Another Scientology Photo Alterations?

stargazer · Joined: 23 Jul 2005 Posts: 78

The lady in the orange to to the left of DM looks like she's wearing two different shoes.

J. Swift · Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 9113 Location: 100 Swift Street

Wieber · Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 5587

I am into three posts on this thread making this comment.

Kirstie could be using one of these.

_________________
Reading List: http://www.worldcat.org./profiles/Wieber/lists/563909 scientology is just another cult. "I feel we could almost fly to Europe on this." Dr. Steve Wiseman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GXxPu40S_3c

moontaco · Joined: 31 May 2002 Posts: 895 Location: NYC

RealityWillTell · Joined: 10 Apr 2006 Posts: 2929

As J. Swift pointed out through his source that DM is out of proportion (he is
wider than a human being would be). I decided to look into it myself. I have
a forward view articulated skeleton which I scaled it and corrected for the
camera angle and overlaid it.

DM is out of proportion, either he is a Neanderthal or he has been stretched width wise was out of scale.

As you can see I was able to scale the Nancy skeleton overlay to show she is essentially correct. I couldn't completely angle it properly because I have only a 2D skeleton and Nancy is twisted in reference to the camera but it is enough to show proper proportionality (whereas DM is almost straight on).
_________________

J. Swift · Joined: 28 Apr 2005 Posts: 9113 Location: 100 Swift Street

RWT, fantastic work and thanks for the help. DM's jacket must be padded with layers and layers of foam to make him look large. The skeletal overlay shows that the DM we see is not anatomically correct. DM's face looks very wide in the photo compared to his normally thin face. The overlay of a proportionate skull on his widened face shows a stretching effect.
_________________

technomysticism.com
contact: scienowriter@gmail.com

mate · Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 436

In addition to the observation that Miscavige has ended up with the arms of a monkey, there is another glaring error in this composition. About six or seven rows back, the heads of the "OTs" from there back, are too small. It certainly looks like the group in front has been superimposed on the back group, that the front image has been overlaid over the back group. This would be easy to do with photoshop. The outcome is to give the impression that there were a large number present, when there were very few.
_________________
David_Graham
Ex-Sea Org
Ex-Class IX Solo NOTs C/S,
Ex-QEI & D/QEI
Ex-FSO
Ex-SO
Ex-Scientologist
Declared SP.

vongole · Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 253 Location: Teegeeak

That earlier photo is certainly a fake. An SO source of mine managed to obtain a cropped version of the original from the secret Int archives. It seems that David Miscavige was completely unaware of what was actually going on behind his back.

Here we see the true identity of the man with his arm around Nancy Cartwright's waist. That's the sort of toyboy Scientology provides celebrities with when you donate ten million bucks to the Midget Führer's coffers. Forget about getting to bang your hot RTC auditor in the celeb auditing rooms - (special bed provided) - ten million bucks gets you your own personal headless body to control.

OT Sea Org photographers have long been able to photograph the headless bodies that most of us can't see. They are often used to swell the numbers at poorly-attended Scientology events.

Kirstie Alley is about to attest to Operating Weight Level VIII after a successful paper bag rundown.

DM blew a gasket when he saw the original proof: "Where do all these people come from? I'm surrounded by SPs! They're everywhere! Everyone is ordered to the RPF! Just let me chew this priceless oriental rug in peace!"

_________________
"Dad had an insatiable desire for an awful lot of money... All the money went to Dad." L. Ron Hubbard jr.

Tommy exposed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zIihiJIDvg

Little Bear Victor · Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 539

moontaco · Joined: 31 May 2002 Posts: 895 Location: NYC

Unlisted · Joined: 30 Jan 2008 Posts: 52 Location: :noitacoL

Even with the large amounts of money that CO$ possesses, they obviously can't find a person who's remotely skilled to do their photoshops.
I'm sure Nancy has a heart-shaped cut-out of herself and

David

nicely framed next to her bed.

somebody · Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:34 pm Post subject: Re: Mystery revealed!

probity · Joined: 06 Apr 2006 Posts: 572 Location: Back to top

Don Carlo · Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4658

Sorry, double post

Don Carlo · Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 4658

If you compare Blue-shirt's arms to Kirstie's arms, you could imagine that the Blue-shirt's wrist touched the back of Nancy and were
enormous enough to wrap around. But are there are fingers on the other side of Nancy, or it is too blurry to tell?

If there are fingers on the other side, then Blue-shirt couldn't have put them there. Then, the man-sized hands on
Nancy could have been a man who was photoshopped OUT. Look at the blue shirt on the man behind Nancy -
the color is uneven in a kind of oval where a man's face would have gone. The name tag on the blue shirt is dim gray.
Compare to the wide group photo where every other name tag is bright white.
Also, David's pant leg looks super-wide - as if to blur out another man's pants.
Nancy divorced in 2005, and it simply could have been a boyfriend who she broke up with between the photo-shoot and the photo publishing.
Or the person could have been a recently disconnected brother to Nancy, who comes from a big family.
Or we're just overly suspicious.