Scientology's 2007 New Years Eve Event

itsaline · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:08 am

Allright. I'll delete it before google indexes it AGAIN.

I've made my point.

Hubbard's Mushroom · **Joined:** Thu Mar 25, 2004 4:02 pm **Posts:** 8290

Wow Itsaline, do you think the type on your last post
was big enough?

Marlene Dietrich · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:26 am

Admin, please delete this post by itsaline and ban her/him: This is incredibly sick.

whatntha · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:28 am

J. Swift, I still think of you as Kent Questions Everything, but you can be anybody you want to be, I’m just enjoying your evening at the 2007 New Years Event post. It helps me to laugh at $cientology because of my Ronbot friend who occasionally comes through as himself, but then reverts back.

DM stands on a box behind the podium – hilarious!

itsaline · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:29 am

Marlene Dietrich wrote:

Admin, please delete this post by itsaline and ban her/him: This is incredibly sick.

What is sick about it? Didn't you didn't know Quaoar had already provided OSA with Swifts details?

I think you need to get with the program.

Roan · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:32 am

Quote:

Hmmm...Now why weren't you calling for Quaoar's ban when he splashed JAs details ALL over OCMB???

Emma, the internet is all one, we all read the same boards. I know you know this. If someone is outed over on ARS, they are as good as outed here. That's what happened. It's a very simple, unarguable fact and concept. The fact that you cannot or will not comphrehend that, leads many to suspicion as to your motives, level of residual brainwashing, etc., etc.

Amazing and telling that you "credit" Quorar rather than the hydra-headed sockpuppet extrordanaire Prevail/HeartOfOak/Kusinagi's Ghost/Jun-Riu with outing Swift. Who is Prevai/KG registered as at your new daisy chain?

Is it Tachikoma?

Quote:

Is it If I recall correctly I was the only one upset about it. None of you lot cared one bit. Now because tigger has asked the question you get all up in arms about it. Tigger wasn't the one to put his details here. It was one of the "boyz", so knock of the transparent horror.

It's a perfectly valid question seeing all the *speculation* about how this would ruin old Swifty's life.

You whined ceaselessly about "poor Swift", yet didn't bat an eyelid when Quaoar posted his details. We see that OSA had access to his name & address thanks to Quaoar, and what with Swift being such a HUGE critic, they wouldn't overlook that minor detail AND INVITE HIM TO A BIG EVENT!!!

There is a myriad of possibilities as to how and why J. Swift would still be receiving IAS invitiations. Nuanced thinkers easily speculate to themselves, run over the possibilities and dismiss the whole issue as not worth spending much time on. Plodding, slow, stupid Scientology addled brains have trouble imagining the many real possibilities of how this could occur.

WHAT GOOD PEOPLE OBJECT TO IS TIGGER OR ANYONE THROWING REAL NAMES AROUND MESSAGE BOARDS!

Quote:

None of it adds up, but you are so overjoyed to see your "brain by proxy" return, you can't see the holes in this story.

And if Swift verifies he is NOT JA, then I think some apologies need to be handed around. Don't you?

No, I don't.

You know, Emma... fool that I was, I was just starting to get an inkling of respect for you as the start up person for a new message board. And then here you are over on OCMB, wallowing in the mire of probably the most scurrilous thing that has happened on this message board. Ooops.. #-o

I almost forgot! You were one of the architects of it all! So this makes perfect sense.
We all remember:

You had the oppurtunity to rise above all this Emma and just be the leader of perhaps a good new thing. And you fucked it up. Character always shines through, I guess.

You need to banned and quarantined to the Pan-Pacific Butch Network!

:!:

Tigger · **Joined:** Sun Nov 19, 2000 7:06 pm **Posts:** 9147

Well gee, Marlene, I gave you all the clues you needed to find it....

My name etc. have been out since 2001.

I have no doubt you will find it in here somewhere....

Operation Clambake Message Board :
[url=http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/search.php?search_id=1073232124&start=330]
Search: Tigger, Shirley[/url]

Tigger, Shirley - Google Groups:
alt.religion.scientology alt. religion. scientology

Tigger, Shirley -
Goodle Search

PTS · **Joined:** Tue Jan 10, 2006 10:40 am **Posts:** 1416

Swift must have touched a big scieno nerve with his comeback posts.

itsaline,
Show the respect here that you expect on your own board.

"The way to procure insults is to submit to them: a man meets with no more respect than he exacts."
William Hazlitt

Oh striped one,
"Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function."
Unknown

"Complaining is good for you as long you're not complaining to the person you're complaining about."
Lynn Johnston

Marlene Dietrich · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:36 am

Tigger, you are a spineless coward and everybody sees it now!

Marlene Dietrich · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:40 am

itsaline wrote:

Marlene Dietrich wrote:

Admin, please delete this post by itsaline and ban her/him: This is incredibly sick.

What is sick about it? Didn't you didn't know Quaoar had already provided OSA with Swifts details?

I think you need to get with the program.

No, I did not know that the OSA (Gestapo of $cientology, I presume) had detailed info about J. Swift. Can really someone be as retarded as you pretend to be or is it audacity?!
As far as the rest of your "program" is concerned: F_ _ _ (F O U R letter word) it.

itsaline · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:43 am

Roan wrote:

Quote:

Hmmm...Now why weren't you calling for Quaoar's ban when he splashed JAs details ALL over OCMB???

Emma, the internet is all one, we all read the same boards. I know you know this. If someone is outed over on ARS, they are as good as outed here. That's what happened. It's a very simple, unarguable fact and concept. The fact that you cannot or will not comphrehend that, leads many to suspicion as to your motives, level of residual brainwashing, etc., etc.

Amazing and telling that you "credit" Quorar rather than the hydra-headed sockpuppet extrordanaire Prevail/HeartOfOak/Kusinagi's Ghost/Jun-Riu with outing Swift. Who is Prevai/KG registered as at your new daisy chain?

Is it Tachikoma?

Isn't this just a tad hypercritical?

Marlene Dietrich · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:47 am

Itsaline :

Quote:

Isn't this just a tad hypercritical?

You're the expert!

Roan · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:52 am

itsaline wrote:

Roan wrote:

Quote:

Hmmm...Now why weren't you calling for Quaoar's ban when he splashed JAs details ALL over OCMB???

Emma, the internet is all one, we all read the same boards. I know you know this. If someone is outed over on ARS, they are as good as outed here. That's what happened. It's a very simple, unarguable fact and concept. The fact that you cannot or will not comphrehend that, leads many to suspicion as to your motives, level of residual brainwashing, etc., etc.

Amazing and telling that you "credit" Quorar rather than the hydra-headed sockpuppet extrordanaire Prevail/HeartOfOak/Kusinagi's Ghost/Jun-Riu with outing Swift. Who is Prevai/KG registered as at your new daisy chain?

Is it Tachikoma?

Isn't this just a tad hypercritical?

There you go again with your "nuanced" Scieno-think, Emma. Did it ever occur to you that I have never posted Prevail's name.
(And I'm pretty sure I know it.)

My picture is on this website... BFD.

You just can't seem to comprehend the real issues can you, Emma?

Morsicle · **Joined:** Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:29 am **Posts:** 2084

PTS wrote:

Swift must have touched a big scieno nerve with his comeback posts.

Bingo - that’s the whole ball of wax right there.

But I think this time Swift is not going to get all tangled up in it. I hope he just continues on with his next installment in his “New Years” series or moves on to something else and lets the Tigger and pals charade define itself for what it is.

itsaline · **Posted:** Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:59 am

Roan wrote:

[You just can't seem to comprehend the real issues can you, Emma?

You are posting a pic of someone who did not give you permission to post it. It was obtained by nefarious methods. Why is that an OK thing to do?

My addled brain just doesn't compute.

Scientology's 2007 New Years Eve Event

Who is online