David J. Schindler is an attorney for Latham & Watkins LLP, the L.A. based international powerhouse law firm:
David J. Schindler is a devout Jew and yet he is, ironically, defending the Scientology Master Race Cult, a group whose scriptures call for a Genocide against Scientology's enemies.
Schindler, David J. Partner Los Angeles
Health Care and Life Sciences
Intellectual Property, Media and Technology
Securities Litigation and Professional Liability
White Collar and Government Investigations
In this thread, I will use Scientology's own scriptures to show Mr. Schindler and Latham & Watkins LLP partners, associates, and the media why Scientology is a Master Race group that embodies a call for Genocide in its scriptures.
At the outset, I will refresh Mr. Schindler's memory by reminding him that eleven top Scientology's leaders signed a Stipulation of Evidence in which they plead to being White Collar Criminals in the Cult's infamous "Operation Snow White."
The Stipulation of Evidence listed numerous felonies in what was the largest ever case of Domestic Espionage. Over 500 FBI Agents raided Scientology offices in D.C. and L.A. in 1978 and seized 100,000's of files, many of which Scientology operatives had stolen from the US Gov't in a program of systematic burglaries and wiretapping against the IRS and other agencies. Mary Sue Hubbard, the wife of L. Ron Hubbard, signed the Stipulation and went to prison while L. Ron Hubbard remained in hiding as an unindicted co-conspirator in Operation Snow White.
There is anecdotal evidence that suggests CoS has, on a few occasions, crossed over into being a Red Collar Criminal group -- as in the Cult's internal and external enemies suddenly turning up inexplicably dead. Scientology's top critic in Clearwater, Florida was named Shawn Lonsdale. Shawn was found dead of "suicide" in his home under strange circumstances recently. L. Ron Hubbard's Fair Game policy allows Scientologists to attack Scientology critics:
ENEMY SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
Copyright c 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
Mr. Schindler, don't turn away from this. You are an Attorney of Record for Scientology. You are also a member of The House of Justice. I will show you why you have a major ethical and religious conflict in your life and law practice at present. Please hear me out on this and then decide for yourself.
1. In June of 1965, L. Ron Hubbard took the bizarre step of declaring Scientologists to be a new and distinct race that was separate from, and superior to Homo Sapien, the race into which he himself was born and belonged. This spurious and hateful distinction allowed Hubbard to inject the diabolical element of racial superiority into the minds of Scientologists:
"HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis, new. (BCR, p. 12) 2. a theta-animated mest body possessed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skyscraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40) 3. the Second Stage Release is definitely Homo novis. The person ceases to respond like Homo sapiens and has fantastic capability to learn and act. (HCOB 28 Jun 65)"
-- L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary
[Re: "Homo Scientologicus"] : "Man had to cease to be Homo Sapiens and had to become Homo Scientologicus in order to accomplish any action that was anywhere near efficient in South Africa."
-- L. Ron Hubbard, PAB 119 1 September 1957 The Big Auditing Problem
 Any non-Scientologist is a "wog," someone who "isn't even trying."
-- L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary
ref for above cites:http://www.suppressiveperson.org/
Having declared non-Scientologists to be racially inferior to Scientologists allowed Hubbard to dehumanize them in the minds of his followers. Having dehumanized non-Scientologists as a racially inferior, it was an easy next step for Hubbard to declare that Scientologists could harm any members of this inferior race should they dare attack Scientology and the superior race of Homo Scientologicus. Hubbard stated in writing that the members of the inferior race were to be treated like game animals during hunting season, for Hubbard declared them to be Fair Game:
ENEMY SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by
any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
Copyright c 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
The governments of England, America, Greece, and other countries saw the dangers of Scientology in the 1960's and conducted investigations. The media covered these investigations and this all brought negative attention to Scientology. That members of an inferior race would dare attack the master race of Homo Scientologicus and its Supreme Leader infuriated L. Ron Hubbard. Accordingly, on 16 Feb 1969, L. Ron Hubbard, realizing that he could not defeat the world in one decisive battle and bring it under a Scientology dictatorship, declared a war of attrition against the world.
Let us consider Hubbard's "BATTLE PLAN" against the world thirty-six years after he issued this declaration of war. First, the BATTLE PLAN itself. I will present it in sections with commentary. The bolded sections are my emphases:
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 FEBRUARY 1969
REISSUED 24 SEPTEMBER 1987
(Reissued with updated distribution.)
(This is a defense paper on material developed after 18
years of ceaseless attack by a foreign enemy. Nothing in
this paper advocates physical violence or invites the physical
destruction of persons.)...
We see that Hubbard opened his Battle Plan by stating that, "nothing in this paper advocates physical violence or invites the physical destruction of persons." However, the Fair Game doctrine was an LRH policy and has continued to a Scientology doctrine. While not advocating violence or murder, Hubbard does not explicitly condemn or forbid physical violence or murder. It is out of character for Hubbard to be vague. In his other policy letters he was always very explicit about details as when he defined what constituted crimes against Scientology and their punishments. In another example, Hubbard wrote a detailed policy on how to prepare his barley formula for babies that he claimed was based on an ancient Roman formula.
In his Battle Plan, Hubbard left the door open to physical violence and murder for that which he does not advocate he also does not forbid. In point of fact, Hubbard's 1967 Policy of Fair Game was still in effect when he issued this Battle Plan and Fair Game allowed the enemy, i.e. the inferior race of Homo Sapien, to be injured. Hubbard never revoked the policy of Fair Game but he did order that the policy never be publicly discussed due to the negative PR it drew. Hubbard's successor, David Miscavige has never gone on record as publicly canceling and repudiating the Policy of Fair Game or Hubbard's 1969 Battle Plan.
Hubbard continues with his Battle Plan:
In these days of "cold war" when actual warfare is
impossible due to atomic weapons, the warfare is waged in the
press and public in the form of ideas.
If you uniformly apply the tactics and strategy of battle
to the rows we get into, press or legal or public confrontation,
you will win.
The enemy uses " groups" and meetings of groups like one
would use squads.
If we and they are considered as two hostile and opposing
nations at war, then a huge array of tactics and strategy
In the above bolded section we see that Hubbard considers Scientology to be a sovereign nation, a law unto itself, that is at war against a nation of inferior peoples, i.e. Homo Sapien. It is clear that Hubbard understood Scientology to be in a state of war against the world.
One parallels in the field of thought what is used and
done in the field of battle in other ages.
You don't have to know too much about the tactics and
strategy of warfare to apply this but it helps.
The end product of war, according to Clausewitz, the
authority on it, is (condensed) "to bring about a more amenable
frame of mind on the part of the enemy."
But there are also wars of attrition. We are engaged
in one where total destruction of us has been the enemy's aim
for, at this writing, 19 years. This is barbarian warfare,
thus the enemy must have had very positive fears and terrors
about us. Since he fought for total attrition. In this case
it is not safe to hope for any half-way win. We must ourselves
fight on the basis of total attrition of the enemy. So
never get reasonable about him. Just go all the way in and
It is bad warfare to fight battles on your own terrain,
in your own subject area. It is not good to fight in the
territory of allies. Fight battles wherever possible only on
enemy terrain, in and about his subject and his people, not
ours. You can gauge your relative success by this. When
all your battles are fought on his terrain, you are winning.
A good general expends the maximum of enemy troops and
the minimum of his own. He makes the war costly to the
enemy, not to himself.
In the section above, Hubbard calls for a war of attrition in which Scientology will, over time, wear down the forces of the inferior race of Homo Sapien. Hubbard also calls a minimum expenditure of Scientology's resources to do so. If we consider Scientology's conduct of war since 1967 when Hubbard announced Fair Game, we can see that Scientology has relied upon the Economy of Terrorism. In the tactics of terrorism, only one individual need be singled out for a psychologically devastating public attack in order to silence the masses. This is economical and does not require an army.
Hubbard's policy, and one followed by his successor David Miscavige, is to Fair Game individual critics by using intimidation, harassment, and financially ruinous lawsuits. In the calculus of its terrorism, Scientology wants the victim to scream loudly in agony while others look on and shudder and decide not to attack Scientology. Given that Scientology had hundreds of millions of dollars, it could afford to quietly pay off the people it had ruined. The victims would get enough money from Scientology in a legal settlement to start a new life and would, in return, agree to never speak of the settlement or of Scientology in public or private. Once the critic silently disappeared from the public scene, the perception that remained was that Scientology could destroy people with impunity.
Scientology Fair Games former members who seek to tell the truth about Scientology as well as journalists who seek to report on the abuses and excesses of Scientology. The cult does this because it wants to publicize itself as an organization that can take vengeance upon any member of the inferior race who dares to criticize it publicly.
However, all of this has changed due to the enormous cultural repudiation and ridicule of Scientology that erupted in 2005. There is strength in numbers and the global citizenry decided in 2005 to act in unity and attack Scientology for its race war, its polices of Fair Game, and its excessive litigation. Scientology cannot sue the entire world and it cannot destroy the internet where we can tell the truth about Scientology.
In all cases of Fair Game, Scientology's vengeance against valid and documented criticisms was immediate, brutal, and completely out of proportion to the criticisms made. It was meant to be this way for Scientology wanted to get the message across to the inferior race -- and especially its journalists -- that even the slightest criticism would result in a massive and overwhelming retaliation that was focused on character assassination and financial ruination. Hubbard took no half measures in his scorched earth policy against the inferior race. The enormous cultural repudiation and ridicule of Scientology that erupted in 2005 is, in part, payback for the decades of intimidation.
We next see page two of Hubbard's Battle Plan against the inferior race of non-Scientologists:
Copyright (c) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard.
All Rights Reserved.
HCO PL 16.2.69 II
Reiss. 24.9.87 -2-
One cuts off enemy communications, funds, connections.
He deprives the enemy of political advantages, connections
and power. He takes over enemy territory. He raids and
harasses. All on a thought plane - press, public opinion,
Seeing it as a battle, one can apply battle tactics to
Intelligence identifies targets and finds out enemy
plans and purposes, enemy connections, dispositions, etc.
It is fatal to attack a wrong enemy. But it is good tactics
to make the enemy attack wrong targets or persons himself.
Good intelligence pinpoints who when where what.
Good PRO plans an action and operations fights the battle.
Legal is a slow if often final battle arena. It eventually
comes down to legal in the end. If intelligence and PRO have
done well, then legal gets an easy win.
You can win a battle even without legal and by PRO alone.
You intend to win it without legal wherever possible.
The prize is "public opinion" where press is concerned.
The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and
are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy. This means standard
wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity,
war crimes trials, the lot. Know the mores of your public
opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love.
You preserve the image or increase it of your own troops
and degrade the image of the enemy to beast level.
Always be ready to parley but watch for tricks. Don't
give the enemy breathing space.
Capture and use his comm lines. A press magnate on your
side is a big win.
You have in one of these publicity wars all the factors
of modern wars complete with artillery, cavalry, infantry.
For example at this writing, all fighting has been on our
terrain; they knew our generals we didn't know theirs; they
had all the press, funds, government control. We are reversing
this. We are fighting now on their ground. But we have a
long way to go.
We will make it all the way providing we look on this in
terms of active battle and not as a "if we are saintly good we
will win." The people who win wars have a saintly image but
they win the war by clever and forceful use of the rules of
tactics, strategy and battle.
Wars are composed of many battles.
Never treat a war like a skirmish. Treat all skirmishes
In page two, we see Hubbard's utterly psychotic state of mind emerge when he says, "The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy. This means standard wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity, war crimes trials, the lot. Know the mores of your public opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love. That's you."
Hubbard wanted to act sadistically towards the inferior race and yet he wanted this inferior race to love Scientology, and who was the embodiment of Scientology except L. Ron Hubbard? Hubbard was a paranoid schizophrenic: He wanted to be Ron the Terrible who savagely destroyed his enemies, and, he also wanted to be loved and admired as Ron the Savior of Humanity.
Factually, L. Ron Hubbard was mentally ill and violent. That he had a personal fortune estimated to be as high as $400 million dollars in 1969, allowed him to surround himself with lawyers and to use surrogates to do his dirty work. As we saw in Operation Snow White, eleven of the top leaders of Scientology went to prison. Everyone that is except for the mastermind, L. Ron Hubbard. All of the other leaders of Scientology paid for having taken part in the largest act of domestic espionage in US history. However, Hubbard, while he would write the Battle Plan, lead the war, amass the great fortune, and take revenge on his enemies, would not take responsibility for his crimes in Snow White. Instead, he threw his expendable subordinates into the fire and had them pay for his crimes and sins. This included his wife Mary Sue Hubbard who took the fall for her husband. I'm sorry, but I have to get personal here: What kind of man allows his wife to go to prison for his own crimes? I'll tell you what kind of man does this: A complete coward. A real man takes his punishment and doesn't throw his wife to the Feds. As an aside, Anthony Pellicano, despite everything he did that was wrong, sucked it all up and did the right thing: He went to prison and refused to cooperate. Pellicano is a man and Hubbard wasn't.
Hubbard finished his Battle Plan on Page Three with a massively incorrect view of the Cold War:
HCO PL 16.2.69 II
The cold war is a war. The West is losing it because it
is fighting by other rules than the rules of war. We mustn't
L. RON HUBBARD
Adopted as official
Church policy by
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
The Battle Plan can be found at: ref:http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/pl-1969-02-16-battle-tactics-reiss-87.html