Note: Former CoS member Lisa Hamilton is circulating an open letter to David Miscavige. This letter illustrates the nature of what is happening as former members speak out against the injustices of The Church of Scientology and its leader David Miscavige. Please add your comments on Lisa's letter.

*****
Mike Rinder on Lisa Hamilton:


ref: http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2010/0 ... /#comments

LRH Policy on an Ethics Interrogatory:

Lisa Hamilton's letter of 6 July 2010 to Mr. David Miscavige, COB RTC:

Lisa Hamilton:



Lisa Hamilton:

Blogging "open letters" serve little purpose other than catharsis.
But, yes, it gives an insight into former member's thinking.

I don't think she has the tiniest bit of understanding of what a sociopath is.

Someone needs to write a book, namely a compilation of horror stories. This open letter is a start, but Lisa also needs to start collecting from elsewhere.

This Lisa Hamilton posted regularly on ask.com answering questions about Scientology on behalf of the church. I certainly wouldn't criticize her, and I feel sorry for those who feel the need to criticize and did not appreciate their gains from auditing. Now if you will excuse me, I need another toke from my crack pipe.

* edit * actually that was Laurie Hamilton on ask.com. I will have to see if she is still there.

What a load. Lisa Hamilton has no authority to send out this crap, or to threaten "Justice" action and penalties for non-compliance. Or if she has "authority" it's from someone who means wogs no good. Don't answer it people. This is intel gathering for Rathbun's underground Ethics Department. Whether the intel goes ultimately to Rathbun or DM himself, this is why people should be protesting *.Scientology.

Ms. Hamilton has Rinder's stamp of approval, and he worked for years to destroy wogs' lives. So did she, because that's what Scientology ethics terminals do.

Marty, Mike, and all their posse have signaled that they still embrace Scientology's war on wogs. Marty's references to famous wogs are to cloak his contempt for us. It is impossible to be a Scientologist of long duration and not be contemptuous of wogs because that's a key valuable final product of doing Scientology and keeping it working. If Scientologists saw wogs as their equals, this would mean that Scientology didn't work, and all Scientologists insist that it works.

In their contempt for wogs like us, Marty and Mike, et al. execute Miscavige's command intention for them. They might not be carrying out Miscavige's command intention when they target him as the who for Scientology's evil; although even that is in question. They were, after all, doing and ordering just that as "Loyalists" at least since 1984.

There is, however, no question that they serve DM's command intention by much of what they're now doing and saying, or not doing and not saying. So does Ms. Hamilton, and until she rejects Scientology and its unjust, antisocial "justice" actions and system, do not support her.

She thinks she's applying that "chain lightning" she believes in (Hubbard's "Ethics Tech") and thinks that it should work on David Miscavige, too. After all, Hubbard said so:

While Lisa's Ethics Interrogatory of DM may not mean anything out here, it has meaning to Scientologists. Therefore, if it causes more people to leave The Church of Scientology then it serves a useful function.

*****

BTW, this website xtranormal.com allows you to make cartoons very easily. If you can type, you can make a cartoon. Here is my latest on YT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbZplGdPUgY


/////

That was a great feature, Swift. Except one thing: Scientologists normally speak with a more robotic voice than yours do.

Edit - I watched your other cartoons, all great! Question, what was the subject of your "Perfect Butts" cartoon? Is there a Sci spa ripping people off or does it refer to something else?

Good point, Sea Horse. Also see HCOPL Ethics Review for the ethics gradients. Her next step according to the policy she's applying is "13. Assigning a lowered condition by limited publication." Pretty mild for a violent felon.

Sending out this interog on Miscavige is Hamilton's assertion of her ethics authority over him, and of her ethics authority over everyone to whom she's sending this interog.



She stated her objective in her 6 July 2010 letter to DM:



Hamilton knows her action and objective are preposterous. No one outside the Sea Org has ethics authority over Sea Org members. Why didn't Hamilton send out an interog on DM when she was Senior HCO PAC? What's even more preposterous is that she is claiming ethics authority over other people "who possibly have information – whether in or out of Scientology, in or out of the Sea Org or on or off Staff."

Hamilton is assuming ethics authority over the planet! Who is going to help her dole out the penalties for non-compliance? Rathbun and Rinder? Steve Hall?

The truth is that Hamilton has never had any such authority, and her misassumption of such authority is to the detriment of everyone, herself included. Imo, she is deluded, dazzled by her own hubris, and, if she isn't on a covert op, was probably manipulated into this "ethics action" by the usual disorganized suspects.

Rathbun and Rinder are on board with this madness, whether actual or manufactured.

This is not about DM of course. This is about collecting more people who have natter on DM. Rathbun and Rinder want the intel, and they want (and need) more people to help them with their actual or DM-approved Loyalist "coup."

Scientology does not and cannot ever effectively deal with its own power-hungry sociopaths because the SP doctrine effectively hides and protects them. It hid Hubbard, it has hidden DM, and it hides Rathbun and Rinder.

Now that I think about it, if Hamilton would send out interogs on Rathbun and Rinder, and threatened Scientologists and wogs with becoming Interested Parties in a Justice action if they have information on R and R but do not themselves report any knowledge of it, that might be an ethics gradient that could have an actual effect.

Caroline, I do not think it is preposterous to ask for evidence of DM's crimes, particularly if Indies have connections to law enforcement. Any actual data collected on DM has no value unless it is given the authorities or published online to expose his actions.


With all due respect, why would DM want this kind of coup where he is exposed as a physically abusive dictator and CoS itself exposed as an insane, fascist organization? For example, Marty just came out and said that OT IX and OT X do not exist. He denounced the levels as a fraud and a contrivance of Pat Broeker. What Marty said is staggering because it ends the Bridge at OT VIII forever. From a purely CoS perspective alone, that is a huge loss of future income if this is all part of a coup as you argue. I rather see it as an admission that OT VIII is the best CoS can deliver -- and this is on top of numerous OT VII's and VIII's blowing. Why would a manufactured coup end the Bridge at VIII and write off future income from OT XIII -- XV? Marty's revelation fits the theory: OT IX and OT X have never been released because they do not exist in any form that can be sold.


Freedom Magazine just spent 95 pages trashing Anderson Cooper, Mike, Marty, and many other Indies. Tommy Davis just trashed the Headley's and Marty in his letter to the SP Times. Freedom Rag and OSA have attacked Amy Scobee, Tom De Vocht, Marc and Claire, Jeff Hawkins, Nancy Many, and many other Indies and non-Indy former SO. Many of the Indies have had the contents of their folders used against them. The Headley's valiantly tried to prove that human trafficking exists inside of Sea Org. As I see it, the Indies and other former SO are locked in the fight of their lives against an oppressive regime that is quite willing to destroy all of them. Whether it is able to is another matter.

The SP Doctrine is not protecting or hiding any of the Indies or any other former SO. In fact, yet another book is slated to come out exposing David Miscavige, OSA, and indicting CoS in general. This is Jeff Hawkins' book.

I don't see any of this as a part of a coup. I see all of what is happening as a genuine schism in which a the Cult of DM is being exposed as such.

Caroline, do you think that DM and OSA have anything less than pure blind hatred for Marty and Mike and the rest of the Indies and former SO and OT's who are all speaking out?


/////

I see no problem if Lisa Hamilton wants to send out questionnaires to Scientologists (COSers and Indies) asking for information about Miscavige. I’m sure there is more to know.

The problem is that she infuses her communications with threats. She is ordering the recipients of her various missives to comply with her demands or face "full penalties." Is she nuts? What is she talking about? She tries to create an aura of having power and “ethics authority” over everyone inside and outside of Scientology that receives her messages. It’s a turn-off. I think many people leave Scientology to get away from exactly that kind of thing. It’s what Miscavige does.

Lisa, you’re in the wog world now. For all of its serious problems, it’s still a better place than the Scientology world, and always has been. It’s time to learn to ask for things nicely. Learn how to say “please."

Nobody has ethics authority over Sea Ogres except the Sea Ogres themselves (unless they do something that could get them prosecuted or sued in criminal courts).

They've just given that authority to Co$ and Hubbard's insane, paranoid system to control members' lives. Hopefully they will realize that is preposterous.

It sounds like Hamilton is another of the exes, like Marty, who still thinks Miscavige is the root of all evil, spoiling the legacy of the benevolent and wise Hubbard. Until the effects of the Kool-Aid wear off, they will continue to make bizarre pronouncements based on their equally bizarre belief system.

Law enforcement doesn't need Lisa Hamilton to threaten would-be witnesses into coming forward. DM's victims have been talking about his violent and antisocial behavior for many years. There's no evidence to suggest that law enforcement is outsourcing their criminal investigation of Scientology to these Scientologists. Besides, don't Rathbun and Rinder already have enough evidence on DM to go to law enforcement? Where are their interogs?

I'm sure that among the many disorganized Scientologists there are some with connections to law enforcement. I have seen no evidence, however, that any are reporting Scientology's crimes to their law enforcement connections. New leader Rathbun has stated rather emphatically that he would *not* go to the FBI, which would be the proper law enforcement agency to go to.

J. Swift, it's pretty odd to suggest that Hamilton's interog has some relation to a legitimate investigation by legitimate authorities. Where's law enforcement's authorization? At least the original Loyalists had fake authorizations, like this one:


No, Hamilton didn't state that she's going to go to law enforcement with the intelligence she gathers. She's applying her Hubbard ethics tech.

Arnie Lerma posted an undated report from "Scientology Insider" about Hamilton's application of ethics tech:



Lawrence Woodcraft wrote a declaration dated 24 January 2001 about Hamilton and her ethics application:



Here's an anonymous report forwarded to Tory by someone who mentioned Hamilton's rollback tech ca. 2002.

Hamilton knows, of course, that she and the other Loyalists could easily be found guilty of High Crimes if the tables were turned and they were made Interested Parties in Scientology "justice" actions. Some examples:



Hamilton must also be familiar with Hubbard's writing regarding the non-workability of Scientology outside of official control:



So, is she now saying with Rathbun that "The church is dead man" and that they (the Loyalists) are the official control? Pfft?! Just like that?



Now that's weird. She can't maintain her personal integrity unless she states what she knows. Yet she hasn't stated almost anything she knows from her years inside the cult, and isn't ready to state what she knows. But she's demanding the rest of us report to her on what we know? Preposterous. You do the interog, Lisa, and let's see what you've got.



Hamilton knew that her actions would seem ineffective. Nevertheless, she referred DM to what Hubbard wrote in HCOPL 27 March 1965 Justice of Scientology Its Use and Purpose Being a Scientologist (posted above by Sea Horse.)

Hamilton undoubtedly knows how to apply Hubbard's Ethics Review gradients. With the information already out there, she doesn't need an interog for the purpose she states.



Scientology has long been exposed as a totalitarian organization and a threat to democratic society. Rathbun and his Derailroad Co. are giving away very little new of value, as much as they'd like their followers to believe otherwise.

There's no evidence to suggest a coup would succeed. But of course a failed "coup" has benefits that DM would want, not the least of which is intel that the Loyalists are gathering on his and Scientology's victims.



Marty saying OT IX and X don't exist is a welcome admission to many who still have hopes of becoming Übermenschen, but Rathbun's "revelation" is actually a no-brainer. When did he find out? In any case, nothing Rathbun's come out with has been staggering, like Jason Beghe's "Show me a $E^%$&^%$^*Clear" is welcome, but not staggering.



All this trashing has been standard operating procedure for DM, Rathbun and Rinder for decades. Check out these Freedom articles they put out on Gerry Armstrong:
Freedom 61
Freedom 62
Freedom Special edition April/May 1985
Freedom Vol 17 No. 10

Gerry weathered six Scientology lawsuits, all of which were instigated under Rathbun, Rinder and Miscavige, the same Rathbun, Rinder and Miscavige who ran the original Loyalist Op on him. This covert op and the first lawsuit were also during the Hubbard regime. These Loyalists are still applying the SP doctrine, and are still insisting on their rightness and on Hubbard's rightness about who the bad guys are. It's pretty much all preposterous if you ask me.



If the Indies and other Scientologists were able to realize that the oppressive regime they're fighting against was spawned from the very malignant narcissist they insist on supporting and defending, i.e., L. Ron Hubbard, they would be able to deal with their oppression effectively, and would have a real chance at recovery. Right now, they're embarrassing themselves and prolonging their own hell.

I'll take this opportunity to reference Gerry's letters to Rathbun and Rinder, and the real issues that Rathbun, Rinder and the Loyalists should confront. Lisa Hamilton is obviously a smart person in a position to address their ethics on this situation:

14 April 2010
31 May 2009 Open letter to Mark C. Rathbun
7 July 2009 Letter to Rathbun for help getting back stolen manuscript
12 July 2009 Sitting Bull blowing smoke
14 August 2009 Letter to Mark Rathbun re: Black PR to the IRS
18 August 2009 To Mark Rathbun: Help on Black PR
4 September 2009 Letter to Rathbun: Apology not needed or wanted
6 September 2009Letter to Rathbun: Seeking Understanding from Wogs
14 April 2010 To Mike Rinder