The Buttersquash Conspiracy

pitbull · **Joined:** Thu Dec 11, 2003 4:51 am **Posts:** 4430

The so called "real" story of Bob Minton, is not much different
than the stories you hear about the church.

Lies, deceptions, payoffs, greed, selfishness, hidden agendas, betrayal.

But this is common in Scientology. It attracts many people
who are ALREADY attracted by power, and greed. Some are in
the church, some leave the church, and some (like bob) were
never members but just enjoyed the game. A game where individuals
lives are treated like PAWNS.

RIPODB · **Joined:** Sat Apr 08, 2006 8:04 pm **Posts:** 1484

One more thing Patty:

Before you reply with "Zinj did this, Gerry Did that, Tom did this, Bob did that, Stacy did this, etc..." let me ask you a question. Have "they" ever heard of taking the high road? If "they" are the best and brightest critics out there, why would "they" do such childish BS? Wouldn't "their" website be all about undressing $cientology and not about Bush bashing and perpetuating old feuds with people who are on the same side?

tom_ · **Posted:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:09 pm

It is good to read Patty that you're proud to stand up against the cult and it's bullshit. That's terrific progress in the fight against $cn's coercive tactics.

But to honestly believe that the future wellfare of other cult escapees lies in the tainted purity, smarmy sanctity, and faux wisdom of a small group of Buttersquash blogers, remains a tragic thought. Actually as silly ass and obtuse as the Religious Freedom Watch blog.

Wishing a great weekend to all.

.

Ltricha1 · **Posted:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 9:21 pm

RIPODB wrote:

One more thing Patty:

Before you reply with "Zinj did this, Gerry Did that, Tom did this, Bob did that, Stacy did this, etc..." let me ask you a question. Have "they" ever heard of taking the high road? If "they" are the best and brightest critics out there, why would "they" do such childish BS? Wouldn't "their" website be all about undressing $cientology and not about Bush bashing and perpetuating old feuds with people who are on the same side?

Bingo!

My main complaint with the B.S.ers is how they want to come off as noble and good yet their actions are slimy.

umike · **Joined:** Fri Sep 06, 2002 5:13 pm **Posts:** 4088

RIPODB wrote:

umike wrote:

tom_ wrote:

On the Buttersquash Ranch home page, one can scroll down near the bottom and find a topic titled "Tom Padgett, deadbeat dad, liar, felon." Why they choose to do OSA's RFW style ops on people, remains beyond suspicious.

Tom
----------------

www.buttersquash.net/
Nothing suspicious about it at all. Many people were concerned that his story was based on unproved allegations about cult harassment.
Every conclusion reached about Tom Padgett and his case are based on copies of Legal court documents,letters written by him,recorded statements by him,interviews and sworn statements of people that know him and affadavits.

Let the reader be the judge about the credibility regarding his tales of cult harassment.

Link here: www.buttersquash.net/

Thanks so much for the Buttersquash link Mike. After spending some time checking out the site, I realized $cientology and Buttersquash have something in common: They're both worse than you think!.......2)

[..]......Tom Padgett DA thread: Why do "they" have to bring up personal stuff about him? Why can't they just argue on the issues and not become the next RFW?

Because he taunted them for almost 3 years RIPOD. He dared them to prove
(what we all knew) with unending insults and flames.
Consequently Keith Spurgeon flew to the Kentucky courthouse and
copied the documents in question.
I hope that helps...

tom_ · **Posted:** Fri Aug 18, 2006 11:43 pm

Oh such bull crap U-Mike, Keith Spurgeon did not fly to Kentucky to get squat. Diane Richardson and Tigger reported that your deep throat was Bill Whitledge, a paid and reatained lawyer for a $cieno the cult apologists Vannoys. He just sent on a bunch of paper with no purpose other than to DA me RFW style. Just a new slant on dumpster diving tactics.

You have yet to share your deep convictions here on OCMB as to why Bernie and your MC (moderate critic) views reigns the best approach to undressing $cn. Why?
Is it shame? Fear? Lack of backbone?

Patty's attempt to put the Buttersquashers on some plateau
of nobility has failed. So in your mind the only way to save this thread is to ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK.
You're too obvious in your smarm. Back to the drawing board and clay demos for you pal.

You bring new meaning to KSW (keep scientology working) ....KBSW (keep butter squash working.) <laughter>

Tom
----------------
www.fairgamed.org

umike · **Joined:** Fri Sep 06, 2002 5:13 pm **Posts:** 4088

tom_ wrote:

Oh such bull crap U-Mike, Keith Spurgeon did not fly to Kentucky to get squat. Diane Richardson and Tigger reported that your deep throat was Bill Whitledge, a paid and reatained lawyer for a $cieno the cult apologists Vannoys. He just sent on a bunch of paper with no purpose other than to DA me RFW style. Just a new slant on dumpster diving tactics.

You bring new meaning to KSW (keep scientology working) ....KBSW (keep butter squash working.) <laughter>

You keep laughing Tom.
Rut Ro! You called Keith a liar again?
Here's the receipt from the Commonwealth of Kentucky in the amount of 48 dollars and change and it is Timestamped:
http://www.bway.net/~referen/tp/receipt.gif

M.

lermanet_com · **Posted:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:53 am

A gentle reminder to entrants into this thread after scientology scrolled it off the page with double spaced postings hoping you might not notice it
Bob Minton's image is linked to the post earlier in this thread

The real story about Bob Minton and the Lisa Case
[url=http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=20142&postorder=asc&start=135]

LINK[/url]
as told by his best friend

admin · **Posted:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:05 am

I've let this run hoping it would die a natural death. It's time to go back to what this message board is actually for. It is here to help Scientologists who struggle with doubt and want out, and to assist their families and friends. It is here for the non-scientologist who want to understand and the ex-Scientologist who want to share their experience and the harm CoS did to them. For some it is therapy to learn they are not alone. It is meant to be a friendly place, where we come to be safe - not defensive. There are plenty of other places on the Internet where you can be and do other things.

OCMB is not here to debate other critics or their motives.

If you want to debate or have questions about what OCMB is to be used for then go to Feedback & Help.

Patty Pieniadz · **Joined:** Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:50 am **Posts:** 452

RIPODB wrote:

One more thing Patty:

Before you reply with "Zinj did this, Gerry Did that, Tom did this, Bob did that, Stacy did this, etc..." let me ask you a question. Have "they" ever heard of taking the high road? If "they" are the best and brightest critics out there, why would "they" do such childish BS? Wouldn't "their" website be all about undressing $cientology and not about Bush bashing and perpetuating old feuds with people who are on the same side?

Let me understand this. You think talking the "high road" is more important than the facts. You are not interested in the actual truth?

You'd rather allow critics to just blurt out anything as long as it was critical of Scn and facts be damn?

And btw, it's OK for people to have outside interests and political views.

The critic movement is not supposed to be a narrow minded focused cult. Critics are allowed to have websites where they can give their own views of things others than Scn.

Your post basically proves my point. There are a few guys like you that would make excuses for critics just like Scn makes excuses for Hubbard.

It's not OK when they do it and it's not OK when critics do it. Truth is more important than the "high ground".

Patty P

Patty Pieniadz · **Joined:** Sat Apr 01, 2006 12:50 am **Posts:** 452

sorry andreas, I replied to RIPODB before I saw you closed the thread.

Patty P

Ball of Fluff · **Posted:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:17 pm

RIPODB wrote:

One more thing Patty:

Before you reply with "Zinj did this, Gerry Did that, Tom did this, Bob did that, Stacy did this, etc..." let me ask you a question. Have "they" ever heard of taking the high road? If "they" are the best and brightest critics out there, why would "they" do such childish BS? Wouldn't "their" website be all about undressing $cientology and not about Bush bashing and perpetuating old feuds with people who are on the same side?

What a wonderful point. Taking the high road.

That YOU have written.

It's a really really terrific concept.

Let's see its implementation. :lol:

Ball of Fluff · **Posted:** Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:19 pm

Ooops, same here. Saw Andreas' post afterward as I was scrolling down from yesterday. Ok. No mo'.

juju · **Posted:** Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:39 pm

Patty thanks for keeping everyone updated

tom_ · **Posted:** Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:22 am

I think a good summary here is...

THE TRUTH is better than the low road, better than the high road, and better than all roads that lead to Hubbards so-called tech in individual lives, families, and the media.

Accusations, allegations, and opinions are what they are. THE TRUTH is not synonmous with any one of these.

Example, in the matters of Paramount vs. Tom Cruise, everyone is hungry for THE FULL TRUTH to come out. But given $cienos long history of suppressing truth in any public forum, this may be difficult to ever achieve.

Tom
---------------------------------
www.xenutv.com "Scientology is inadmissable in these proceedings."
~ Judge Charles W. Boteler, Jr.

The Buttersquash Conspiracy

Who is online