The time now is Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:20 am
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
|
| Author |
Message |
Murray Luther
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:31 am Post subject:
Tommy Davis refuses to utter "Jehova"
Subject description: he's become a Monty Python routine
|
|
|
I just watched Davis' interview on Nightline and it really cracked me up. It reminded me of the scene from Monty Python's "Life of Brian" where the townspeople are trying to stone a heretic for saying the unmentionable "Jehovah." It would take too long to describe it--so google it or search it on YouTube--or whatever.
"He said Xenu! Stone him!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Judith Anderson
Joined: 16 Mar 2006 Posts: 793
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:16 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
To me, Tommy Davis' response and abrupt exit seems to be a phobic reaction more than anything.
Many religions believe in and openly discuss things that their detractors view as irrational - such as miracles, virgin birth, the Resurrection, etc. When asked to do so they are not hesitant to air these beliefs in public and they don't start bleating about infringement of religious rights. Tommy Davis probably clammed up and walked out because he had been conditioned to believe that if he talked about Xenu he could be struck down, not by lightning, but by the pneumonia bug. The average viewer doesn't know this, which makes Davis' exit even more puzzling and insulting.
One of the worst things Hubbard ever did for Scientology was to fabricate Xenu. I believe that eventually it will be one of the things that will lead to its dissolution. His adherents are hard put to fit it in so they lie about it. The public must never know about Xenu. To the parishioners, OT111 becomes more than a leap of faith. Many religions have a sequence of such leaps, but they come in a natural flow of events. Xenu takes the believer by stealth, like a mugger in an alley. Xenu demands that the believer distrusts his own senses and runs headlong through a wall of fire, disregarding everything that is patently absurd, everything that belies science and the sequence of natural events. Believing what is not believable, defying one's own senses is the ultimate test of loyalty to the cult.
Inventing Xenu was probably a source of amusement for Hubbard as he knew it was a crock and he got off on watching people struggle when they got to the wall. He was a sadistic man who enjoyed toying with his victims, i.e. parishioners and watching them pant and squirm. That's why I believe that what is wrong with Scientology started with him, not DM. After he died, DM took it and ran with it, proving to be the greater psychopath. Tommy Davis ended up being the fall guy saddled with dodging questions about the weakest link in Scientology's "scriptures" - the story of Xenu.
But all that being said, if you are a spokesperson at a nationally televised interview you don't walk out if you don't like the interviewer's questions. You just don't do that. Like Xenu, Davis is another weak link. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wieber

Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 4675
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:49 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
It's scientology policy to treat journalists with disrespect and be rude to them. L. Ron Hubbard hated the press almost as much as he hated psychiatrists and policemen.
60 Minutes did an episode on scientology in which Heber Jentzsch was totally rude to Mike Wallace.
As usual almost all the scientologists watching those shows think that their scientology spokespeople have done a great job in shattering those awful journalists. I'll wager that the talk going on among people in scientology who watched Tommy Davis is that he was just the best.
Meantime what scientology and especially the office of special affairs don't get, and they don't get it in spades, is that the audience watching the show have come to identify the journalist hosting the show as their friend and even a part of their family. To see some butt hole like Tommy Davis abusing their friend, who many of them look on as family, is insulting to them.
(Tommy, if you don't like being called a butt hole stop acting like one.) _________________ Reading List: http://www.worldcat.org./profiles/Wieber/lists/563909 scientology is a cult. -1 +1 "Then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi. scientology, check your six. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don Carlo
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4138
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikuna
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 186
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:15 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | I wish the interviewer had started by saying, "Can I ask you a yes or no question? (Tommy Davis nods) Can you say the word Xenu, yes or no?" |
LOL that would have been absolutely priceless  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
particlewave
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 3:49 am Post subject:
|
|
|
they should be confronted as often as possible on this superstition. its obvious to most sane individuals that something is wrong when a spokeperson reacts like this over the name 'xenu'
tommy boy did surprise me when he mentioned the volcano's and i thought that was a perfect opportunity for the interviewer to talk about such.
it was another priceless moment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
I'mglib

Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 2610
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:52 am Post subject:
|
|
|
This topic reminds me of something.
A while back, maybe 2-3 years, Tom Cruise was interviewed by someone, where TC almost walked out on the guy. I remember that it was a really benign question. It might have been about Nicole Kidman or something, and he got really snotty with the interviewer. So the interviewer backs down, I think he might have even apologized, and TC allowed the interviewer to continue.
Anyone else remember this? _________________ Scientology and Human Trafficking? You decide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1A4l-GItmxY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
radieux
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:24 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Just a point of curiosity... what level OT is Tommy? Is he even OT III himself?
I bring this up because it's unnecessary to "confront" non-OT Scientologists with the Xenu thing, given that their superiors will simply "handle" them.... and I doubt they'd simply offload someone over it, not as desperate as they are for new members. In other words, they'd just end up squeezing their members for sec checks and handling actions--you'd only be harming the people you're trying to reach, no?
No, Xenu is much more a rallying point for critics and the media to reach the uninitiated. Though to be honest, other than being a comparatively nascent movement based in space opera, how is the Xenu story any less credible than any other religion's allegories?
I remember the South Park episode that referenced the OT III materials with the caption "THIS IS WHAT SCIENTOLOGISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE." How would going through the events of the Old Testament or Revelations or the runic sagas or the native American mythos or Hinduism, or any other mythological system dead or alive?
The only difference, I'd imagine, is that they wouldn't go apeshit at the mention of it on national TV--well, maybe the Vikings would. But that's what Vikings do. Dude should have played it cool and either outright said it was a lie (because nobody under OT III in the church would know anyway) or simply said "It's an allegorical tale, just like the Great Flood or the story of Eris' Golden Apple."
That would at least gain back SOME of their lost reputation and make them look like a legitimate movement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
4truth2

Joined: 20 Mar 2006 Posts: 447 Location: Decatur, GA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:40 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
This thread brings up some interesting points, a couple of which I’d like to address.
For one, how many people at the top of the Scientology food chain besides Miscavige know that Scientology is complete and utter bull shit? Rinder and Rathbun are still clinging to the “tech” and are primarily focused on Miscavige’s many psychotic abuses, not Hubbard’s nor the incalculable damage Scientology has inflicted on so many people and their friends and families. Perhaps Earl Cooley was, but since he recently passed away, who knows? Yet it does beg the question of how many ex-executives knew it was all a lie and a delusion but were just interested in remaining in due to their own greed and misanthropy.
Plus, it puts Tommy Davis in a no-win situation since if he acknowledges the Xenu myth it makes Scientologists look like deluded fools (to say nothing of possibly being RPF’d by Miscavige), yet if he denies it, given the wealth of information about the OT levels on the internet, he comes across as a liar and further undermines Scientology’s increasingly shaky credibility.
Given Miscavige’s cruelty, I wonder if he likes seeing Davis squirm before the camera, since he has such contempt for the entire human race. _________________ "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SeeYaBye

Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 260
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:02 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Though to be honest, other than being a comparatively nascent movement based in space opera, how is the Xenu story any less credible than any other religion's allegories? |
Most religions, such as those based on the bible, are religions of faith. You learn from the parables in the religious writings to live a more righteous life. And you gain peace and fortitude from your faith in the almighty. It is a matter of faith and belief.
Then $cientology comes along and says you do not need to have faith. You can have full and complete "knowingness" of the true reality of life and "livingness". You are told that $cientology is scientifically researched and proven, and that faith has nothing to do with it. That was the hook that got me in -- that it was a scientific methodology that delivered the precise results laid out on the $cientology grade chart -- their Bridge to Total Freedom -- and at that time (70's) the top was OT VIII with "Total cause over matter, energy, space, and time" and at that level one achieved "Serenity of Beingness". The promise was irresistible. I wouldn't doubt that is a hook they still use. $cientology is not supposed to be based on allegories -- the claim is that it is based on research with a scientific methodology that achieves step by step predicable results. They cannot now claim some non-scientific faith-based upper level. That is a complete contradiction to all of their claims. Therefore they are taking the only route available, which is to deny and refuse to acknowledge the existance of Xenu and body thetans. For the "church" to do otherwise makes this supposed scientific method very open to ridicule. But the cat is so out of the bag that it is really a no-win situation for them at this point. _________________ See Ya, Bye! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
particlewave
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 66
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:28 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| radieux wrote: | | Though to be honest, other than being a comparatively nascent movement based in space opera, how is the Xenu story any less credible than any other religion's allegories? |
Yes, this is true. It is also true that things we find that sound ridiculous could actually be true, since our understanding of what is changes according to the information we have. Just because something sounds ridiculous, is not in and of itself proof that the thing in question is false.
The difference I feel here is that Scientology refuses to be confronted on such, whereas certain other Religious faiths openly debate and argue their merits wihtout hiding.
It also brings to Light the deceptive 'sales pitch' of Scientology, because Xenu is a long way off from what your first told.
The real question here is shouldn't you be told how much money your going to spend before you find out about something that could be found freely on the internet? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
radieux
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 168
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:10 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | The difference I feel here is that Scientology refuses to be confronted on such, whereas certain other Religious faiths openly debate and argue their merits wihtout hiding.
|
You mustn't have grown up in the South like me.
However, that's precisely the point. If they want to be treated as a religion, then they must act as such and expose themselves to reasonable criticism and allow everyone interested free access to at the very least, the lower levels of their "tech," with some forewarning of precisely what follows and how much it'll cost. Otherwise, they're doomed to be a historical footnote even 50 years from now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wogette

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Posts: 25 Location: Tampa, Florida
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| I can't remember when I've ever enjoyed a Scientology Interview this much! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rikuna
Joined: 18 Mar 2006 Posts: 186
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Quote: | This topic reminds me of something.
A while back, maybe 2-3 years, Tom Cruise was interviewed by someone, where TC almost walked out on the guy. I remember that it was a really benign question. It might have been about Nicole Kidman or something, and he got really snotty with the interviewer. So the interviewer backs down, I think he might have even apologized, and TC allowed the interviewer to continue.
Anyone else remember this? |
I think i do remember something along those lines, but for the life of me I can't remember who it was that was interveiwing him... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
I_feel_great!

Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 107 Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|