Radio Paul wrote:
I thought WWP was protected from that type of BS. While I really don't know anything about how WWP works, I would think that due to the sensitive nature of the topics covered that the Admins are well hidden and protected ID's. Have they ever gotten a C&D from the cult?
I've read Sue's & other posts on the "Smurf Banned" thread as has an attorney friend of mine. W're laughing & shaking our heads. Note when Sue is first asked why I was banned.. she replies, "Harassing kids." When she is challenged, she responds with another allegation, and in further posts, further clarifies her position with even more false claims that supports her position. Then, her friends pipe in with "I just need to add..." in support of Sue.
In defense law, it's called circling the wagons, building a case, and if you gather enough straws, you can build a broom. It's typical behavior when a corporation is doxed by a whistleblower.. keep your friends close & use them to defend yourself against the perceived enemy (the whistleblower). Sue's more interested in being right & saving face; keeping WWP free from censorship & a focus on Scientology abuses? Not so much.
I will continue to speak out on Scientology abuses, protest at raids, and be a royal pain in the ass to those who try to stop me. I don't need Sue, her ego & her friends, to legitimize what I'm doing.
That said.. despite the fact that Scientologists believe that children are adults in children's bodies... it is never OK for a parent to neglect and/or abuse a child by surrendering that child to an organization where the child's needs & welfare are ignored, and the production goals of the cult are dominant.Note:
Contrary to what Sue alleges, I did not post the screen print of the mother's FB posting. It was posted anonymously. Mods have the ability to see who's posting anonymously, so she easily could confirm I didn't post the screen print. I responded to it as did others. My crime, according to Sue, is that I investigated further and provided additional dox.
When I inquired on the thread, the date of the post, an anon (again, anonymously) said it came from a "closed SCN-group." I later found the mother's post on her FB page.