One opened, more to come!
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 11:09 pm

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
What I do know.. is that we don't have to agree on everything, and we don't even have to like each other, to be constructive & accomplish something positive. Being a "unified front" against Scientology, doesn't mean we have to act like marionette dolls manipulated by someone pulling the strings.

The info I received from 'sixtwelve' has proven to be an invaluable asset. He may not approve how I go about my business, and he may want to fry me at the stake, but it doesn't mean that we can't be a "unified front". Too many people presume "unified" means "controlled", that is, someone has to be in charge to lead the pack. That's a load of crap.

I have received invaluable dox sent to me, through an intermediary, from a former exec in the cult, who wants no direct contact with me, but believes strongly in what I'm doing. I've received alot of intel from friends who self-identify as "Independent Scientologists". Because I am friends with Indies, it provides the militant critics the incentive to spew more venom and accuse me, without a slimmer of evidence, that I am OSA.

It doesn't bother me. Their hatred & venom will consume them more than what they choose to spew on those they hate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 1976
Location: New York City, NY, USA
sixtwelve wrote:
Demented LRH wrote:
You might be worried about psychological abuse as well, but then you would need a confirmation from a psychologist that it is actually taking place. Neither you nor Smurf is a psychologist, so yours opinions in this case do not matter

How do you know? You don't know what I do for a living. You don't know who else was there when we saw the kid, or what they do for a living, or what happened when we saw the kid (even Smurf doesn't know that part). The only way you possibly could is if you're secretly a Clearwater-area Scientologist. Are you? No? Then don't assume you know everything.

Quote:
You may have seen the kid, but have you observed him being abused? If so, your duty is to report the abuse. Then the investigation will start. Do you know that failure to report the child abuse may put you in jail in many states?

Did you know that I don't always inform OCMB of my every action?

Sixtwelve,
I live in new York City, believe it or not; I have no connection to Clearwater Anons.
You said that you are worried that I am talking about physical and sexual abuse only, so I made a reference to psychological abuse because I do not know any other form of abuse.
I do not know your occupation, but I know that Smurf is not a psychologist, so no one should expect from him psychological evaluation of the boy.

I do not know what you talked about with the boy, but I can envision only two scenario of you conversation with him:

1. The boy did not tell you that he suffered any kind of abuse in CoS.
In this case you may report either to the police or child protection services that you suspect that the boy is being abused by CoS staff. Most likely, they will let you file the report. But they will take no action even if they want to because the judge won’t sign a search warrant based on your information.

2. The boy told you that he was abused by CoS staff and gave you specifics of the abuse.
In the state of NY you have the obligation to report your findings to the police; majority of the states have the same rule. Failure to report the abuse will put you in legal jeopardy. My advice to you to report the abuse to the police if this is what the boy told you.

_________________
“This OT shit is driving me insane. On a positive side, I laugh a lot these days because I’m at a funny farm.”
L. Ron Hubbard

No soy marinero, soy capitan del culto de mi padre.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
People often confuse "child abuse" with "parental neglect." The authorities & the medical community defines the two differently, but accepts that parental neglect is a symptom of child abuse. Last July, a mother was arrested in Pasadena after she left her child, strapped in a seat, inside her SUV, windows rolled up on a very hot day. A passerby saw the child in the vehicle, smashed the window, rescued the child, and called police. Child was fine, and parent said she'd only been away from her SUV for a minute. to run into a pharmacy to pick up a prescription.

It didn't matter to police. She was arrested on child endangerment charges. She didn't physically or psychologically abuse her child, but left him in an environment which could have proved fatal. Children have died from this neglect.

http://www.nbc-2.com/story/15318919/1-y ... s-arrested

I presume that Kenya doesn't regret turning her 12-year old son over to the Sea Org; many Scientology parents have done this over the years. They don't hear of.. or they refuse to listen to.. the documented reports of abuse of children that have occurred in the Sea Org. Turning their children over to the SO is an honorable endeavor & the child has no informed consent or choice in the matter.

Karen de la Carriere (Heber's ex-wife) speaks of her son joining the Sea Org at age 11..

http://community.freezone-tech.info/kar ... ch-and-me/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 8:02 pm
Posts: 1976
Location: New York City, NY, USA
Sixtwelve,

There is no need to be offensive, I am not trying to show everyone that I am right and you are wrong. I am also trying to help the boy by giving you an advice on what to do.
Forget about what I said about your legal responsibility, I will be giving different kind of advice. But before that I would like to say what, in my opinion, went wrong between you and Smurf.

You expected too much from Smurf from legal standpoint. We all know that Smurf has connections because he is a well-known anti-Scientologists and gay rights activist. People usually get a help form him. But this case is different, I am sure that Smurf’s lawyer friends told him that not much he could do to help the boy. Smurf did the best he could by posting this data at WWP.

Frankly, as a first step I would have done the same, the only exception being that I would have bypassed WWP and chosen a website with much larger audience. Then I would have made the second step that I do not want to discuss at this thread for obvious reason -- OSA never sleeps. If you are interested in what I have to say, you could PM me.

I am no good staring PM exchange at this website -- I remember sending 2 PMs to Don Carlo with only one getting through. I sent PM to Karen, but I do not know if she got it.

You have to start a conversation with me, then I will respond to it.

I do not need to know the details of your conversation with the boy to give you advice.

_________________
“This OT shit is driving me insane. On a positive side, I laugh a lot these days because I’m at a funny farm.”
L. Ron Hubbard

No soy marinero, soy capitan del culto de mi padre.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 1:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
An anon posted on WWP, that my posting the information rendered "the investigation moot," and claimed investigators would now not report back to her. This anon is ignorant of investigatory procedures as it relates to law enforcement and child advocacy agencies.

It is no different than reporting it to the FBI - they never release the details of their investigation, nor will they tell you whether they are investigation is active or they have buried it. The FBI will open tell you it is "pending". Case in point: The FBI investigation of D.B. Cooper, who hijacked 40 years ago (1971) remains open and is "pending".

Law enforcement investigators won't even release details of their investigations to family members. Sometimes, attorneys can get some details if they get a court order from a federal judge.

The only time I'm going to hear back from investigating agencies is when they require additional information, or an arrest has been made, and they need me as a witness. Otherwise, I'm left clueless as the person who didn't report the abuse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 43
Smurf wrote:
What I do know.. is that we don't have to agree on everything, and we don't even have to like each other, to be constructive & accomplish something positive. Being a "unified front" against Scientology, doesn't mean we have to act like marionette dolls manipulated by someone pulling the strings.

We tried to do that. And then you intentionally blew an op.

After doxing an anon, by the way. Don't think we forgot that.

@Gumby: I suppose I shouldn't be surprised to see you trying to tell Clearwater anons how to behave. You always did like to do that:

http://forum.reachingforthetippingpoint ... l#msg17758

SocialTransparency/Gumby wrote:
The activist side of me says "You go girls" but the sheer volume of online banter and tone of that banter by these two needs to be taken into consideration. Please do not go "Oh Matt is hatin on the anons again". That is not my intention. This is directed @ the individual, not the stance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:34 am 
sixtwelve wrote:
Gumby: Given your rocky relationship with certain anon cells in the past, I'm fairly sure I should be glad you decided to stay away.
Anon cells? Please! Grow the heck up (name deleted). You make it sound like anon is a career move or something which it is not. One ding a ling does not make a cell. I feel sorry for you. Your life revolves around a mask and a blog site.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 43
Technically speaking, WWP is a forum, not a blog. :)

What, did I touch a nerve with that link?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:46 am 
SocialTransparency/Gumby wrote:
The activist side of me says "You go girls" but the sheer volume of online banter and tone of that banter by these two needs to be taken into consideration. Please do not go "Oh Matt is hatin on the anons again". That is not my intention. This is directed @ the individual, not the stance.
None whatsoever. I,ve had a long day directing a national television commerical so I may be not up to par to spar online @ the moment. You do reinforce my happyiness when I and many others distanced ourselves from a local fail anon years ago. :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 5046
Location: Bondi Beach
Gumbythetruth wrote:
One ding a ling does not make a cell.


I LOL!

_________________
"If anyone talks about a "road to Freedom" he is talking about a linear line. This, then, must have boundaries. If there are boundaries there is no freedom." - Dianetics 55


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 3:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 5046
Location: Bondi Beach
sixtwelve wrote:
.

After doxing an anon, by the way. Don't think we forgot that.



This is OCMB and not WWP, don't you forget that.

Funny how all of a sudden( after the lets dog-pile Smurf WWP drama) you have coincidentally arrived here.

Some of you peeps need to get it into your heads that there is no individual bigger than the task at hand.

Go read some of Robert Vaughn Young's words, they may open your eyes

_________________
"If anyone talks about a "road to Freedom" he is talking about a linear line. This, then, must have boundaries. If there are boundaries there is no freedom." - Dianetics 55


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
sixtwelve wrote:
We tried to do that. And then you intentionally blew an op. After doxing an anon, by the way. Don't think we forgot that.
It's clearly obvious you are beyond being rationality & you're clearly biased (in a negative way), as confirmed in the nasty, over-the-top pm you sent me.

Before a mod removed it, my "doxing an anon" was related to an admin that had already been doxed by the cult years ago, had been served with a C & D letter (like many of us), and was referred to by his real name by Scilons at protests. One can't, realistically, dox an anon that was doxed by the cult, but Anonymous has it's rules (and games).

You know that, but you'd rather stew in your anger and venom & lash out.


Last edited by Smurf on Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 43
'Alert' wrote:
This is OCMB and not WWP, don't you forget that.

No risk of that happening.

Quote:
Funny how all of a sudden( after the lets dog-pile Smurf WWP drama) you have coincidentally arrived here.

Oh, it's not a coincidence. I made an OCMB account after Smurf got himself banned so that I could let him know where the kid was. Would you prefer I had not done so? Because I sure as hell prefer I had not done so.

Quote:
Some of you peeps need to get it into your heads that there is no individual bigger than the task at hand.

Psst, Smurf, I think he means you.

@Smurf: lol, that isn't the anon I meant. Can you not keep them straight anymore?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:10 am
Posts: 2681
sixtwelve wrote:
Psst, Smurf, I think he means you. @Smurf: lol, that isn't the anon I meant. Can you not keep them straight anymore?
You're a sad, sad man. I know a great therapist in the Clearwater area. PM me if you'd like a referral.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WhyWeProtest distraction Jan 2012
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:47 am
Posts: 43
I'm a man? Well, shit.

Also, I'd take you up on your offer but some of us don't need cult exit specialists.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 154 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group