Gumby, critics with CoS relatives will get disconnected if their name is exposed. This can be disastrous - lost jobs, diisconnected children, and CoS people losing an outside ally that they REALLY need. Expose yourself if you wish, let others judge their own situation.

Hertzlichen Wilkommen, Krautfag. Ich habe 5 Jahre in Deutschland gewohnt, und ich spreche (schlechtes) Deutsch. Ich esse Schmaltz, Spiessbraten, und graues Brot gern. Auch mag ich Altbier.

I consulted with an attorney long ago, and all the bawwing that Sue & others are claiming is face-saving bullshit trying to justify bad behavior. The photos I copied were from a PUBLIC page. It's no different than anons mirroring a video made by someone else.

Had it been on a private setting, and I hacked into the page & copied the photo, then yes, it would be illegal. I have never hacked an account.

Gray bread? What is that?

I understand what you are saying, but the admin was a known entity. If he is in fact an ex-scientologist and still has family in then that is another ball of wax entirely. I guess my question would be, if I was an ex and an admin of an anonymous board would that not set the stage for possible disconnection?

It's possible an ex-Scientologist is pretending to most people that he is a quiet mouse, but he is secretly an active critic and mod. It's possible a bunch of CoS members or Freezoners trust him in a fair weather way and their reactions are valuable in an explosion like the Debbie Cook e-mail. If that mod is repeatedly outed, OSA and even Freezoners will learn about it and make trouble, and CoS and Freeoners can point to this board or that board as a source of the name, and claim that they themselves are innocent of outing. Eventually this outing brings confusion to the mod's employers and grandmother. "So, are you one of those Anonymous that did bad thing X Y or Z?" I just want the chain of outing to not happen here.

Smurf said:

consider ourselves flattered

Flattery not intended. Facts speak louder than words. The SF anons have confirmed this. Looking forward to May. Have my motel booked.

errr, I thought that the enemy was the CofS, not each other.

Knock it the f**k off!

I concur!

Now OCMB is having an in flux from WWPers who hate this joint, heap shit on most of us and now want to come and play in our sandbox.

I ask Mods here be vigilant and cast your memories back to what happened the last time WWP and OCMB was embroiled in similar conflict. Account access was handed around leik a communal joint/spliff for everyone to have some fun with with.

What's next, moar gore and pr0n SPAMMING?

Although I more often than nopt cannot agree with Smurf and his actions, what he did was MORALLY right in the first instance.

Children are to be protected!

That's right. No crowding, and the right crowd. If you know what I mean.

Talking about the photos -- I had thought that you copied the ones that were in public domain, as you confirmed. But Sue has no knowledge of the laws, so she jumped to a wrong conclusion.

The WWP board is split regarding the Smurf issue -- some support him (I fall into this category) the others sided with Sue. The OSMB board was recently split regarding the Karen issue. These things happen to anti-Scientology groups, it would be naive to expect unanimosity of opinion.

Would it surprise anyone to know that OSA actually has people on these boards whose job it is to pull the people off focus?

Now I don't think it would be helpful to speculate who those people are but this can be combatted by knocking this sh*t off! On Marty's board it was revealed that the CofS have been covering up the death of Annie Broeker since June and we are all to busy aruing about bullshit to even notice it, JESUS!

On WWP? Most certainly!