One opened, more to come!
It is currently Sat Oct 25, 2014 9:45 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: An Update on Scientology's War of Racial Superiority
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10211
Location: Los Feliz, California
In June of 1965, L. Ron Hubbard took the bizarre step of declaring Scientologists to be a new and distinct race that was separate from, and superior to Homo Sapien, the race into which he himself was born and belonged. This spurious and hateful distinction allowed Hubbard to inject the diabolocal element of racial superiority into the minds of Scientologists:

Quote:
"HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis, new. (BCR, p. 12) 2. a theta-animated mest body possessed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skyscraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40) 3. the Second Stage Release is definitely Homo novis. The person ceases to respond like Homo sapiens and has fantastic capability to learn and act. (HCOB 28 Jun 65)"
-- L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary

[Re: "Homo Scientologicus"] : "Man had to cease to be Homo Sapiens and had to become Homo Scientologicus in order to accomplish any action that was anywhere near efficient in South Africa."
-- L. Ron Hubbard, PAB 119 1 September 1957 The Big Auditing Problem

[7] Any non-Scientologist is a "wog," someone who "isn't even trying."
(Ref: L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary.)

ref for above cites:http://www.suppressiveperson.org/

Having declared non-Scientologists to be racially inferior to Scientologists allowed Hubbard to dehumanize them in the minds of his followers. Having dehumanized non-Scientologists as a racially inferior, it was an easy next step for Hubbard to declare that Scientologists could harm any members of this inferior race should they dare attack Scientology and the superior race of Homo Scientologicus. Hubbard stated in writing that the members of the inferior race were to be treated like game animals during hunting season, for Hubbard declared them to be Fair Game:
Quote:
ENEMY -- SP Order. Fair game. May be deprived of property or injured by
any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientol-
ogist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.

LRH:jp
Copyright c 1967
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

The governments of England, America, Greece, and other countries saw the dangers of Scientology in the 1960's and conducted investigations. The media covered these investigations and this all brought negative attention to Scientology. That members of an inferior race would dare attack the master race of Homo Scientologicus and its Supreme Leader infuriated L. Ron Hubbard. Accordingly, on 16 Feb 1969, L. Ron Hubbard, realizing that he could not defeat the world in one decisive battle and bring it under a Scientology dictatorship, declared a war of attrition against the world.

Let us consider Hubbard's "BATTLE PLAN" against the world thirty-six years after he issued this declaration of war. First, the BATTLE PLAN itself. I will present it in sections with commentary. The bolded sections are my emphases:
Quote:
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 16 FEBRUARY 1969
ISSUE II
REISSUED 24 SEPTEMBER 1987

(Reissued with updated distribution.)

Limited
Distribution:
IMEC
OSA NW
LRH PRs

Confidential

BATTLE TACTICS

(This is a defense paper on material developed after 18
years of ceaseless attack by a foreign enemy. Nothing in
this paper advocates physical violence or invites the physical
destruction of persons.)...


We see that Hubbard opened his Battle Plan by stating that, "nothing in this paper advocates physical violence or invites the physical destruction of persons." However, while not advocating violence or murder, Hubbard does not explicitly condemn or forbid physical violence or murder. It is out of character for Hubbard to be vague. In his other policy letters he was always very explicit about details as when he defined what constituted crimes against Scientology and their punishments. In another example, Hubbard wrote a detailed policy on how to prepare his barley formula for babies that he claimed was based on an ancient Roman formula.

In his Battle Plan, Hubbard left the door open to physical violence and murder for that which he does not advocate he also does not forbid. In point of fact, Hubbard's 1967 Policy of Fair Game was still in effect when he issued this Battle Plan and Fair Game allowed the enemy, i.e. the inferior race of Homo Sapiens, to be injured. Hubbard never revoked the policy of Fair Game but he did order that the policy never be publicly discussed due to the negative PR it drew. Hubbard's successor, David Miscavige has never gone on record as publicly canceling and repudiating the Policy of Fair Game or Hubbard's 1969 Battle Plan.

Hubbard continues with his Battle Plan:
Quote:
In these days of "cold war" when actual warfare is
impossible due to atomic weapons, the warfare is waged in the
press and public in the form of ideas.

If you uniformly apply the tactics and strategy of battle
to the rows we get into, press or legal or public confrontation,
you will win.

The enemy uses " groups" and meetings of groups like one
would use squads.

If we and they are considered as two hostile and opposing
nations at war, then a huge array of tactics and strategy
become visible...

In the above bolded section we see that Hubbard considers Scientology to be a sovereign nation, a law unto itself, that is at war against a nation of inferior peoples, i.e. Homo Sapien. It is clear that Hubbard understood Scientology to be in a state of war against the world.

Hubbard continues:
Quote:
One parallels in the field of thought what is used and
done in the field of battle in other ages.

You don't have to know too much about the tactics and
strategy of warfare to apply this but it helps.

The end product of war, according to Clausewitz, the
authority on it, is (condensed) "to bring about a more amenable
frame of mind on the part of the enemy."

But there are also wars of attrition. We are engaged
in one where total destruction of us has been the enemy's aim
for, at this writing, 19 years. This is barbarian warfare,
thus the enemy must have had very positive fears and terrors
about us. Since he fought for total attrition. In this case
it is not safe to hope for any half-way win. We must ourselves
fight on the basis of total attrition of the enemy. So
never get reasonable about him. Just go all the way in and
obliterate him.

It is bad warfare to fight battles on your own terrain,
in your own subject area. It is not good to fight in the
territory of allies. Fight battles wherever possible only on
enemy terrain, in and about his subject and his people, not
ours. You can gauge your relative success by this. When
all your battles are fought on his terrain, you are winning.

A good general expends the maximum of enemy troops and
the minimum of his own. He makes the war costly to the
enemy, not to himself.



In the section above, Hubbard calls for a war of attrition in which Scientology will, over time, wear down the forces of the inferior race of Homo Sapien. Hubbard also calls a minimum expenditure of Scientology's resources to do so. If we consider Scientology's conduct of war since 1967 when Hubbard announced Fair Game, we can see that Scientology has relied upon the Economy of Terrorism. In the tactics of terrorism, only one individual need be singled out for a psychologically devastating public attack in order to silence the masses. This is economical and does not require an army.

Hubbard's policy, and one followed by his successor David Miscavige, is to Fair Game individual critics by using intimidation, harassment, and financially ruinous lawsuits. In the calculus of its terrorism, Scientology wants the victim to scream loudly in agony while others look on and shudder and decide not to attack Scientology. Given that Scientology had hundreds of millions of dollars, it could afford to quietly pay off the people it had ruined. The victims would get enough money from Scientology in a legal settlement to start a new life and would, in return, agree to never speak of the settlement or of Scientology in public or private. Once the critic silently disappeared from the public scene, the perception that remained was that Scientology could destroy people with impunity.

Scientology Fair Games former members who seek to tell the truth about Scientology as well as journalists who seek to report on the abuses and excesses of Scientology. The cult does this because it wants to publicize itself as an organization that can take vengeance upon any member of the inferior race who dares to criticize it publicly.

However, all of this has changed due to the enormous cultural repudiation and ridicule of Scientology that erupted in 2005. There is strength in numbers and the global citizenry decided in 2005 to act in unity and attack Scientology for its race war, its polices of Fair Game, and its excessive litigation. Scientology cannot sue the entire world and it cannot destroy the internet where we can tell the truth about Scientology.

*****
In all cases of Fair Game, Scientology's vengeance against valid and documented criticisms was immediate, brutal, and completely out of proportion to the criticisms made. It was meant to be this way for Scientology wanted to get the message across to the inferior race -- and especially its journalists -- that even the slightest criticism would result in a massive and overwhelming retaliation that was focused on character assassination and financial ruination. Hubbard took no half measures in his scorched earth policy against the inferior race. The enormous cultural repudiation and ridicule of Scientology that erupted in 2005 is, in part, payback for the decades of intimidation.

We next see page two of Hubbard's Battle Plan against the inferior race of non-Scientologists:
Quote:
Copyright (c) 1969 by L. Ron Hubbard.
All Rights Reserved.

HCO PL 16.2.69 II
Reiss. 24.9.87 -2-

One cuts off enemy communications, funds, connections.
He deprives the enemy of political advantages, connections
and power. He takes over enemy territory. He raids and
harasses. All on a thought plane - press, public opinion,
governments, etc.

Seeing it as a battle, one can apply battle tactics to
thought actions.

Intelligence identifies targets and finds out enemy
plans and purposes, enemy connections, dispositions, etc.
It is fatal to attack a wrong enemy. But it is good tactics
to make the enemy attack wrong targets or persons himself.

Good intelligence pinpoints who when where what.

Good PRO plans an action and operations fights the battle.

Legal is a slow if often final battle arena. It eventually
comes down to legal in the end. If intelligence and PRO have
done well, then legal gets an easy win.

You can win a battle even without legal and by PRO alone.
You intend to win it without legal wherever possible.

The prize is "public opinion" where press is concerned.
The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and
are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy. This means standard
wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity,
war crimes trials, the lot. Know the mores of your public
opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love.
That's you.

You preserve the image or increase it of your own troops
and degrade the image of the enemy to beast level.

Always be ready to parley but watch for tricks. Don't
give the enemy breathing space.

Capture and use his comm lines. A press magnate on your
side is a big win.

You have in one of these publicity wars all the factors
of modern wars complete with artillery, cavalry, infantry.

For example at this writing, all fighting has been on our
terrain; they knew our generals we didn't know theirs; they
had all the press, funds, government control. We are reversing
this. We are fighting now on their ground. But we have a
long way to go.

We will make it all the way providing we look on this in
terms of active battle and not as a "if we are saintly good we
will win." The people who win wars have a saintly image but
they win the war by clever and forceful use of the rules of
tactics, strategy and battle.

Wars are composed of many battles.

Never treat a war like a skirmish. Treat all skirmishes
like wars.


In page two, we see Hubbard's utterly psychotic state of mind emerge when he says, "The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy. This means standard wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity, war crimes trials, the lot. Know the mores of your public opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love. That's you."

Hubbard wanted to act sadistically towards the inferior race and yet he wanted this inferior race to love Scientology, and who was the embodiment of Scientology except L. Ron Hubbard? Hubbard was a paranoid schizophrenic: He wanted to be Ron the Terrible who savagely destroyed his enemies, and, he also wanted to be loved and admired as Ron the Savior of Humanity.

Factually, L. Ron Hubbard was mentally ill and violent. That he had a personal fortune estimated to be as high as $400 million dollars in 1969, allowed him to surround himself with lawyers and to use surrogates to do his dirty work. As we saw in Operation Snow White, eleven of the top leaders of Scientology went to prison. Everyone that is except for the mastermind, L. Ron Hubbard. All of the other leaders of Scientology paid for having taken part in the largest act of domestic espionage in US history. However, Hubbard, while he would write the Battle Plan, lead the war, amass the great fortune, and take revenge on his enemies, would not take responsibility for his crimes in Snow White. Instead, he threw his expendable subordinates into the fire and had them pay for his crimes and sins. This included his wife Mary Sue Hubbard who took the fall for her husband. I'm sorry, but I have to get personal here: What kind of man allows his wife to go to prison for his own crimes? I'll tell you what kind of man does this: A complete coward. A real man takes his punishment and doesn't throw his wife to the Feds. As an aside, Anthony Pellicano, despite everything he did that was wrong, sucked it all up and did the right thing: He went to prison and refused to cooperate. Pellicano is a man and Hubbard wasn't.

Hubbard finished his Battle Plan on Page Three with a massively incorrect view of the Cold War:
Quote:
HCO PL 16.2.69 II
Reiss. 24.9.87
-3-

The cold war is a war. The West is losing it because it
is fighting by other rules than the rules of war. We mustn't
lose it.


L. RON HUBBARD
Founder

Adopted as official
Church policy by
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL

LRH:CSI:jk.ja

[/quote]
The Battle Plan can be found at: ref:http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50grand/cult/sp/pl-1969-02-16-battle-tactics-reiss-87.html

*****
In this 1969 document, LRH acted as a military leader laying out grand strategy for a Race War based upon attrition against the enemy. Thirty-six years later, things are going very badly for Scientology in its war of racial superiority and attrition against the rest of humanity. Here are some facts to consider:

1. In the 55 years of its existence, Scientology has not made any positive humanitarian difference in the world. Scientology has not built one hospital or medical center to help the poor. Scientology has not made any attempts to help with global hunger, poverty,or bring medicine to the poor. Scientology has instead devoted its energies and wealth to engaging in a senseless and violent campaign to destroy its critics and intimidate the public into not criticizing Scientology.

2. Scientology is not devoted to humanitarianism but only to PR. When the Tsunami and Katrina happened, Scientology rushed some of its members into the disaster areas. These members then obtained supplies donated by other groups and got themselves in front of the cameras as they distributed the emergency supplies. After the news coverage died down, the Volunteer Ministers left the scene. Scientology has made no long term financial commitment to helping in Indonesia or New Orleans. The world now knows that Scientology engages in shameless ambulance chasing in order to get free PR. To compound this obscenity, Scientology doesn't even contribute supplies as that would cost it money. It instead uses a strategy in which its members insert themselves into the distribution chain and hand out the supplies in front of cameras in order to be perceived as the people who actually donated the supplies. This is craven and calculated opportunism in its most gross and debased form. The world is digusted by such contemptible behavior. Mr. Miscavige should disband the Volunteer Ministers if they exist solely for PR purposes and use such disgraceful tactics to obtain PR for Scientology.

3. All of the world now knows that Scientology is based around a story about an evil galactic warlord named Xenu, or XeMu (the spelling is in dispute) and Body Thetans:
Quote:
OT III, also called "The Wall of Fire". Deals with Incident 2, Xenu, the evil galactic overlord, and the H bombs on Hawaii 76 million years ago. Hubbard said that anyone who was exposed to this level casually would "freewheel" through it, become a chronic insomniac, then get sick and die. "Locating and auditing of body thetans on Incident I (first incident in MEST universe) and Incident II (incident which caused the degradation of these beings into body thetans and clusters as caused by Xenu approximately seventy-five million years ago). Emphasis on this level is ridding the pre-OT of body thetans which are conscious enough to respond to the auditing. Available at Advanced Organizations and higher. Partially replaced by New OT V." - Jonathon Barbera. See Incident Two.
ref:http://xenu.net/archive/ot/


4. All of the world now knows where Hubbard stole his ideas from:
http://xenu.net/archive/lrhbare/

5. In 2005, Scientology has been engulfed by a global surge of anger directed against its decades of violence and intimidation. This surge began with Tom Cruise's bizarre behavior during interviews with Oprah and Matt Lauer. The surge increased with the South Park episode.

6. Scientology tried to stop television station KQRE in Albuquerque, New Mexico from airing a special on its top secret Trementina site. What is Scientology trying to hide 300 feet underground in a remote corner of New Mexico? Why did it scar the earth at this site with secret symbols that can be seen from space?

7. Certain people who left Scientology in 2005 have indicated that Scientology's membership and finances have plunged.

2005 has seen Scientology suffer an extreme amount of attrition in its war of racial superiority. The reputation of Tom Cruise, Scientology's celebrity spokesman, was destroyed in a vast onslaught of ridicule in 2005. If Tom Cruise is Homo Scientologicus, the living embodiment of a Scientologist with the vaunted OT powers, then there are truly no wins to be had on OT. Indeed, there are only losses to be suffered on OT.

There comes a time when a Scientologist must realize the truth about Scientology. Are Scientologists ready to make December, 2005, the month and year they leave Scientology? If you are in Scientology, make it your New Year's resolution to leave Scientology and begin life anew. Do not spend 2006 in Scientology.

Homo Scientologicus is an illusion, a mirage that you will chase forever and never find for the simple reason that it does not exist. Stop fighting for a lost cause and a bad leader.

Rediscover your humanity and rejoin the human race in 2006. We will welcome you back with open arms and rejoice that you have come home after such a long time.

/////


Last edited by J. Swift on Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:47 pm, edited 9 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 7:28 pm
Posts: 435
J SWIFT
In June of 1965, L. Ron Hubbard took the bizarre step of declaring Scientologists to be a new and distinct race that was separate from, and superior to Homo Sapien, the race into which he himself was born and belonged. This spurious and hateful distinction allowed Hubbard to inject the diabolocal element of racial superiority into the minds of Scientologists:

Quote:

"HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis, new. (BCR, p. 12) 2. a theta-animated mest body possessed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skyscraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40) 3. the Second Stage Release is definitely Homo novis. The person ceases to respond like Homo sapiens and has fantastic capability to learn and act. (HCOB 28 Jun 65)"
— L. Ron Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary

BB
You again come across like a muck raking journalist.

" Hatefull distinction" you said.

"Homo Novis" or clear is a state that has no exclusions. It is open to all
who wish to persue it. No matter ethnic group, previous belief, sex, or gender. You may think this is all nonsense and thats fine.

Its not about hate. The idea is to "Clear the planet".

All are included. Even you if you wish to be!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10211
Location: Los Feliz, California
Quote:
"Homo Novis" or clear is a state that has no exclusions. It is open to all who wish to peruse it.


A few observations BB:

1. "Homo Novis" is a spurious distinction. It was LRH's attempt at racial superiority and the dehumanization of non-Scientologists.

2. "Homo Novis... has no exclusions." On the contrary, any new Scientologist must sign an extensive and legally binding agreement in which they:

A) Surrender their Civil Rights to CoS.
B) Allow CoS to imprison them in the Introspection Rundown for an indeterminate period, this at the sole discretion of CoS.
C) Sign away their right to take the CoS to court for any and all injuries caused by Scientology, it agents, and assigns up to and including death.

3."It is open to all who wish to peruse it." This should read that, "Scientology is open to all who can afford it. Courses are paid for in advance by cash, check, or credit card."

4. BB: If you are OT how come you can't figure out how to use the quote function? Hubbard promised an increased IQ and yet you cannot get your mind around the quote function here at OC and so your replies are difficult to read and suffer from incoherence as a consequence.

5. BB said, "Its not about hate. The idea is to "Clear the planet". Why did Hubbard then state that Scientology is at war with Homo Sapiens? It was hateful of LRH to declare a race war in which Homo Novis (Scientologists) are at war against humanity. LRH quoted Lao Tzu's Art of War, the works of Clausewitz, and other martial texts on how to wage war against one's enemies. Hubbard's embrace of war and military strategy as the basis of his religion proves that Scientology is not a humanitarian religion. Waging a race war and being a humanitarian religion are mutually exclusive goals. Both cannot simultaneously be true of Scientology. I have quoted Hubbard, the "Source" of Scientology to prove that he intended a race war and in fact conducted a race war as does Mr. Miscavige, his successor as the Supreme Dictator of Scientology.

6. BB said, "All are included. Even you if you wish to be!" No thank you, BB. I have a great life and have no wish to be the slave of Scientology and David Miscavige. The last time I was in an Org in 1983, they wanted $12,000 for two intensives of Life Repair, and that was just to get me on the Bridge! I calculate that I have saved at least $300,000 by refusing to pursue Scientology in 1983 beyond a few cheap courses. I invested that $300,000 in far better investments than Scientology.

7. BB said, "You may think this is all nonsense and that's fine." BB, I don't think it is nonsense. I think Scientology is rather a very serious and dangerous mind control cult. My goal is to inform and educate the public online and to assure lurking Scientologists here that it is a very wise decision to leave Scientology as soon as possible. My intention for 2006 is to see a record number of Scientologists leave the Church of Scientology. To help realize this intention, I contribute here at OCMB with all of the others. We are a group who take Scientology very seriously and see it as a danger.

BB, what keeps you in Scientology?

/////


Last edited by J. Swift on Wed Jul 01, 2009 7:04 pm, edited 4 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 492
Location: Cuba
BB,

You have no evidence to back up your claims and on the other hand J. Swift uses nothing but the evidence to back up his opinion/statement. He took LRH's words right from LRH's doctrine. Face it, $cientology not a religion!

Joey


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 2039
Quote:
BB

You again come across like a muck raking journalist.

" Hatefull distinction" you said.

"Homo Novis" or clear is a state that has no exclusions. It is open to all
who wish to persue it. No matter ethnic group, previous belief, sex, or gender. You may think this is all nonsense and thats fine.

Its not about hate. The idea is to "Clear the planet".

All are included. Even you if you wish to be!


And BB you come across as an extremely angry Scientology adherent.
You have attacked J. Swift time and again.

Your true colors are glowing.

So you don't like what J.Swift has to say. No need to call him a "muck raking journalist".

"Clear the Planet"?! Why don't you read what Robert Vaughn Young had to say about "Clearing the Planet". It is to enslave man.

But no, this doesn't ring true for you. You know the "real" truth about LRH and Scientology.

Tsk. Tsk.

Yes you are dragged on the lines on this board constantly. You are on a message board which opposes much of Scientology including many of its tech practices. Go figure dude.

So don't even try to get away with the notion of preaching "Clear the Planet". Save it for your freezone message board.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 7:28 pm
Posts: 435
J SWIFT
A few observations BB:

7. BB said, "You may think this is all nonsense and thats fine." BB, I don't think it is nonsense. I think Scientology is rather a very serious and dangerous mind control cult. My goal is to inform and educated the public online and to assure lurking Scientologists here that it is a very wise decision to leave Scientology as soon as possible. My intention for 2006 is to see a record number of Scientologists leave the Church of Scientology. To help realize this intention, I contribute here at OCMB with all of the others. We are a group who take Scientology very seriously and see it as a danger.
BB
Well thats all fine and good. But you are intellectually dishonest. As I
said I'll call you on that.

JS
1. "Homo Novis" is a spurious distinction. It was LRH's attempt at racial superiority and the dehumanization of non-Scientologists.
BB
This has nothing to do with race. Thats total intellectual and dishonest bullshit. In fact it is black PR.

ANYONE can be homo novis. ALL are welcome.

Where does the def of homo novis indicate a racial or language
qualifier?

JS
BB, what keeps you in Scientology?

BB
Well, a little part of it was the inclusion of anybody, regardless of race, creed, previous creed, gender, class and so on. Further, on staff one is
promoted purely on results- stats.

There may be many things wrong with COS and scientology. Racial issues are not one of them. Had they been I would never have been a member.

Why don't you criticize what deserves it rather than promoting black PR and lies!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 7:28 pm
Posts: 435
LUCY
So don't even try to get away with the notion of preaching "Clear the Planet". Save it for your freezone message board.
BB
Its not a message that I've ever promoted in such words.

I was merely pointing out that such a goal is incompatible with racial descrimination.

Its a point regarding logic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 2039
A point about logic ...

There is no logic to "Clearing The Planet".

lucy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 11:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2002 7:28 pm
Posts: 435
LUCY
A point about logic ...

There is no logic to "Clearing The Planet".

BB
I wasn't addressing that point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 2039
Quote:
BB
You again come across like a muck raking journalist.

" Hatefull distinction" you said.

"Homo Novis" or clear is a state that has no exclusions. It is open to all
who wish to persue it. No matter ethnic group, previous belief, sex, or gender. You may think this is all nonsense and thats fine.

Its not about hate. The idea is to "Clear the planet".

All are included. Even you if you wish to be!


Excuse me, read your statement above. Whatever point you were making Terril you are trying to sell the idea of "Clearing the Planet". As you are always promoting the tech. It is what you believe in and defend all the time. Another discussion, another day, same ol' Terril preaching the tech.

It may not be about hate. But it surely isn't about love or connection either. It is about enslaving the minds of man for greed and power.

LRon was a racist. But like most of Scientology it was "changed" like all the tech is continually changed to keep the rats spinning on the wheel in the cage. Just my point of view. Take if or leave it. Which you will certainly leave knowing your disposition and love for Scientology.

So the idea about "Clearing the Planet" is bogus and carries no logic for me.

Good luck on clearing the planet Terril.

I hope that one day you wake up to the beauty and truth that rests inside your soul. You don't need LRonHubbard to help you with that.

In your own time.

Best to you,

lucy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:09 pm
Posts: 10211
Location: Los Feliz, California
Quote:
But you are intellectually dishonest

BB, please tell me how I am being intellectually dishonest. I cited L. Ron Hubbard by chapter and verse to substantiate what I said about Hubbard's goal of establishing Homo Scientologicus as a race superior to Homo Sapien.

Hubbard was profoundly ignorant of many things and yet well-read enough to appear to be an expert to those who did not know science. Hubbard like to assume false knowingnesses to support whatever he had to say. In the argot of the rough streets, one might say that, "Hubbard pulled stuff out of his ass." A ruffian might say such a thing about your precious Hubbard, but I will leave it at saying that he liked to, "assume false knowingnesses."

Let me quote Hubbard further from his Errors in Time lecture of July 18, 1963 where he describes why the work of Charles Darwin is all an implant. This quote will illustrate how far off the deep end Hubbard plunged when he decided he was an expert on everything. Scientologists who are easily embarassed may wish to leave the room now:
Quote:
"The Darwinian theory, which probably influenced Pavlov to the greatest degree, is just an implant. That is an implant from man to mud. And it starts out oddly enough with the goal, 'to persist' …

And then they show you your arrival, which you… See, actually they have you in a cell for a while, so they show you being in the cell, and then show you arriving in the room to be implanted. Got that? So you've actually — if you were conscious when you went in the room, it — you've got now two arrivals in the same room, see? And then they show you — complete with pictures, not unlike a modern motion-picture screen, they show you all that has happened to you, very briefly; they give you background on how mean you are, and then they show you getting implanted …

Now, this incident — this incident, now with a wheel dating device which gives you a series of numbers that gives you — gives you the time of these events, shows you being implanted, shows you finished implanting, shows you leaving — being pushed out of the implant room, even shows you a couple of your fellow crew members, or something like that, there, who are tied up ready to be put into the room, shows you being put aboard a spaceship, shows you being taken to another planet, shows you being dumped in the sea, and shows you start from the sea and become seaweed and become this — and to work up stage by stage — giving the millions of years which elapse on each step, see? And you go on and on up the line, each step, each step, each step on an evolutionary channel, and you run all the way through on these evolutionary channels.

And then they push you out through that exact corridor, past the exact two dummies that are tied up, to the exact spaceship, put you in the exact capsule, drop you into that exact sea, and expect you to make some seaweed and go on up the beach …

But, the idea — that's very finite. That's a very short time ago. That's only a couple of hundred million years ago. A lot of characters around here got this, most of them become scientists. That actually is the sole foundation of the Darwinian theory. That's the lot. Evolution: there's no such thing.

Bodies don't evolve. They deteriorate, but they don't evolve. You can trace all kinds of reasons how they evolve, and why they evolve, and you can figure it all out, but the truth of the matter is when you get horses on a planet, somebody came along and mocked up [created] some horses! Now they also mocked up these horses with the capability of growing hair or not growing hair. You've got adjustment factors, but not evolution factors. So you confuse the adjustment factors and prove the whole theory of evolution. And now you know man came from mud, and you can write a book like Pavlov and get the whole world poisoned. You see how this one goes?" [Hubbard, "Errors in Time", lecture of 18 July 1963

ref:http://www.solitarytrees.net/cowen/misc/ronbiol.htm

BB, I am glad that I do not have to defend Hubbard and his writings. I feel a deep sadness for you that you are stuck having to defend Hubbard. BB, if you care to examine LRH in detail, you will find that he is the one who is intellectually dishonest.

BB, can you be intellectually honest enough to admit Hubbard's intellectual dishonesty?

.


Last edited by J. Swift on Thu May 17, 2007 6:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 11:00 am
Posts: 4149
Location: Hop-Skip Away from Scientology TODAY!
Thank you J Swift

A fun read with a sharp retort

_________________
Do you THINK scientology works?
Then read THIS PAGE here on XENU.NET


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 9:06 am
Posts: 1537
Location: Room 666 Hotel California
To BB:

Swift's point is that:

LRH tried to establish a new race

the race of homo novis, which he considered to be superior to homo sapiens, and for which he (LRH) defined the characteristics.

This has NOTHING AT ALL TO DO with common social perceptions or delimiters of "race" such as skin color, geographical point of origin, cultural characteristics, etc. within the biologically defined race of homo sapiens. In fact, "race" as you are using it in your reply to J.Swift is an incorrectly used term as in fact, ALL homo sapiens are of the same race.

(As you would see with just a bit of word clearing on the scientific classification system for earth organisms, both animal and vegetable.)

The main characteristics of the new race [homo novis are stated in LRH's definition: "mest clear ... the Second Stage Release is definitely Homo novis. The person ceases to respond like Homo sapiens"

These are characteristics that LRH defined, and claimed are only achievable through scientology. Therefore, the new race of homo novis has quite distinct qualifications and delimiters as to who is included and who is not.

Any homo sapiens who has not undergone the "processing" required to turn him or her into homo novis is EXCLUDED from the "new race" of homo novis, and is considered by LRH to be "inferior."

So you could say that since almost any member of the race of homo sapiens can theoretically seek scientology "processing" through which they can seek to attain "mest clear ... the Second Stage Release" and thereby BECOME homo novis, the door is open to human beings of whatever physical characteristics we currently refer to (technically incorrectly) as "racial" characteristics.

But UNTIL AND UNLESS THEY BECOME HOMO NOVIS, they are still homo sapiens and thereby, inferior -- according to "Ron." According to Ron, calling oneself a "scientologist" alone is not enough to gain superior homo novis status.

Get it?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 2:23 am
Posts: 8106
Location: Cyberspace
basicbasic wrote:
LUCY
A point about logic ...

There is no logic to "Clearing The Planet".

BB
I wasn't addressing that point.


Right. "Clearing the planet" refers to de-abberating it. (and before anyone starts with me, of course I don't think CofS wants to do that or is doing that, and it's not any goal of mine, either.)

If someone posits the idea of deaberrating a planet, then keeping a large segment of it down through racism would be a conflict.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 10:22 pm
Posts: 5630
Quote:
BB said: "There may be many things wrong with COS and scientology. Racial issues are not one of them. Had they been I would never have been a member."


Apparently you have not read these rascist comments by LRH, BB?

Ladybird


Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2005

By: Ladybird
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This very excellent Web page has many, many LRH quotes that show what a racist attitude he had towards the rest of the world. I included a few quotes from this site (it is 10 pages long), just so you get an idea of how scientologists are taught to think.

And don't forget, they think ALL non-scientologists are "WOGS" and consider themselves more enlightened and superior to you, too!


http://solitarytrees.net/racism/deny.htm

"Illiterate cultures do not survive and they are not very high. The
natives of the tribe of the Bugga-Bugga-Booga-Boogas down in Lower
Bugga-Wugga Booga-Woog are mostly no longer with us, or they are around
waving red flags today and revolting against their central government.
Well, the British Tommy that went down there with his Snider, or
his Lee-Enfield, and brought them higher education in the first place
was only occasionally followed by anybody who taught them anything. And
they didn't learn fast. Their literacy was not up to absorbing culture
rapidly.
They've been very happily down amongst the bong-bong trees, you
know, dancing up and down amongst the bong-bong trees, and the highest
level of their interest and so forth was their own back yard."
-L. Ron Hubbard, The Study Tapes, "Study: Evaluation and Information",
lecture given 11 August 1964


"Now we say there's, well, another place in the world—there's India.
Wonderful place — except for its people."
-L. Ron Hubbard, "The Control of Hysteria" (lecture), 15 April 1957.


"He's [the Arab] been going crazy steadily and gradually ever since he
lost the early very fertile basins of the Middle East. He's been going
crazy ever since he failed to learn wheat farming and brought about the
erosion of all of the fertile areas of the Middle East."

"This race has been going for a very, very long time and has been eating
death for a very long time and it is death."

"The Arab is to a point where he won't even follow a decent leader. He's
got to have a man of blood, a man of cruelty, exaggeration and bigotry.
Then he'll follow him."

"...the Arab is trying to be pleased with death and murder and mayhem
and disease and poverty and political unrest."
-L. Ron Hubbard, 20th Advanced Clinical Course, "Case Analysis—Rock
Hunting", lecture of 4 August 1958


"Japanese is a baby talk — very, very hard to read, very, very, easy to
talk. ... A very faint kind of language."
-L. Ron Hubbard, New Slant on Life, Bridge Publications, 1997


"You can put these things into the hands of some Chinese and send him to
Hong Kong and we'll have cleared chinks."
-L. Ron Hubbard, tape 5211C06A LS-1, "Methods of Research - The Thetan
as an Energy Unit"; also known as "Secrets of the MEST Universe", lecture 1)


Of course, L. Ron Hubbard 's hatred of Black and Chinese people is amply
reflected in his own personal writings:


" ...[The Chinese] have neither the foresight or endurance to overrun
any white country in any way except by intermarriage. One American
marine could stand off a great many yellowmen without much effort."


"A Chinaman can not live up to a thing, he always drags it down."


"They smell of all the baths they didn't take. The trouble with China
is, there are too many chinks here."
-L. Ron Hubbard, personal journal, 1928


"You shouldn't be scrubbing the floor on your hands and knees. Get
yourself a nigger; that's what they're born for."
-L Ron Hubbard, in a letter to first wife, Polly Grubb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 86 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group