Important Video, this is Stacy Young and Vaughn Young demonstrating hypnosis in Scientology basic courses.

http://www.5min.com/Video/How-Scientolo ... n-19932258

I'll watch it Arnie, but only if you promise that I won't get hypnotized .

BTW, The british interviewer on the vid is a guy called Paul McKenna. He used to have a very popular TV show here in the UK basically doing stage hypnotism. He did do some less crass programs that were very interesting (the video clip being an example from). Thesedays, he concentrates on his "how to improve your life in 7 days" cashcow type stuff.

Thanks for posting the clip.

you wont get hypnotized from watching stacy and vaughn do Some scientology "TRs"

but you might get hypnotized and feel like doing some new thingsm by this audio of me reading a passage from one of Milton Erickson's sessions...LINK where he uses a story of a child learning to walk to empower.

Hypnosis is practically 'everywhere', trance states are a part of life.

What is important beyond any possible stress and emphasis, is WHO is the operator..in clinical or stage hypnosis it is the hypnotist, in scientology it is Hubbard doing it through his clones "duplicating source"... or Hubbard himself in a tape or book or PL.

In stage hypnosis the old writers explain that the 'prestige' and 'altitude' and 'professional bearing' of the hypnotist is essential for RAPID inductions... because of the increased expectation... - and the most simple definition of hypnosis, is what occurs when anything or anyone focuses your attention upon one thing for a length of time.

After 20 minutes of deep meditation, I even checked the E-meter a couple times and found a nice wide F/N..

Taking control of your own trance state, by practice, is called "meditation". Once you become intimately familiar with invoking and ending your own trance states, YOU get back in your driver's seat and throw out whomever was there, be it Hubbard, or the abusive individual or ..the man on TV to quote an old Rolling Stone's song, Satisfaction:

When I'm watchin' my TV
And that man comes on to tell me
How white my shirts can be
But he can't be a man 'cause he doesn't smoke
The same cigarrettes as me

Stumbled upon a segment with a lucid explanation from Margaret SInger describing hypnosis..

Link from an email from a supporter of Lermanet.com

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fSMJtFwYS4

Roy Masters: Hypnotizing People
He says we are all hypnotized and evil people take advantage of this.

Scientology WORKS!!!

------------------------------

I used to believe that...

Pick up the Cans Please, This is the session

Is an example of a keyword phrase..most scientologist's react accordingly..when it is delivered in the same style as the hypnotic operator...

Hubbard fooled me for ten years and then some... it took another decade before I was willing to even talk to a psychiatrist .. and I was fortunate to meet and discuss Hubbard's scam with Dr Margaret Singer and Dr. Jolly West.

Hubbard liked to tell us to ALWAYS GO TO SOURCE.. meaning what the worlds most famous con man, wrote or said... well, I did him one better, I dug up every book I could find on mind control psychology,hypnotism, and electroanalgesia published between 1935 and 1956, and I browsed through them, and when I found something that smelled scientological, and my usage is like the word scatalogical... I'd read the entire text and then study the bibliography and references and then read those.

Hubbard even liked to taunt us... to see if were 'right there with him in the trance" by telling us things to see if we would notice. In one lecture on PDC, Hubturd says, "and if you think this has anything to do with hypnosis, read George Estabrooks"

Have any of you done that? If not, You will, keep reading..

Hubbard admits he knows who this fellow Estabrooks is, and it would be a safe assumption that he read him and knew you would not, because he intended to make you so busy studying his rubbish that you would never get the chance anyway, because if you did....you would find out that Dianetics and Scientology are based upon suggestion and covert military style, hypnosis.

Hubbard was a master stage hypnotist..His literary agent, forrest ackerman and others recounted his stellar performances... LINK to Forrest Ackerman's typewritten notes (Scroll down for images)

In one a kid goes around showing everyone in the room this cute miniature kangaroo, hopping about in his hand...when everyone laughs at him for doing so. LINK

Another stood screaming in pain, while holding a wooden handrail. Hubbard had told them that they were holding onto a red hot iron rail and could not let go.

If you combine both of these you get the condition of scientologist...

George Estabrooks, wrote a book about covert use of hypnosis as a fiction, in order to escape the secrecy act, because he was a psychologist who was an expert hypnotist and was called to work for The Office of Strategic Services - OSS. In his book, aptly called "Death in the Mind" he describes a fictitious tale, but states that all the scenarios are based on referenced, tested, techniques, and he even gave the citations.

I will share one paragraph from this book today...(c) 1945 It is creepy reading,



as creepy as Hubbard's test of whether we were swallowing everything he gushed when he said in OTIII "to Only run yourself and your BT's through Incident II up until you see the picture of the pilot saying "I'm mocking it up""

Was that "pilot' a jaunty looking Hubbard in his captain's uniform telling you exactly what he was doing??

Hubbard said: "I'm mocking it up"

And if any of you recall the fine print in the OTIII bulletins that said that if you did NOT see any BTs you would be required to redo your entire bridge again.. at YOUR expense.

That sounds like an implied but very compelling direct command, doesn't it?

On the subject of direct commands, consider, in Dianetics, the command value of the word "clear". Did any of you wonder why he repeated it over and over and over again?? I did, but it took me 40 years before I knew why he did... Because iit would make your previous life disappear, your friends, disappear, your family - disappear, and your bank (account) that sneaky bastard, no wonder the reges seem so irresistable.. youhad to CLEAR your BANK! A=A, eh?

More including a book HYPNOSIS, by Estabrooks, HERE

TR0 exposed as The Eye To Eye Technique for deep trance induction in a 1956 book called Hypnosis for Salesmen LINK which also contains a chapter called "Never give the customer a Choice" Does the Dissem policy by that same title sound familiar? Think Hubbard might have read this?

AND

TR1 where you read nonsensical lines from Alice in Wonderland...is in fact The Confusion Technique for covert trance induction being used on your twin.... The "Alice in Wonderland" technique using The book by the same name, is described in the Army Kubark Interrogation manual from the 50's

"Get your TRs in"

turns out to actually mean, enter L Ron Hubbard's controlled trance...where you duplicate source...do, perceive and believe exactly what Ron said, and justify it forever until you snap out of it.

And when you are sitting in the waiting room for your next session, what were you reading, while you "got your TR's IN" ??? The Gradation Chart!!! LINK You were feeding yourself suggestions, on what you would achieve in the session!

I have many more examples for those with the courage to read them..

And do not feel badly, these were military techniques, used for espionage, and counter-espionage, and it was known that the best subjects for hypnosis were highly intelligent people. because highly intelligent people, can control their minds better!

And you thought you had Body Thetans...

(c) Arnaldo Lerma
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON
WE COME BACK
for our friends and family
to help get them
out of scientology
before they end up here:
whyaretheydead.net

"Auditing is a simple, thoroughly designed means, of concentrating the mind to the state of a controlled trance. The aim and result is progressively to enforce loyalty to and identification with Scientology to the detriment of one's natural awareness of divergent ways of thinking and outside cultural influences. Love and allegiance are more and more given exclusively to Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard."
Dr. John Gordon Clark, Doctor of Medicine of Harvard Medical School

"The most effective weapons of the Oppressor Are the minds of the Oppressed"
Steve Biko

HYPNOSIS WORKS!

------------------------

Credit goeth to LRH Lied on ocmb / Feisty nick on ARS, for your inspiration, for repeatedly directing my attention to Estabrooks "Death in the Mind" even when I no longer felt like digesting this stuff any longer..

Thank you for being such a valuable resource, Arnie. I'm sure your work is deeply appreciated by those at every stage in their awakening.

Plus, it's dang fascinating!

Yeah it is fascinating, but I wish it paid better.

and thank you but it is not all my work, it takes a lot of work to even locate some of these texts, and there are faster readers than I who scan through tens of books per month, and then find things and then tell me, hey LOOK at this..some turn out to be false positives, so i do not waste readers time with the inconsequential, we waste OUR time for YOU, to find the gems..


Them: Arnie look at this

Me: I don;t feel like it, my back hurts..

Them: Please look at this, this is important.

Me: Oh to hell with 'em, scientologuists are the most selfish folks Ive ever met,

Them: Please look at this..

Me: If I wanted to punish scientologists, I'd let them stay in scientology

Them: Arnie, you need to read this...

Me: Dang, (if I look at it maybe they will stop bugging me) okay


a short while later:

Me: Holy mackeral! this is HOT! ( and to me "HOT" is proportional to how many other previously known 'dots' the new material aligns into a spear to pierce the heart of the beast.

and

if it connects into a new, now recognizable pattern of conduct by scientoliogy...

Then I try to present the data in way that recovering scientologists might, possibly, understand it, I write the hypnosis stuff for scientologists, no need to preach to the choir, and use linguistic tricks to try to get it through their thick hypnotized skulls, trying to balance satisfactory presentation with the fact that at this time, sooner is better than later, because anything we do, is being amplified by the efforts of tens of thousands of anonymous.

And time is natures most powerful amplifier of effort..

for example

Consider if you will, the 80 microamps from an E-meter...after 30 minutes the dose of electricity is equal to a theraputic dose used clinically at USC to induce a pain free state called "electroanalgesia", and it just so happens that Volney Mathison, the father of the E-meter was involved in some of this stuff..

analgesia = pain free

Underneath the toughest scientologist true believer, once you get them to wake up and deal with their denial, (and hubbard's programming) you often find exceptionally intelligent beings.. because not just Estabrooks, but Harry Aarons et al. noted that it is intelligence that determines hypnotizability,

because intelligent people can control their minds better!

Hey Arnie look at this.

Here's Hubbard on the confusion technique.



... did I hear you say "Holy mackeral! this is HOT!"

Thanks again for what you do Arnie.

In this thread
the man doing the E-meter autopsy explains in the 2nd video that the E-meter only reacts to uncontrollable muscle twitches. And nothing else. That is what makes the needle move.
At the moment that the person on the cans gets a floating needle, it means that the person has no longer muscle twitches because he is in a state of being hypnotized.

So the E-meter can in fact be used to check if the person on the cans is hypnotized or not!

Peter

dear peter,
Yes indeed, and this may be the purpose of those "meter checks" done on staff members when things are not going well..

and thank you caroline..!!

This is not strictly saying, hypnosis, this effect is covered by Bechterev, in techniques used for the psychological manipulation of crowds by autosuggestion.

... did I hear you say "Holy mackeral! this is HOT!"

Thanks again for what you do Arnie.[/quote]


From the Kubark Military Interrogation Manual:



Scientology, it's WORSE than you THINK

So, when focusing on the purely present-at-hand "evidence" (i.e. the hands rising) the conscious mind overrules the subconscious and/or instinctual awareness of the inconsistency?

More kubark...alice in wonderland, placebo technique and the 'magic room' technique..I added some notes in brackets

The placebo technique is also used to induce regression The interrogatee is given a placebo (a harmless sugar pill). Later he is told that he has imbibed a drug, a truth serum, (OR THE E_METER!!!~) which will make him want to talk and which will also prevent his lying. The subject's desire to find an excuse for the compliance that represents his sole avenue of escape from his distressing predicament may make him want to believe that he has been drugged and that no one could blame him for telling his story now. Gottschelk observes, "Individuals under increased stress are more likely to respond to placebos."(7)

Orne has discussed an extensions of the placebo concept in explaining what he terms the "magic room" technique. (Is this the secret of the Super Power Building??) "An example... would be... the prisoner who is given a hypnotic suggestion that his hand is growing warm. However, in this instance, the prisoner's hand actually does become warm, a problem easily resolved by the use of a concealed diathermy machine. Or it might be suggested... that... a cigarette will taste bitter. Here again, he could be given a cigarette prepared to have a slight but noticeably bitter taste." In discussing states of heightened suggestibility (which are not, however, states of trance) Orne says, "Both hypnosis and some of the drugs inducing hypnoidal states are popularly viewed as situations where the individual is no longer master of his own fate and therefore not responsible for his actions. It seems possible then that the hypnotic situation, as distinguished from hypnosis itself, might be used to relieve the individual of a feeling of responsibility for his own actions and thus lead him to reveal information."(7)

In other words, a psychologically immature source, or one who has been regressed, could adopt an implication or suggestion that he has been drugged, hypnotized, or otherwise rendered incapable of resistance, even if he recognizes at some level that the suggestion is untrue, because of his strong desire to escape the stress of the situation by capitulating. These techniques provide the source with the rationalization that he needs.

I regret that I am not prepared to explain it well yet... and I have something else I must do that is urgent, but here is a 2nd stab in the dark effort, I call it the Key Liem Pie technique (tm) Lermanet.com

If what I wrote in my last comment re what hubturd was up to makes sense to you, Id really appreciate if readers would try to explain it to me... if you 'grok' what im getting at there...

it is a technique used in the books mostly and tapes

example pulled out of thin air...


This sentence has five words.

This sentence has more than five words.

Men yearn for freedom.

I have found a path to total freedom.

Act now, the agonized future of every man woman and child depends on what you do here and now, today.

Send $10 to lermanet.com Exposing the CON

This provides a similar (counting heads) effect that a room with 5 people all saying the same thing, it creates an implication of peer pressure, but forms it in your own mind by getting you to agree to obvious truths repetitively.. !st sentence - you agree, 2nd one you agree, 3 rd you agree (plus deep appeal to emotion) then the KEY LIE(M) and another appeal to Emotion...

Many political speeches use this, many advertisements use this, - all who wish to manipulate you......

Hubbard uses it in his books.