But how is this any different from, say, Catholics saying that Catholicism is good despite the horrendous convictions of priest-pedophiles, the Inquisition, the Crusades, Indulgences, and everything else flawed in Catholicism? How is CoS any different from any religion or church that has had a flawed charismatic leader? Christian Science does not depend upon Mary Baker Eddy having been perfect. The Jehovahs Witnesses do not depend upon Judge Rutherford having been perfect. Even Ted Haggard's church survived his meltdown into drugs and gay sex with a prostitute. In Christianity and its variants, human perfection is assigned solely to Jesus and all other persons are all deemed to be imperfect in various ways.

IMO, all religions overlook certain flaws in key personalities because they are significantly outweighed by the spiritual benefits of religious practice. Scientology is no different in this regard.

It is entirely possible, and even desirable, to decouple the Tech from LRH. The same thing has occurred in Mormonism where the personal behavior Joseph Smith and Brigham Young have been decoupled in important ways from modern practice. For example, the polygamy practiced by early Mormon leaders does not falsify key Mormon rituals that are performed daily in the Temple. I see Scientology following the same trajectory. Predictively, CoS will abandon draconian LRH and DM policies in the same way that LDS dropped polygamy and its ban on Black men serving as priests. This is already happening in CoS to a certain extent. Pregnant couples in SO are being routed out and paid off. Freeloader Debts have been canceled. There are more signs of internal changes. However, it all seems too little too late in terms of PR. Like Mubarak, DM will have to go into exile. CoS will have a post-Miscavige era where it will have to reformat itself as have many other religions.

/////