One opened, more to come!
It is currently Mon May 20, 2013 4:52 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 304 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 21  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:20 am
Posts: 8092
IANAL, but Debbie could send a lawyer-approved certified letter to Miscavige and his lawyers* announcing "I never got a copy of the agreement and if I don't get a copy in X days I will consider it void and start talking." If no response in X days, it is obvious CoS fears the agreement is legally weak and possibly embarassing. She could start talking about having no copy of the agreement, send more letters, and start revealing stuff. Florida statute of limitations for fraud is four years, so she should wait until four years after her exit, to protect herself from fraud lawsuits.**

I bet when outsiders settled with CoS, both sides got a copy of the agreement. For example, Lisa McPherson's family must have a copy because they had their own lawyers. It's often Sea Org workers that get the shaft in these gag agreements, signing an agreement and walking away without their copy.

Another angle is that, if verbally Debbie was threatened with disconnection from family still in Scientology, she signed under duress which also voids the agreement.

* I remember posts about people failing to get certified letters to a Sea Org person, so the letter should go to Miscavige with a cc to CoS's main lawyer-whores Kendrick Moxon, Monica Yingling, and Stephen and Sherman Lenske.
** http://www.statuteoflimitations.net/flo ... ations.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 2:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 2:44 am
Posts: 99
Smurf wrote:
Mark Cabian wrote:
We can all agree that it doesn't exist, so why say she has a ND agreement? I was born with an ass; you analogy is poor.
Nope, I don't agree, so your analogy that we ALL believe as you do is poor. It is standard procedure for Scilons routing out of the cult to be confronted with gag agreements & threats by OSA; why's it hard to believe this didn't occur with Debbie when she blew from Flag, was recovered, and routed out to become a public?

An attorney informed me she not only signed a gag agreement, she was paid off as well.


Dox? I don't agree, so your analogy that we ALL believe as you do is poor. I know tons of people who routed out without a gag agreement. Did you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
Mark Cabian wrote:
I know tons of people who routed out without a gag agreement. Did you?
Dox on the "tons of people", please. As to your question, I didn't route out; I blew.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 5046
Location: Bondi Beach
Is this thread going to turn into another slap-fest?

Coz >I< for one have had enough of the stinking up of decent threads

_________________
"If anyone talks about a "road to Freedom" he is talking about a linear line. This, then, must have boundaries. If there are boundaries there is no freedom." - Dianetics 55


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:54 am
Posts: 276
Location: Page 213
Do I understand correctly that Mr. Rathbun is collecting money for a "Debbie Cook Defense Fund" without her authorization or participation? Has she, in fact, been sued? Does this litigation ever end? Seems like the 'indies' are acting just like the 'insies'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
bubbler wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Mr. Rathbun is collecting money for a "Debbie Cook Defense Fund" without her authorization or participation? Has she, in fact, been sued? Does this litigation ever end? Seems like the 'indies' are acting just like the 'insies'.
Marty claimed through his "sources" she was being sued, so to look like the white knight, he took it upon himself to start a defense fund for her, despite an earlier thread requesting Independents to ignore her.

No evidence has been presented to show Debbie asked for nor authorized the fund in her name. Marty just decided to do it, and his fan club are coughing up donations. Several people, including myself, have called & left messages for Debbie & Wayne & pm'd her on Facebook to inquire whether she asked for or approved of the defense fund.. but they have not responded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 7:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 12:23 am
Posts: 14692
Location: U.K.
Smurf wrote:
bubbler wrote:
Do I understand correctly that Mr. Rathbun is collecting money for a "Debbie Cook Defense Fund" without her authorization or participation? Has she, in fact, been sued? Does this litigation ever end? Seems like the 'indies' are acting just like the 'insies'.
Marty claimed through his "sources" she was being sued, so to look like the white knight, he took it upon himself to start a defense fund for her, despite an earlier thread requesting Independents to ignore her.

No evidence has been presented to show Debbie asked for nor authorized the fund in her name. Marty just decided to do it, and his fan club are coughing up donations. Several people, including myself, have called & left messages for Debbie & Wayne & pm'd her on Facebook to inquire whether she asked for or approved of the defense fund.. but they have not responded.


I've not seen any evidence either, that she's being sued, threatened to be sued or that she's even asked for anyone's help let alone Marty Rathbun.

Xinjifar, posting on WWP, wrote:
For those asking themselves what the hell is going on; thanks to Ladybird for spotting this illuminating exchange:
------------------------------------
Mickey | January 23, 2012 at 7:29 pm |

Marty, just a housekeeping note on donations. If for some reason Debbie and her team do not wish to utilize the funds you are collecting, the funds will be quickly returned to the donors, unless the donors say otherwise. Yes?
...

----------------------------------------------------------------
martyrathbun09 | January 23, 2012 at 8:40 pm |


Not quite. We are putting the defense (offense) together now, and paying for it. This message alone in today’s post was worth 50K in defense impact. Anything unused can be returned. But, the chances of that are slim.


--------------------------------------------------------------



Exactly.

ref: https://whyweprotest.net/community/thre ... st-2029449

So he's asking for donations to a "defense/offense" fund that wasn't asked for by the person who hasn't even verified whether she's being sued or needs anyone else to help even if she was. Furthermore, if she doesn't want the donations then Marty is saying he won't return them because he's already decided that they likely all be used up.
Hmm sounds totally transparent and legit. :roll:



edit: typo

_________________
WWW.XENU-DIRECTORY.NET Awesome document/media resources
Other Activism: Divided By Zero forum, Why We Protest forum
Image


Last edited by Sponge on Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 8:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:23 pm
Posts: 177
What is a Hubbardarian sect without a war chest? Inevitable, no?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
Sponge wrote:
So he's asking for donations to a "defense/offense" fund that wasn't asked for by the person who hasn't even verified whether she's being sued or needs anyone else to help even if she was. Furthermore, if she doesn't want the donations then Marty is saying he won't return them because he's already decided that they likely all be used up.Hmm sounds totally transparent and legit.
Actually, it's illegal. And because he's accepting donations from out-of-state (the fund is based out of Marty's home in Texas), Marty could be charged with violating federal law.

It all boils down to whether Debbie authorized the fund in her name. If she didn't, she, or the people that contributed to the campaign, would need to file charges with the FBI. The complainant cannot remain anonymous.

http://www.ic3.gov/default.aspx

The problem with Marty is that he's still operating from his Inspector General mindset when he was still in the cult. He feels he's invincible and untouchable by the authorities. And his adoring fan club of Independents only makes matters worse. One of these days, Marty's going to get knock at the door, and be brought back to reality, when some cold, stainless steel handcuffs are slapped on him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 3:54 am
Posts: 276
Location: Page 213
"We are putting the defense (offense) together now..."
- MR
"Always attack, never defend..."
- LRH
"Can the leopard change his spots?"
- Jeremiah 13: 23

:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:03 pm
Posts: 1895
Location: Kansas
Smurf wrote:
Actually, it's illegal.

Are you sure about that?

If that's true, then this website:

http://www.fundraisingip.com/fundraisin ... donations/

is helping to create lots of extra criminals.

And this one:

http://nonprofit.about.com/od/qathebasi ... donate.htm

Is not warning people that it is illegal and is giving them bad advice.

Marty knows he can be in big trouble (lawsuits etc.) with this if he doesn't account for the funds or uses them for some other purpose without the approval of the donors. At the very least he risks pissing off his followers.

Personally I think a legal defense fund for the victims of the Cult's legal attacks is a good idea. I'm glad Marty is helping Debbie. She should be helped imo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 5:17 pm
Posts: 4970
Smurf, how is it illegal? People give all kinds of donations to all kinds of things online.

_________________
"A man may build himself a throne of bayonets, but he cannot sit on it." -William Ralph Inge

Watch the Los Angeles press conference here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/ScilonTV#p/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 6:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
I'mglib wrote:
Smurf, how is it illegal? People give all kinds of donations to all kinds of things online.
Re-read the post I was responding to, especially this "Furthermore....if she doesn't want the donations then Marty is saying he won't return them because he's already decided that they likely all be used up......"

If Marty is raising money for a defense fund for someone that has not requested nor authorized it, then says that donations will not be returned even if they're not applied to the defense fund, there is the implication of fraud and misrepresentation... that is illegal.

If Marty is smart, he will keep a record of donations made to the fund, and return every cent to contributors, if Debbie refuses them. It only take 1-2 anonymous donations from someone in the cult to start a legal case against him (if he chooses not to return donations).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:35 am
Posts: 67
Wieber wrote:
Is this just going away without any follow up or resolution?

Did $cientology's office of special affairs (OSA) succeed in making the story go away?

They seem to be rather slow to react lately. It took them what, five months to print a Fredom on Paul Haggis?

_________________
'Through judicious use of the E-Meter Scientology auditors were able to remove countless Thetans ("dollars") from followers.'
- Jon Stewart


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Debbie Cook Speaks 12/31/2011
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 10:57 pm
Posts: 8397
mussel wrote:
Wieber wrote:
Is this just going away without any follow up or resolution?

Did $cientology's office of special affairs (OSA) succeed in making the story go away?

They seem to be rather slow to react lately. It took them what, five months to print a Fredom on Paul Haggis?


I guess they were busy making the "Dead Agent Marty" video per this OCMB thread:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=51914&view=unread#unread

_________________
"That which can be destroyed by the truth should be." — Patricia Christine Hodgell

Image
http://www.worldcat.org./profiles/Wieber/lists/563909


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 304 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 21  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Jefe' and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group