickwenlock
Posts: 720
Joined: Fri May 24, 2002 2:32 pm

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by mickwenlock » Tue Apr 05, 2011 8:01 pm

truthseeker wrote:slightly off topic but heinlein's starship troopers,I saw the film but couldn't work out whether it was pro-war or anti-war?
The movie - which I enjoyed (blush) has nothing to do with Heinlein's book except for some of the names of the characters.

Heinleins book is a commentary and observation on political systems. He advocated that anyone should be able to vote who had earned it. And only those who had earned it could vote. It followed the development of its main character Juan Rico. The book is awesome.

His "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" was an even better political discussion.

User avatar
elwood
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by elwood » Wed Apr 06, 2011 5:14 pm

mickwenlock wrote:
truthseeker wrote:slightly off topic but heinlein's starship troopers,I saw the film but couldn't work out whether it was pro-war or anti-war?
The movie - which I enjoyed (blush) has nothing to do with Heinlein's book except for some of the names of the characters.

Heinleins book is a commentary and observation on political systems. He advocated that anyone should be able to vote who had earned it. And only those who had earned it could vote. It followed the development of its main character Juan Rico. The book is awesome.

His "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" was an even better political discussion.
In Starship Troopers Heinlein's basic premise is that only those who have shown they are willing to take the responsibility for defending a society should be allowed to vote. In that case military service was the criteria because at some point in the past the veterans had stepped forward and salvaged society.

I kind of liked Nevil Shute's formula for voting from In The Wet:

1. Everyone gets one basic vote.
2. University graduates get an additional vote.
3. Military service gets an additional vote.
4. A fourth vote can be bestowed by the Queen for extraordinary service to the Crown.

I think there's a fifth vote, but it's been a while since I read the book and I can't remember what it was. It may have been property ownership; the premise being that if you own property you pay taxes.
When trouble arises and things look bad, there is always one individual who perceives a solution and is willing to take command. Very often, that individual is crazy.
-- Dave Barry

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Fri May 06, 2011 4:50 pm

In his Acknowledgements, Leon Stover, the author of Robert Heinlein (1987), says that the Heinleins supplied the book's appendix. I found this document interesting and worth posting here because of the occult references and the mention of "L. Ron."
Leon Stover wrote:
Image

Image

Image
Interesting too is Heinlein's clever use of 93 (93). 93 is a significant number in Thelema, meaning among other things a shorthand salutation between Thelemites. (Ref. Encyclopedia Thelemica.)
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

peter
Posts: 846
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2001 11:17 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by peter » Thu Jul 28, 2011 2:24 pm

Is it possible Caroline that Robert Heinlein has ”whispered” in Hubbard’s ear something about Korzybski’ s structural differential in example; “you shall not confuse the first order of abstraction that you see a ear, with the next order of abstraction namely inference that it is likely that he has two ears, and Hubbard Jumped up from his chair and came up with the idea of Obnosis?
http://www.scientologyhandbook.org/SH4_3.HTM
A simple explanation with few explanation grounds is to prefer, except when you need to hide your flaws! - Peter Soderqvist

User avatar
caroline
Posts: 2315
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 3:29 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Hubbard and Heinlein

Post by caroline » Thu Jul 28, 2011 6:59 pm

peter wrote:Is it possible Caroline that Robert Heinlein has ”whispered” in Hubbard’s ear something about Korzybski’ s structural differential in example; “you shall not confuse the first order of abstraction that you see a ear, with the next order of abstraction namely inference that it is likely that he has two ears, and Hubbard Jumped up from his chair and came up with the idea of Obnosis?
http://www.scientologyhandbook.org/SH4_3.HTM
That's an interesting observation, Peter. 8) It also seems evident from the following lecture that Hubbard's "obnosis" relates to orders of abstraction. (That word always made me cringe a little, it is so fatuous.) Notice also Hubbard's process that gets the person repetitively labeling the auditor.
Hubbard wrote:This is January 9th, 1957, the sixth lecture of the 16th ACC.

I want to talk to you today about the obvious. Going to talk to you specifically about obnosis. Obnosis is a coined, facetious term. The whole thing is the heart, soul and basis of what we're doing in this course.

We have communication. The obvious thing is that you are there, and there is something there to be controlled. That's obvious, isn't it? So "obnosis" would apply there as observing the obvious: -nosis means "know," and ob- means "out"; observe the obvious.

Communication requires that you observe the obvious fact that there is something there to be communicated with. Awfully obvious, isn't it? Happens to be the heart and soul of communication.

If you don't know there's something there to be communicated with, you miscommunicate. All miscommunication is based on the
fact that the person who is doing the communication does not know there is something there to be communicated with! In other words,
he doesn't observe the obvious.

This fantastic process, "Look at me. Who am I?" is, of course, getting the preclear to observe the obvious. And on what fantastic vias they miscall who is talking to them!

"Look at me. Who am I?"

"Oh, I know who you are! I know who you are. You're... you're a classmate. Huh-huh."

"Pretty good. All right. Look at me. Who am I?" See? Here we go.

You've asked him to observe the obvious. Why can't he? Because he's a case of "complinosis": Observe the complicated at all times. Don't ever observe the obvious.

Cases, you will discover, the worse they are off, the more complicated they are.

Hubbard, L. (1957, 9 January). Obnosis. Sixteenth American Advanced Clinical Course. Lecture conducted from Washington, D.C.
Who really needs to realize that they're sitting in front of the auditor they're paying to audit them?

Heinlein's "fair witness" in Stranger in a Strange Land dealt with the training of observations of events, so it's very likely that he and Hubbard tossed around these ideas.
Wikipedia wrote:Fair Witness is a fictional profession invented for the novel. A Fair Witness is an individual trained to observe events and report exactly what he or she sees and hears, making no extrapolations or assumptions. An eidetic memory is a prerequisite for the job, although this may be attainable with suitable training.

In Heinlein's society, a Fair Witness is a highly reputable source of information. By custom, a Fair Witness acting professionally, generally wearing distinctive white robes, is never addressed directly, and all present are supposed to avoid acknowledging the presence of the Witness in any way.

The character Jubal Harshaw employs a Fair Witness, Anne, as one of his secretaries. Unlike the other secretaries, she does not use dictation equipment when Jubal speaks. She can even keep track of several works at once, despite Harshaw's frequent switching among them.

Fair Witnesses are prohibited from drawing conclusions about what they observe. As a demonstration, Harshaw asks Anne to describe the color of a house in the distance. She responds, "It's white on this side". Harshaw explains that she would not assume knowledge of the color of the other sides of the house without being able to see them. Furthermore, after observing another side of the house would not then assume that any previously seen side was still the same color as last reported, even if only minutes before.

When Ben Caxton decides to do something that might result in litigation—namely accusing a government official of substituting an actor for Valentine Michael Smith in a televised interview—he hires a highly respected Witness, James Oliver Cavendish, to record everything he sees, and to ensure that Ben is not accused of slander. They visit the alleged Man From Mars in his hospital suite in the hope of determining whether he is actually Smith or the actor who had apparently impersonated him the night before. Once Ben and the fair witness have left, and the Mr. Cavendish's Fair Witness persona goes off duty, Mr. Cavendish shows a fundamental problem with a human Fair Witness by mentioning that Ben should have looked for telltale calluses on the supposed Smith's feet; He then realized his mistake when Ben immediately wants to go back, therefore he states that he can no longer serve as a Fair Witness for this case and Ben would need to procure another Fair Witness. Frustrated by the professional ethics of the Fair Witness profession, Ben must make other plans to prove the identity of Mr. Smith.

Retrieved on 28 July 2011 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stranger_in_a_Strange_Land
INTELLIGENCE SPECIALIST TRAINING ROUTINE – TR L
Purpose: To train the student to give a false statement with good TR-1. To train the student to outflow false data effectively.
Commands: Part l “Tell me a lie”.

Post Reply

Return to “Opinions & Debate”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests