AgentX9:

1.The reason they(most probably)killed Bono was because he threatened to go to the F.B.I.

2.They(possibly)murdered J.F.K jnr because he was
seen as a major long-term threat to Scientology.

People who've crossed Scientology have died for lesser reasons than these.

I'm afraid I'm not too sure how they(whoever it was)did it, I'm sure we are not meant to know either.

The head of the Los Angeles F.B.I believed Scientology controlled the largest private army/security force/intelligence agency in the world. It's in the Time article.

What more proof do you need of Scientology's activities in this area ?

Bono threatened to go to the FBI with what? Who says? If that's the motive for killing him, it's still thin. Means and opportunity still missing, too. You mean to tell me they made him ski into a tree? How?

So what if JFK, Jr. was a long-term threat to the Co$. So's Bob Minton, so's Tory Bezazian, so's Andreas, so's every critic who posts here. What made him so special and why would they be so scared of him that they would want to kill him?

What the head of the LA FBI says is no proof that the Co$ killed those two men.

Try again.

X9

To AgentX9: The cult is not only NOT "capable of hiring slick, professional assassins to kill high-profile political figures?". They simply wouldn't spend that much money on it. They'd get some rookie "osa" kid, do "the most good for most # of dynamics" on him, convince him to go on a suicide mission and when he was arrested, deny ever having heard of him; then tell him to do a "end cycle".

BTW, the cult made Bono ski into a tree, using their super-duper "OT Power". They just put the thought in his head, "You will now ski into a tree." Same with JFK, Jr. "You will now become disoriented and fly into the ocean." I have it on the excellent authority of Mr. Nutbard that this can be done.

Isn't there a remote controlled stun gun in existence? I vaguely remember hearing about these being used against horses, I think racehorses. Sorry I can't be more specific, but I think it is a possibility.

A remote-controlled stun gun is alsmost a contradiction in terms, because guns shoot things, and those things become independent of the gun once shot. If they didn't, then you would have a missile launcher and missile. Gotta watch those MUs. Oh how they can set you back. Repeat drill 5,000 times until you get the like, message.

But there are remote-controlled stun belts. They are used on prisoners in courtrooms. The prisoner can go without handcuffs in front of the jury (say, while representing himself or herself) while wearing a stun belt. Misbehavior or escape attempts can be stopped when a deputy pushes a button.

Of course, anyone wearing a stun belt is fully aware of it. It's no small item of clothing.

And the CIA has not invented any sort of tiny implanted device to control your thoughts at the flick of a remote switch. I swear. I swear it. I swear it's true. Oooo, such a headache.

AgentX9 + Fifth Element:

What proof have you got that he hit a tree whilst ski-ing? Has there ever been a proper investigation into his death? If their has it was sure to be cult influenced from the top down.

Remember the press only reports on the information it is given. They are no modern day Woodward's and Bernstein's out there to expose this, the mass media seem to be too afraid to tackle Scientology.

AgentX9:

Somebody like J.F.K jnr poses a massive threat to Scientology. He is not only super rich and powerful but has a lot of political strength as well. Bob Minton,with all is money, can never be as much threat to Scientology as one of the Kennedy's.

I'm sure there is a policy on how to deal with people like J.F.K jnr. Ron made it perfectly clear what needed to be done for Scientology to reach the position of complete power.

Ronisxenu.

Aren't there stun guns that don't require the victim to wear a belt?

Do a drill 5,000 times? Just reading about the mindnumbing nature of scientology drills makes my brain less willing to function.

Yes, there are handheld stun guns, but they are not remotely controlled. You have the thing in your hand, you press the button, and zap.

In addition there are guns that shoot darts at the target. The darts are connected to wires that lead back to the gun. Pull the trigger, the darts fire, and then the electric charge hits. One brand name for this type of gun is the Taser.

Neither of these are remote-control devices. In both cases, you are connected to the person being zapped.

Ronisxenu.

I appreciate your answering so fully.